SPDW ranks 2nd and IEFA 4th of 20 funds in the Developed International Core Category.
IEFA vs SPDW
SPDW −0.04pt a year
0.07%0.03%
IEFA 3.2×the volume
8.85M2.8M
SPDW +0.6pt
+9.2%+9.8%
IEFA vs SPDW Performance
+48.4%+54.5%
- IEFA 0.07%
- SPDW 0.03%, better
- IEFA $189B
- SPDW $41.4B
- IEFA +13.3%
- SPDW +17.0%, better
- IEFA 3.41%, better
- SPDW 3.07%
- IEFA 2638
- SPDW 2444
- IEFA 8.85M sh, better
- SPDW 2.8M sh
- IEFA $96.14
- SPDW $49.93
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | IEFA | SPDW |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | B68 | A90Higher |
| Mission | A100 | A100 |
| Risk | C44Higher | C43 |
| Tradability | A80Higher | B66 |
| Holdings | A87 | A87 |
| Durability | A85Higher | A76 |
Rank among Developed International Core funds
Same Category. IEFA and SPDW are both graded against the same 20 Developed International Core funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
IEFAA
SPDWA
In short
IEFA Developed markets outside the US and Canada, right down to the small caps: roughly 2,600 stocks for 0.07% a year. The category's workhorse, and one of the biggest, most heavily traded funds on the shelf.
SPDW Developed markets outside the US, roughly 2,400 stocks deep, for three basis points. State Street's 2007-vintage international core: priced at the category floor and built wide rather than mega-cap-only.
Stated mandate
IEFA The fund seeks to track an index of large-, mid- and small-capitalization developed-market equities outside the United States and Canada.
SPDW The fund seeks to provide investment results that generally correspond, before fees and expenses, to the total return performance of the S&P Developed Ex-U.S. BMI Index.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
IEFA vs SPDW Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
IEFA vs SPDW Cost
Overpaying IEFA vs SPDW
$842
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
IEFA 0.07%
$1,480
SPDW 0.03%
$638
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | IEFA | SPDW | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $128 | $55 | $73 |
| 20 | $503 | $216 | $287 |
| 30 | $1,480 | $638 | $842 |
- 0.07%IEFA
- 0.03%SPDW, cheaper
- Middle half of Developed International Core funds
- Median 0.10%
SPDW cheapest of 20 funds
IEFA 7th cheapest of 20 funds
IEFA vs SPDW Dividends
- IEFA 3.41%, better
- SPDW 3.07%
- IEFA $3.29
- SPDW $1.52
- IEFA $1.58
- SPDW $0.72
- IEFA Jun 15, 2026
- SPDW Jun 22, 2026
- IEFA Jun 18, 2026
- SPDW Jun 26, 2026
- IEFA Twice a year
- SPDW Twice a year
Distribution history
IEFA vs SPDW Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
- IEFA
- SPDW
Risk facts
- Volatility
- IEFA 11.9%, betterSPDW 12.7%
- Return per unit of risk
- IEFA 1.20SPDW 1.27, better
- Worst fall
- IEFA −30.0%SPDW −29.9%, better
- Market sensitivity
- IEFA 0.89SPDW 1.03
IEFA and SPDW in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.07% · 0.04%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.03% · 0.04%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.07% · 0.03%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.03% · 0.03%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.07% · 0.03%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.03% · 0.03%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.



