Skip to content

IBOT vs RTOO

VanEck Robotics ETF

IBOTANasdaq

VistaShares Robotics Supercycle ETF

RTOODNYSE Arca

Overlap

27.8%by weight

Expense ratio

IBOT −0.28pt a year

IBOT0.47%RTOO0.75%

Avg volume · 30D

IBOT 2.3×the volume

IBOT14.4KRTOO6.19K

IBOT vs RTOO Performance

Jul 31, 2026 – Oct 30, 2026

−4.0%IBOT−10.3%RTOO

Jul 31, 2026 to Oct 30, 2026. IBOT −4.0%. RTOO −10.3%. Use the arrow keys to read each point.0%5%10%Jul 2026Sep 2026Oct 2026
Expense ratio
IBOT 0.47%, better
RTOO 0.75%
Fund size
IBOT $99M
RTOO $3M
1Y total return
IBOT +17.9%
RTOO No data
Yield (12M)
IBOT 0.32%
RTOO No data
Holdings
IBOT 69
RTOO 61
Avg volume (30D)
IBOT 14.4K sh, better
RTOO 6.19K sh
NAV per share
IBOT $62.00
RTOO $21.75
52W range

ETF.net Grade

IBOT: Cost 85, Risk 79, Mission not scored, Tradability 67, Holdings 74, Durability 67. RTOO: Cost 18, Risk 31, Mission not scored, Tradability 26, Holdings 67, Durability 33.
Pillar letters and Scores for IBOT, RTOO, with each pillar’s weight
PillarIBOTRTOO
Cost30% weightA85HigherF18
Mission25% weightNot scoredNot scored
Risk15% weightA79HigherD31
Tradability15% weightB67HigherD26
Holdings10% weightA74HigherB67
Durability5% weightB67HigherD33

Rank among Robotics & Automation funds

Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Same Category. IBOT and RTOO are both graded against the same 18 Robotics & Automation funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Robotics & Automation⁠

Category · 18 funds
See all 18 ›

IBOT ranks 1st and RTOO 16th of 18 funds in the Robotics & Automation Category.

  1. Rank 1AIBOTVanEck Robotics ETFScore 77
  2. Rank 2BFBOTFidelity Disruptive Automation ETFScore 67
  3. Rank 15DDRNZREX Drone ETFScore 34
  4. Rank 16DRTOOVistaShares Robotics Supercycle ETFScore 29
  5. CROBNot yet graded
  6. ROBXNot yet graded

Our read on each fund

ETF.net Research

IBOTAVanEck Robotics ETF

RTOODVistaShares Robotics Supercycle ETF

In short

IBOT A straight robotics play. IBOT tracks the BlueStar Robotics Index across about 70 companies tied to robotics, rather than a broad basket of tech "disruptors", and charges well under the typical fee in its niche.

RTOO No data

Stated mandate

IBOT The fund seeks to track the BlueStar Robotics Index as closely as possible, before fees and expenses, while following companies involved in robotics.

RTOO No data

Why people hold it

  • IBOT 0.47% a year, comfortably below the median expense ratio among robotics and automation ETFs.
  • Index-driven and focused: roughly 70 names selected for robotics involvement, so the theme stays the theme.
  • On our review, one of the stronger builds in the robotics and automation group on cost, portfolio construction and risk profile combined.

RTOO No data

Worth knowing

  • IBOT Thinly traded. Spreads can run wider and sizeable orders can nudge the price more than in mainstream funds.
  • Not the cheapest shelf option: Themes Humanoid Robotics (BOTT) charges 0.35%, though it targets a narrower humanoid slice.
  • Launched in 2023, so the track record is short, and payouts come annually or semiannually rather than as a steady income stream.

RTOO No data

Full IBOT profile⁠

Full RTOO profile⁠

IBOT vs RTOO Holdings

How IBOT and RTOO differ

Overlap by weight

27.8%

Shared holdings make up 40.7% of RTOO and 34.8% of IBOT.

Level by level

  • Holdings19 in both27.8%
  • Countryby domicile53.5%
  • Asset classEquity100%

Sector

No Sector split for RTOO.

Country, concentration and asset class

Country by domicile

Country weights in IBOT and RTOO, widest gap first
CountryMore in IBOTMore in RTOO
United StatesIBOT +27.9 points
ChinaRTOO +14.4 points
JapanRTOO +11.5 points
South KoreaRTOO +7.8 points
TaiwanRTOO +7.3 points
NetherlandsIBOT +5.8 points
SwitzerlandIBOT +5.7 points
GermanyRTOO +3.5 points
Other countries (8)IBOT +5.2 points

Outside the US: IBOT 97% developed, 3% emerging. RTOO 62% developed, 38% emerging.

