VBIL ranks 3rd and SLWS 69th of 78 funds in the Cash & Ultra-Short Income Category.
SLWS vs VBIL
VBIL −0.36pt a year
0.42%0.06%
VBIL 739.2×the volume
4.12K3.04M
SLWS vs VBIL Performance
+3.0%+3.1%
- SLWS 0.42%
- VBIL 0.06%, better
- SLWS $400M
- VBIL $12.8B
- SLWS
- VBIL +3.7%
- SLWS
- VBIL 3.51%
- SLWS 214
- VBIL 29
- SLWS 4.12K sh
- VBIL 3.04M sh, better
- SLWS $100.40
- VBIL $75.54
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | SLWS | VBIL |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | F4 | A95Higher |
| Mission | B68 | A100Higher |
| Risk | C52Higher | C49 |
| Tradability | F12 | A84Higher |
| Holdings | B69Higher | C42 |
| Durability | C46 | A79Higher |
Rank among Cash & Ultra-Short Income funds
Same Category. SLWS and VBIL are both graded against the same 78 Cash & Ultra-Short Income funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
SLWSD
VBILA
In short
SLWS Most ultra-short bond funds are index-run Treasury parking lots. SLWS is a young, actively managed take: a human-picked short-duration portfolio that can roam into international and emerging-market debt while keeping duration near a year or less.
VBIL Vanguard's cash-parking ETF: roughly two dozen Treasury bills, none maturing more than three months out, at 0.06% a year. It landed in 2025 and undercut most of the T-bill shelf on price.
Stated mandate
SLWS The Fund seeks to preserve capital and provide liquidity while generating risk-managed income. It pursues this through actively managed fixed-income investments, with an emphasis on low volatility and a normal duration of one year or less.
VBIL VBIL seeks to track the performance of a market-weighted Treasury index with an ultra-short-term dollar-weighted average maturity, using a passive approach designed to follow the Bloomberg U.S. Treasury Bills 0-3 Months Index.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
SLWS vs VBIL Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
SLWS vs VBIL Cost
Overpaying SLWS vs VBIL
$7,202
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
SLWS 0.42%
$8,472
VBIL 0.06%
$1,270
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | SLWS | VBIL | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $759 | $110 | $649 |
| 20 | $2,927 | $432 | $2,495 |
| 30 | $8,472 | $1,270 | $7,202 |
- 0.42%SLWS
- 0.06%VBIL, cheaper
- Middle half of Cash & Ultra-Short Income funds
- Median 0.18%
VBIL 6th cheapest of 78 funds
SLWS 75th cheapest of 78 funds
SLWS vs VBIL Dividends
- SLWS
- VBIL 3.51%
- SLWS
- VBIL $2.65
- SLWS $0.39
- VBIL $0.24
- SLWS Oct 29, 2026
- VBIL Nov 2, 2026
- SLWS Oct 30, 2026
- VBIL Nov 4, 2026
- SLWS Monthly
- VBIL Monthly
Distribution history
SLWS vs VBIL Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- SLWS VBIL 0.1%
- Return per unit of risk
- SLWS VBIL −1.04
- Worst fall
- SLWS VBIL −0.1%
- Market sensitivity
- SLWS 0.04VBIL −0.01
SLWS and VBIL in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.42% · 0.08%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.06% · 0.09%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.42% · 0.07%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.06% · 0.14%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.42% · 0.10%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.06% · 0.15%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.



