ICSH ranks 1st and VNLA 34th of 78 funds in the Cash & Ultra-Short Income Category.
ICSH vs VNLA
ICSH −0.15pt a year
0.08%0.23%
ICSH 3.7×the volume
1.67M445K
VNLA +0.1pt
+4.0%+4.1%
ICSH vs VNLA Performance
+21.5%+22.2%
- ICSH 0.08%, better
- VNLA 0.23%
- ICSH $8.9B
- VNLA $3.69B
- ICSH +3.7%
- VNLA +3.7%
- ICSH 4.12%
- VNLA 4.71%, better
- ICSH 404
- VNLA 400
- ICSH 1.67M sh, better
- VNLA 445K sh
- ICSH $50.30
- VNLA $48.65
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | ICSH | VNLA |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A89Higher | F24 |
| Mission | A100 | A100 |
| Risk | C50 | B55Higher |
| Tradability | A76Higher | B66 |
| Holdings | A96Higher | B69 |
| Durability | A91Higher | A82 |
Rank among Cash & Ultra-Short Income funds
Same Category. ICSH and VNLA are both graded against the same 78 Cash & Ultra-Short Income funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
ICSHA
VNLAB
In short
ICSH BlackRock's active cash-parking sleeve, live since 2013: roughly 250 ultra-short investment-grade bonds and money market instruments, run for current income with preservation of capital, at 0.08% a year.
VNLA A cash-plus ETF with a passport: active managers roam global investment-grade debt, keeping duration within 0-2 years of the 3-month T-bill index. In a category packed with bill trackers, this one tries to beat cash, not mirror it.
Stated mandate
ICSH The fund seeks current income consistent with preservation of capital through actively managed exposure to ultra-short-term investment-grade bonds and money market instruments.
VNLA VNLA seeks current income while emphasizing capital preservation and low volatility through an actively managed short-duration fixed-income strategy.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
ICSH vs VNLA Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
ICSH vs VNLA Cost
Overpaying VNLA vs ICSH
$3,070
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
ICSH 0.08%
$1,689
VNLA 0.23%
$4,759
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | ICSH | VNLA | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $147 | $419 | $272 |
| 20 | $575 | $1,630 | $1,055 |
| 30 | $1,689 | $4,759 | $3,070 |
- 0.08%ICSH, cheaper
- 0.23%VNLA
- Middle half of Cash & Ultra-Short Income funds
- Median 0.18%
ICSH 10th cheapest of 78 funds
VNLA 58th cheapest of 78 funds
ICSH vs VNLA Dividends
- ICSH 4.12%
- VNLA 4.71%, better
- ICSH $2.07
- VNLA $2.29
- ICSH $0.18
- VNLA $0.19
- ICSH Nov 2, 2026
- VNLA Oct 30, 2026
- ICSH Pays Nov 5, 2026
- VNLA Pays Nov 5, 2026
- ICSH Monthly
- VNLA Monthly
Distribution history
ICSH vs VNLA Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
- ICSH
- VNLA
Risk facts
- Volatility
- ICSH 0.4%, betterVNLA 0.8%
- Return per unit of risk
- ICSH 0.87VNLA 1.22, better
- Worst fall
- ICSH −0.7%, betterVNLA −1.6%
- Market sensitivity
- ICSH 0.04VNLA 0.10
Popular comparisons
- 0.08% · 0.09%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.23% · 0.07%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.08% · 0.18%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.23% · 0.06%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.08% · 0.10%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.23% · 0.10%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.