ICSH ranks 1st and SLWS 69th of 78 funds in the Cash & Ultra-Short Income Category.
ICSH vs SLWS
ICSH −0.34pt a year
0.08%0.42%
ICSH 404.9×the volume
1.67M4.12K
ICSH vs SLWS Performance
+2.9%+3.0%
- ICSH 0.08%, better
- SLWS 0.42%
- ICSH $8.9B
- SLWS $400M
- ICSH +3.7%
- SLWS
- ICSH 4.12%
- SLWS
- ICSH 404
- SLWS 214
- ICSH 1.67M sh, better
- SLWS 4.12K sh
- ICSH $50.30
- SLWS $100.40
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | ICSH | SLWS |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A89Higher | F4 |
| Mission | A100Higher | B68 |
| Risk | C50 | C52Higher |
| Tradability | A76Higher | F12 |
| Holdings | A96Higher | B69 |
| Durability | A91Higher | C46 |
Rank among Cash & Ultra-Short Income funds
Same Category. ICSH and SLWS are both graded against the same 78 Cash & Ultra-Short Income funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
ICSHA
SLWSD
In short
ICSH BlackRock's active cash-parking sleeve, live since 2013: roughly 250 ultra-short investment-grade bonds and money market instruments, run for current income with preservation of capital, at 0.08% a year.
SLWS Most ultra-short bond funds are index-run Treasury parking lots. SLWS is a young, actively managed take: a human-picked short-duration portfolio that can roam into international and emerging-market debt while keeping duration near a year or less.
Stated mandate
ICSH The fund seeks current income consistent with preservation of capital through actively managed exposure to ultra-short-term investment-grade bonds and money market instruments.
SLWS The Fund seeks to preserve capital and provide liquidity while generating risk-managed income. It pursues this through actively managed fixed-income investments, with an emphasis on low volatility and a normal duration of one year or less.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
ICSH vs SLWS Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
ICSH vs SLWS Cost
Overpaying SLWS vs ICSH
$6,783
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
ICSH 0.08%
$1,689
SLWS 0.42%
$8,472
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | ICSH | SLWS | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $147 | $759 | $612 |
| 20 | $575 | $2,927 | $2,352 |
| 30 | $1,689 | $8,472 | $6,783 |
- 0.08%ICSH, cheaper
- 0.42%SLWS
- Middle half of Cash & Ultra-Short Income funds
- Median 0.18%
ICSH 10th cheapest of 78 funds
SLWS 75th cheapest of 78 funds
ICSH vs SLWS Dividends
- ICSH 4.12%
- SLWS
- ICSH $2.07
- SLWS
- ICSH $0.18
- SLWS $0.39
- ICSH Nov 2, 2026
- SLWS Oct 29, 2026
- ICSH Pays Nov 5, 2026
- SLWS Oct 30, 2026
- ICSH Monthly
- SLWS Monthly
Distribution history
ICSH vs SLWS Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- ICSH 0.4%SLWS
- Return per unit of risk
- ICSH 0.87SLWS
- Worst fall
- ICSH −0.7%SLWS
- Market sensitivity
- ICSH 0.04SLWS 0.04Same figure. Both funds show the same value, so neither comes out ahead.
ICSH and SLWS in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.08% · 0.09%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.42% · 0.07%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.08% · 0.18%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.42% · 0.06%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.08% · 0.10%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.42% · 0.10%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
