IBMQ ranks 2nd and MUNB 22nd of 32 funds in the Defined-Maturity Municipal Category.
IBMQ vs MUNB
IBMQ −0.08pt a year
0.10%0.18%
IBMQ 137.3×the volume
129K937
IBMQ vs MUNB Performance
+2.2%+0.8%
- IBMQ 0.10%, better
- MUNB 0.18%
- IBMQ $691M
- MUNB $14M
- IBMQ +2.2%, better
- MUNB +0.8%
- IBMQ 2.48%, better
- MUNB 2.36%
- IBMQ 2957
- MUNB 254
- IBMQ 129K sh, better
- MUNB 937 sh
- IBMQ $25.44
- MUNB $99.59
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | IBMQ | MUNB |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A87Higher | C45 |
| Mission | A100Higher | F20 |
| Risk | B58Higher | C44 |
| Tradability | A93Higher | C45 |
| Holdings | A94Higher | B65 |
| Durability | A95Higher | C42 |
Rank among Defined-Maturity Municipal funds
Same Category. IBMQ and MUNB are both graded against the same 32 Defined-Maturity Municipal funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
IBMQA
MUNBC
In short
IBMQ A muni ladder rung in ETF form: thousands of investment-grade bonds that mature or get called by late 2028, then the fund winds up and pays out. AMT-free index, income paid monthly.
MUNB Not a one-and-done maturity fund: MUNB packs a ten-rung municipal ladder into one ticker, paying monthly federally tax-exempt income, returning principal each year as rungs mature, then liquidating in 2035.
Stated mandate
IBMQ The fund seeks to track an index of investment-grade U.S. municipal bonds that are expected to mature or be redeemed before December 2, 2028.
MUNB The Fund seeks periodic distributions through 2035 consisting of federally tax-exempt income and/or principal. It uses a laddered municipal-bond strategy with maturities spread across annual rungs through the terminal year.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
IBMQ vs MUNB Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
IBMQ vs MUNB Cost
Overpaying MUNB vs IBMQ
$1,643
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
IBMQ 0.10%
$2,106
MUNB 0.18%
$3,749
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | IBMQ | MUNB | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $183 | $328 | $145 |
| 20 | $717 | $1,281 | $564 |
| 30 | $2,106 | $3,749 | $1,643 |
- 0.10%IBMQ, cheaper
- 0.18%MUNB
- Middle half of Defined-Maturity Municipal funds
- Median 0.18%
IBMQ cheapest of 32 funds
MUNB 10th cheapest of 32 funds
IBMQ vs MUNB Dividends
- IBMQ 2.48%, better
- MUNB 2.36%
- IBMQ $0.63
- MUNB $2.36
- IBMQ $0.06
- MUNB $0.20
- IBMQ Oct 1, 2026
- MUNB Oct 1, 2026
- IBMQ Oct 6, 2026
- MUNB Oct 7, 2026
- IBMQ Monthly
- MUNB Monthly
Distribution history
IBMQ vs MUNB Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- IBMQ 3.3%MUNB 4.8%
- Return per unit of risk
- IBMQ −0.14MUNB −0.42
- Worst fall
- IBMQ −10.8%MUNB −4.8%
- Market sensitivity
- IBMQ 0.54MUNB 0.15
Popular comparisons
- 0.10% · 0.10%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.18% · 0.10%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.10% · 0.10%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.18% · 0.10%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.10% · 0.10%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.18% · 0.10%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.