IJUL ranks 4th and YDEC 26th of 26 funds in the Developed International Buffer 15% Category.
IJUL vs YDEC
IJUL −0.05pt a year
0.85%0.90%
IJUL 4.9×the volume
44.8K9.13K
IJUL +2.9pt
+7.8%+4.9%
IJUL vs YDEC Performance
+45.8%+27.0%
- IJUL 0.85%, better
- YDEC 0.90%
- IJUL $256M
- YDEC $168M
- IJUL +9.9%, better
- YDEC +8.2%
- IJUL 0.00%
- YDEC
- IJUL 3
- YDEC 3
- IJUL 44.8K sh, better
- YDEC 9.13K sh
- IJUL $35.98
- YDEC $27.97
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | IJUL | YDEC |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | D38Higher | F6 |
| Mission | ||
| Risk | C52Higher | D39 |
| Tradability | A81Higher | B56 |
| Holdings | B57 | |
| Durability | A91 | A92Higher |
Rank among Developed International Buffer 15% funds
Same Category. IJUL and YDEC are both graded against the same 26 Developed International Buffer 15% funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
IJULB
YDECD
In short
IJUL Most buffer ETFs babysit the S&P 500. IJUL points the same 15% downside cushion at developed markets outside the US, tracking an EAFE index fund up to a cap over a one-year outcome period that restarts each July.
YDEC Most buffer ETFs babysit the S&P 500. This one points the same machinery overseas: it tracks the price return of the iShares MSCI EAFE ETF with the first 15% of losses absorbed and the upside capped, on a one-year clock that resets each December.
Stated mandate
IJUL The fund seeks to track the return of the iShares MSCI EAFE ETF (EFA) up to a predetermined cap while protecting against the first 15% of losses during the outcome period.
YDEC The Fund seeks returns matching the price return of the iShares MSCI EAFE ETF, subject to a 13.03% upside cap and protection against the first 15% of losses during the current outcome period.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
IJUL vs YDEC Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
IJUL vs YDEC Cost
Overpaying YDEC vs IJUL
$841
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
IJUL 0.85%
$16,199
YDEC 0.90%
$17,040
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | IJUL | YDEC | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $1,508 | $1,593 | $85 |
| 20 | $5,706 | $6,015 | $309 |
| 30 | $16,199 | $17,040 | $841 |
- 0.85%IJUL, cheaper
- 0.90%YDEC
- Middle half of Developed International Buffer 15% funds
- Median 0.85%
IJUL 11th cheapest of 26 funds
YDEC 23rd cheapest of 26 funds
IJUL vs YDEC Dividends
- IJUL 0.00%
- YDEC
- IJUL None
- YDEC None
Distribution history
IJUL vs YDEC Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
- IJUL
- YDEC
Risk facts
- Volatility
- IJUL 7.4%, betterYDEC 7.6%
- Return per unit of risk
- IJUL 1.07, betterYDEC 0.80
- Worst fall
- IJUL −14.6%, betterYDEC −23.3%
- Market sensitivity
- IJUL 0.46YDEC 0.48
Popular comparisons
- 0.85% · 0.69%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.90% · 0.69%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.85% · 0.74%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.90% · 0.74%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.85% · 0.85%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.90% · 0.85%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.