IBTJ ranks 4th and IBTK 5th of 30 funds in the Defined-Maturity Treasury Category.
IBTJ vs IBTK
Same figure. Both funds show the same value, so neither comes out ahead.
0.07%0.07%
IBTK 1.1×the volume
398K432K
IBTJ +0.7pt
+0.1%−0.6%
IBTJ vs IBTK Performance
+0.5%−3.2%
- IBTJ 0.07%
- IBTK 0.07%
- IBTJ $1.56B
- IBTK $1.23B
- IBTJ +1.1%, better
- IBTK +0.2%
- IBTJ 3.78%
- IBTK 3.79%, better
- IBTJ 40
- IBTK 28
- IBTJ 398K sh
- IBTK 432K sh, better
- IBTJ $21.42
- IBTK $19.23
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | IBTJ | IBTK |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | B65 | B65 |
| Mission | A100 | A100 |
| Risk | C53Higher | C48 |
| Tradability | B63Higher | B60 |
| Holdings | A73Higher | B65 |
| Durability | A88Higher | A84 |
Rank among Defined-Maturity Treasury funds
Same Category. IBTJ and IBTK are both graded against the same 30 Defined-Maturity Treasury funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
IBTJA
IBTKA
In short
IBTJ One rung of a Treasury ladder in a single ticker. IBTJ holds only US Treasuries maturing in 2029, giving a defined end date instead of a bond fund that rolls its maturities forever.
IBTK A single rung of a Treasury ladder in ETF form: IBTK owns only U.S. government bonds maturing in 2030, so it behaves more like one bond with an end date than an open-ended bond fund.
Stated mandate
IBTJ The fund seeks to track an index of U.S. Treasury bonds maturing in 2029, offering defined-maturity exposure for income, stability, bond-ladder construction, and interest-rate-risk management.
IBTK The fund seeks to follow an index made up of U.S. Treasury bonds that mature in 2030.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
IBTJ vs IBTK Holdings
How IBTJ and IBTK differ
Two bond funds rarely hold the same issues.
Level by level
Sector
No Sector split for IBTK.
Country, concentration and asset class
Country
| Country | More in IBTJMore in IBTK | IBTJ | IBTK |
|---|---|---|---|
| United States | Same weight | 100.0% | 100.0% |
Concentration
- IBTJ35.7%
- IBTK53.1%
- IBTJ38
- IBTK26
Asset class
- IBTJ
- Fixed Income
- IBTK
- Fixed Income
Holdings
Two bond funds rarely hold the same issues, so this page lists no shared Holdings. IBTJ holds 38 securities, IBTK 26.
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
IBTJ vs IBTK Cost
Same expense ratio
$1,480
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
IBTJ 0.07%
$1,480
IBTK 0.07%
$1,480
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | IBTJ | IBTK |
|---|---|---|
| 10 | $128 | $128 |
| 20 | $503 | $503 |
| 30 | $1,480 | $1,480 |
- 0.07%IBTJ
- 0.07%IBTK
- Middle half of Defined-Maturity Treasury funds
- Median 0.07%
IBTJ cheapest of 30 funds
IBTK cheapest of 30 funds
IBTJ vs IBTK Dividends
- IBTJ 3.78%
- IBTK 3.79%, better
- IBTJ $0.81
- IBTK $0.73
- IBTJ $0.07
- IBTK $0.06
- IBTJ Oct 1, 2026
- IBTK Oct 1, 2026
- IBTJ Oct 6, 2026
- IBTK Oct 6, 2026
- IBTJ Monthly
- IBTK Monthly
Distribution history
IBTJ vs IBTK Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
- IBTJ
- IBTK
Risk facts
- Volatility
- IBTJ 4.0%, betterIBTK 4.9%
- Return per unit of risk
- IBTJ 0.13, betterIBTK 0.12
- Worst fall
- IBTJ −15.9%, betterIBTK −18.5%
- Market sensitivity
- IBTJ 0.72IBTK 0.88
Popular comparisons
- 0.07% · 0.07%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.07% · 0.07%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.07% · 0.07%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.07% · 0.07%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.07% · 0.07%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.07% · 0.07%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.