IETC ranks 1st and WELD 5th of 7 funds in the Reshoring & Supply Chain Category.
IETC vs WELD
IETC −0.57pt a year
0.18%0.75%
WELD 1.2×the volume
35K41.2K
IETC +1.2pt
+25.2%+24.0%
IETC vs WELD Performance
−4.3%+13.3%
- IETC 0.18%, better
- WELD 0.75%
- IETC $639M
- WELD $243M
- IETC −4.3%
- WELD +13.3%, better
- IETC 0.40%, better
- WELD 0.26%
- IETC 111
- WELD 22
- IETC 35K sh
- WELD 41.2K sh, better
- IETC $102.26
- WELD $50.02
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | IETC | WELD |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A92Higher | F22 |
| Mission | A78 | |
| Risk | D37 | D38Higher |
| Tradability | A82Higher | B62 |
| Holdings | D37Higher | D33 |
| Durability | A88Higher | B67 |
Rank among Reshoring & Supply Chain funds
Same Category. IETC and WELD are both graded against the same 7 Reshoring & Supply Chain funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
IETCA
WELDD
In short
IETC Most reshoring funds buy factories. This one buys the tech behind them: an active BlackRock portfolio that uses geolocation data to favor U.S. tech firms with more capability, revenue and production at home. Running since 2018.
WELD Most reshoring funds buy the whole factory floor. WELD picks roughly two dozen U.S. industrial names by hand, with a valuation screen built into the mandate, and it was doing this in 2023 before the index giants turned up.
Stated mandate
IETC The fund seeks long-term growth through actively managed exposure to U.S. technology companies with resilient value chains, domestic capabilities, and a greater proportion of U.S. technological capabilities, revenues, and production.
WELD The Fund seeks long-term growth.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
IETC vs WELD Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
IETC vs WELD Cost
Overpaying WELD vs IETC
$10,733
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
IETC 0.18%
$3,749
WELD 0.75%
$14,482
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | IETC | WELD | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $328 | $1,336 | $1,008 |
| 20 | $1,281 | $5,078 | $3,797 |
| 30 | $3,749 | $14,482 | $10,733 |
- 0.18%IETC, cheaper
- 0.75%WELD
- Middle half of Reshoring & Supply Chain funds
- Median 0.70%
IETC cheapest of 7 funds
WELD 5th cheapest of 7 funds
IETC vs WELD Dividends
- IETC 0.40%, better
- WELD 0.26%
- IETC $0.41
- WELD $0.13
- IETC $0.09
- WELD $0.13
- IETC Sep 15, 2026
- WELD Dec 10, 2025
- IETC Sep 18, 2026
- WELD Dec 11, 2025
- IETC Quarterly
- WELD Annual
Distribution history
IETC vs WELD Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- IETC 21.8%, betterWELD 22.8%
- Return per unit of risk
- IETC 0.94, betterWELD 0.87
- Worst fall
- IETC −38.5%WELD −27.3%
- Market sensitivity
- IETC 1.24WELD 1.29
Popular comparisons
- 0.18% · 0.50%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.75% · 0.50%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.18% · 0.40%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.75% · 0.40%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.18% · 0.70%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.75% · 0.70%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.