ICSH ranks 1st and RMME 72nd of 78 funds in the Cash & Ultra-Short Income Category.
ICSH vs RMME
ICSH −0.22pt a year
0.08%0.30%
ICSH 840.8×the volume
1.67M1.98K
ICSH vs RMME Performance
+2.9%+2.9%
- ICSH 0.08%, better
- RMME 0.30%
- ICSH $8.9B
- RMME $40M
- ICSH +3.7%
- RMME
- ICSH 4.12%
- RMME
- ICSH 404
- RMME 7
- ICSH 1.67M sh, better
- RMME 1.98K sh
- ICSH $50.30
- RMME $100.12
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | ICSH | RMME |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A89Higher | F10 |
| Mission | A100Higher | A72 |
| Risk | C50Higher | D35 |
| Tradability | A76Higher | D39 |
| Holdings | A96Higher | D27 |
| Durability | A91Higher | D31 |
Rank among Cash & Ultra-Short Income funds
Same Category. ICSH and RMME are both graded against the same 78 Cash & Ultra-Short Income funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
ICSHA
RMMED
In short
ICSH BlackRock's active cash-parking sleeve, live since 2013: roughly 250 ultra-short investment-grade bonds and money market instruments, run for current income with preservation of capital, at 0.08% a year.
RMME Most cash-parking ETFs only act money-market-ish. RMME actually is one: a Rule 2a-7 government money market fund in an ETF wrapper, priced at 0.30% net of a waiver through January 31, 2027, with a floating share price instead of the traditional fixed $1.00.
Stated mandate
ICSH The fund seeks current income consistent with preservation of capital through actively managed exposure to ultra-short-term investment-grade bonds and money market instruments.
RMME Its objective is to generate current income while preserving capital and maintaining liquidity.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
ICSH vs RMME Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
ICSH vs RMME Cost
Overpaying RMME vs ICSH
$4,460
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
ICSH 0.08%
$1,689
RMME 0.30%
$6,149
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | ICSH | RMME | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $147 | $545 | $398 |
| 20 | $575 | $2,113 | $1,538 |
| 30 | $1,689 | $6,149 | $4,460 |
- 0.08%ICSH, cheaper
- 0.30%RMME
- Middle half of Cash & Ultra-Short Income funds
- Median 0.18%
ICSH 10th cheapest of 78 funds
RMME 69th cheapest of 78 funds
ICSH vs RMME Dividends
- ICSH 4.12%
- RMME
- ICSH $2.07
- RMME
- ICSH $0.18
- RMME $0.29
- ICSH Nov 2, 2026
- RMME Nov 3, 2026
- ICSH Pays Nov 5, 2026
- RMME Nov 4, 2026
- ICSH Monthly
- RMME Monthly
Distribution history
ICSH vs RMME Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- ICSH 0.4%RMME
- Return per unit of risk
- ICSH 0.87RMME
- Worst fall
- ICSH −0.7%RMME
- Market sensitivity
- ICSH 0.04RMME −0.002
Popular comparisons
- 0.08% · 0.09%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.30% · 0.07%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.08% · 0.18%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.30% · 0.06%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.08% · 0.10%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.30% · 0.10%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.