IGLB ranks 1st and ZTEN 4th of 7 funds in the Investment Grade Corporate (10+ Year) Category.
IGLB vs ZTEN
IGLB −0.11pt a year
0.04%0.15%
IGLB 884.6×the volume
2.2M2.49K
IGLB vs ZTEN Performance
−3.5%−1.1%
- IGLB 0.04%, better
- ZTEN 0.15%
- IGLB $2.71B
- ZTEN $29M
- IGLB −3.5%
- ZTEN −1.1%, better
- IGLB 5.61%
- ZTEN 5.76%, better
- IGLB 3799
- ZTEN 228
- IGLB 2.2M sh, better
- ZTEN 2.49K sh
- IGLB $47.01
- ZTEN $48.31
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | IGLB | ZTEN |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A80Higher | C47 |
| Mission | A100Higher | A89 |
| Risk | C45 | B63Higher |
| Tradability | A80Higher | D34 |
| Holdings | A86Higher | B57 |
| Durability | A76Higher | C43 |
Rank among Investment Grade Corporate (10+ Year) funds
Same Category. IGLB and ZTEN are both graded against the same 7 Investment Grade Corporate (10+ Year) funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
IGLBA
ZTENB
In short
IGLB The long end of the iShares corporate ladder: only investment-grade company bonds with more than ten years left to run. Interest-rate sensitivity isn't a side effect here, it's the design.
ZTEN Most corporate bond funds smear across a maturity range. ZTEN parks on one point of the curve: investment-grade corporates with roughly nine and a half to ten and a half years left, held in even slices and refreshed monthly.
Stated mandate
IGLB The fund seeks to track an index of U.S. dollar-denominated investment-grade corporate bonds with remaining maturities longer than ten years. It provides exposure to long-duration, high-quality corporate credit and seeks income.
ZTEN The fund seeks to track, before fees and expenses, the price and yield performance of the ICE 10-Year US Target Maturity Corporate Index.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
IGLB vs ZTEN Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
IGLB vs ZTEN Cost
Overpaying ZTEN vs IGLB
$2,288
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
IGLB 0.04%
$849
ZTEN 0.15%
$3,137
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | IGLB | ZTEN | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $73 | $274 | $201 |
| 20 | $288 | $1,071 | $783 |
| 30 | $849 | $3,137 | $2,288 |
- 0.04%IGLB, cheaper
- 0.15%ZTEN
- Middle half of Investment Grade Corporate (10+ Year) funds
- Median 0.15%
IGLB 2nd cheapest of 7 funds
ZTEN 4th cheapest of 7 funds
IGLB vs ZTEN Dividends
- IGLB 5.61%
- ZTEN 5.76%, better
- IGLB $2.64
- ZTEN $2.78
- IGLB $0.24
- ZTEN $0.23
- IGLB Oct 1, 2026
- ZTEN Oct 27, 2026
- IGLB Oct 6, 2026
- ZTEN Oct 28, 2026
- IGLB Monthly
- ZTEN Monthly
Distribution history
IGLB vs ZTEN Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- IGLB 11.3%ZTEN 5.7%
- Return per unit of risk
- IGLB 0.25ZTEN −0.11
- Worst fall
- IGLB −34.0%ZTEN −5.8%
- Market sensitivity
- IGLB 1.92ZTEN 0.22
Popular comparisons
- 0.04% · 0.04%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.15% · 0.04%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.04% · 0.03%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.15% · 0.03%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.04% · 0.15%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.15% · 0.15%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.