ICSH ranks 1st and LQID 75th of 78 funds in the Cash & Ultra-Short Income Category.
ICSH vs LQID
ICSH −0.27pt a year
0.08%0.35%
ICSH 120.7×the volume
1.64M13.6K
ICSH vs LQID Performance
+0.8%+0.5%
- ICSH 0.08%, better
- LQID 0.35%
- ICSH $8.97B
- LQID $13M
- ICSH +3.6%
- LQID
- ICSH 4.13%
- LQID
- ICSH 408
- LQID 32
- ICSH 1.64M sh, better
- LQID 13.6K sh
- ICSH $50.47
- LQID $24.81
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | ICSH | LQID |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A89Higher | F6 |
| Mission | A100 | |
| Risk | C53Higher | D32 |
| Tradability | A76Higher | F14 |
| Holdings | A95Higher | C47 |
| Durability | A90Higher | F9 |
Rank among Cash & Ultra-Short Income funds
Same Category. ICSH and LQID are both graded against the same 78 Cash & Ultra-Short Income funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
ICSHA
LQIDF
In short
ICSH BlackRock's active cash-parking sleeve, live since 2013: roughly 250 ultra-short investment-grade bonds and money market instruments, run for current income with preservation of capital, at 0.08% a year.
LQID An active take on parked cash: it reaches past plain T-bills into short-maturity credit, including dollar-denominated foreign paper, seeking extra income. Fee is 0.35% net of a waiver through May 31, 2027 (0.45% gross).
Stated mandate
ICSH The fund seeks current income consistent with preservation of capital through actively managed exposure to ultra-short-term investment-grade bonds and money market instruments.
LQID The Fund seeks current income. The issuer describes LQID as an enhanced fixed-income strategy intended for short-term liquid allocation and enhanced yield.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
ICSH vs LQID Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
ICSH vs LQID Cost
Overpaying LQID vs ICSH
$5,437
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
ICSH 0.08%
$1,689
LQID 0.35%
$7,126
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | ICSH | LQID | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $147 | $634 | $487 |
| 20 | $575 | $2,454 | $1,879 |
| 30 | $1,689 | $7,126 | $5,437 |
- 0.08%ICSH, cheaper
- 0.35%LQID
- Middle half of Cash & Ultra-Short Income funds
- Median 0.18%
ICSH 10th cheapest of 78 funds
LQID 72nd cheapest of 78 funds
ICSH vs LQID Dividends
- ICSH 4.13%
- LQID
- ICSH $2.08
- LQID
- ICSH $0.17
- LQID $0.11
- ICSH Oct 1, 2026
- LQID Oct 21, 2026
- ICSH Oct 6, 2026
- LQID Oct 22, 2026
- ICSH Monthly
- LQID Monthly
Distribution history
ICSH vs LQID Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- ICSH 0.4%LQID
- Return per unit of risk
- ICSH 0.87LQID
- Worst fall
- ICSH −0.7%LQID
- Market sensitivity
- ICSH 0.04LQID −0.01
Popular comparisons
- 0.08% · 0.07%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.35% · 0.07%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.08% · 0.10%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.35% · 0.10%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.08% · 0.08%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.35% · 0.08%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.