VCLT ranks 2nd and ZTEN 4th of 7 funds in the Investment Grade Corporate (10+ Year) Category.
VCLT vs ZTEN
VCLT −0.12pt a year
0.03%0.15%
VCLT 2035.1×the volume
5.06M2.49K
VCLT vs ZTEN Performance
−3.6%−1.1%
- VCLT 0.03%, better
- ZTEN 0.15%
- VCLT $8.3B
- ZTEN $29M
- VCLT −3.6%
- ZTEN −1.1%, better
- VCLT 5.85%, better
- ZTEN 5.76%
- VCLT 2564
- ZTEN 228
- VCLT 5.06M sh, better
- ZTEN 2.49K sh
- VCLT $70.63
- ZTEN $48.31
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | VCLT | ZTEN |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A80Higher | C47 |
| Mission | A100Higher | A89 |
| Risk | D37 | B63Higher |
| Tradability | B58Higher | D34 |
| Holdings | A77Higher | B57 |
| Durability | A88Higher | C43 |
Rank among Investment Grade Corporate (10+ Year) funds
Same Category. VCLT and ZTEN are both graded against the same 7 Investment Grade Corporate (10+ Year) funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
VCLTA
ZTENB
In short
VCLT The long end of investment-grade credit, held plain. VCLT tracks an index of corporate bonds with 10+ years left to run, costs three cents per $100 a year, and pays monthly. Maximum rate sensitivity, minimum toll.
ZTEN Most corporate bond funds smear across a maturity range. ZTEN parks on one point of the curve: investment-grade corporates with roughly nine and a half to ten and a half years left, held in even slices and refreshed monthly.
Stated mandate
VCLT VCLT seeks to follow a market-weighted corporate bond index with long-term average maturity. It uses passive index sampling, maintains maturity consistent with the index, and normally invests at least 80% of assets in index bonds.
ZTEN The fund seeks to track, before fees and expenses, the price and yield performance of the ICE 10-Year US Target Maturity Corporate Index.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
VCLT vs ZTEN Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
VCLT vs ZTEN Cost
Overpaying ZTEN vs VCLT
$2,499
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
VCLT 0.03%
$638
ZTEN 0.15%
$3,137
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | VCLT | ZTEN | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $55 | $274 | $219 |
| 20 | $216 | $1,071 | $855 |
| 30 | $638 | $3,137 | $2,499 |
- 0.03%VCLT, cheaper
- 0.15%ZTEN
- Middle half of Investment Grade Corporate (10+ Year) funds
- Median 0.15%
VCLT cheapest of 7 funds
ZTEN 4th cheapest of 7 funds
VCLT vs ZTEN Dividends
- VCLT 5.85%, better
- ZTEN 5.76%
- VCLT $4.13
- ZTEN $2.78
- VCLT $0.35
- ZTEN $0.23
- VCLT Oct 1, 2026
- ZTEN Oct 27, 2026
- VCLT Oct 5, 2026
- ZTEN Oct 28, 2026
- VCLT Monthly
- ZTEN Monthly
Distribution history
VCLT vs ZTEN Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- VCLT 11.4%ZTEN 5.7%
- Return per unit of risk
- VCLT 0.23ZTEN −0.11
- Worst fall
- VCLT −34.4%ZTEN −5.8%
- Market sensitivity
- VCLT 1.97ZTEN 0.22
Popular comparisons
- 0.03% · 0.04%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.15% · 0.04%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.03% · 0.04%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.15% · 0.04%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.03% · 0.15%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.15% · 0.15%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.