Concentration

Weight in the 10 largest Holdings

  • IBOT41.7%
  • RTOO34.0%

Securities held

  • IBOT65
  • RTOO60

Asset class

IBOT
Equity
RTOO
Equity

Holdings

  • Only in IBOT46
  • In both19
  • Only in RTOO41

Only in IBOT

46 securities, 64.9% of IBOT by weight

  • Emerson Electric Co6.23%
  • Asml Holding Nv4.81%
  • Abb Ltd4.40%

Only in RTOO

41 securities, 59.2% of RTOO by weight

  • Nabtesco Corp3.56%
  • Robotis Co Ltd3.26%
  • Harmonic Drive Systems Inc3.14%

Weight gaps

All 19 Holdings in both funds, largest gap first.

Holding weights in IBOT and RTOO, widest gap first
HoldingMore in IBOTMore in RTOO
Nvidia CorpNVDAIBOT +4.49 points
Yaskawa Electric CorpRTOO +2.87 points
Novanta IncNOVTRTOO +2.01 points
Autostore Holdings LtdRTOO +1.90 points
Keyence CorpIBOT +1.55 points
Teradyne IncTERRTOO +1.25 points
Cognex CorpCGNXRTOO +1.11 points
Renishaw PlcRSW.LRTOO +1.06 points

All 70 IBOT holdings⁠All 61 RTOO holdings⁠

How we measure overlap

Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.

IBOT vs RTOO Cost

Overpaying RTOO vs IBOT

$5,064

On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.

  • IBOT 0.47%

    $9,418

  • RTOO 0.75%

    $14,482

$10,000
30 years

Cost over time

  • IBOT 0.47%
  • RTOO 0.75%
  • Overpaying
One line per fund, from year 0 to year 30. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$5K$10K$15K051015202530RTOO $14,482IBOT $9,418

Year by year

YearIBOTRTOOOverpaying
10$847$1,336$489
20$3,261$5,078$1,817
30$9,418$14,482$5,064

Expense ratio

  • 0.47%IBOT, cheaper
  • 0.75%RTOO
  • Middle half of Robotics & Automation funds
  • Median 0.54%

IBOT 4th cheapest of 18 funds

RTOO 14th cheapest of 18 funds

IBOT vs RTOO Dividends

Last 12 months to Oct 30, 2026
Yield (12M)
IBOT 0.32%
RTOO No data
Payout (12M)
IBOT $0.20
RTOO None
Last payment
IBOT $0.20
RTOO No data
Ex-dividend
IBOT Dec 22, 2025
RTOO No data
Paid on
IBOT Dec 26, 2025
RTOO No data
Frequency
IBOT Annual
RTOO No data

Distribution history

Per share, 2023 to 2026, same scale for both

IBOTAnnual · 3 paymentsAll IBOT payments⁠
One bar per payment. 3 payments from 2023 to 2026 YTD. Dec 18, 2023 $0.82; Dec 23, 2024 $1.15; Dec 22, 2025 $0.20. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$120232026YTD
RTOOAll RTOO payments⁠

No distribution history available.

IBOT vs RTOO Risk

Fall from peak · 5 years

This chart needs five years of history for both funds.

Risk facts

VolatilityStd dev, 3 years
IBOT 20.4%RTOO No data
Return per unit of riskSharpe ratio, 3 years
IBOT 1.01RTOO No data
Worst fallMax drawdown, 5 years
IBOT −25.4%since Apr 2023RTOO No data
Market sensitivityBeta, 5 years
IBOT 1.40RTOO 0.00

IBOT and RTOO in the news

Popular comparisons

  • IBOTAvsFBOTB

    VanEck Robotics ETF · Fidelity Disruptive Automation ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.47% · 0.50%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • RTOODvsFBOTB

    VistaShares Robotics Supercycle ETF · Fidelity Disruptive Automation ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.75% · 0.50%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • IBOTAvsFDIFB

    VanEck Robotics ETF · Fidelity Disruptors ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.47% · 0.50%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • RTOODvsFDIFB

    VistaShares Robotics Supercycle ETF · Fidelity Disruptors ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.75% · 0.50%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • IBOTAvsWDRNB

    VanEck Robotics ETF · WisdomTree Physical AI, Humanoids, and Drones Fund

    Expense ratio
    0.47% · 0.45%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • RTOODvsWDRNB

    VistaShares Robotics Supercycle ETF · WisdomTree Physical AI, Humanoids, and Drones Fund

    Expense ratio
    0.75% · 0.45%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.