ILCG ranks 2nd and QQQG 28th of 35 funds in the US Growth Index Category.
ILCG vs QQQG
ILCG −0.45pt a year
0.04%0.49%
ILCG 2.6×the volume
70.4K26.7K
ILCG vs QQQG Performance
+3.2%+17.7%
- ILCG 0.04%, better
- QQQG 0.49%
- ILCG $3B
- QQQG $54M
- ILCG +3.2%
- QQQG +17.7%, better
- ILCG 0.44%, better
- QQQG 0.07%
- ILCG 328
- QQQG 51
- ILCG 70.4K sh, better
- QQQG 26.7K sh
- ILCG $109.98
- QQQG $29.12
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | ILCG | QQQG |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A96Higher | F18 |
| Mission | A100Higher | A82 |
| Risk | C44 | C47Higher |
| Tradability | B64Higher | C44 |
| Holdings | C49 | C50Higher |
| Durability | B64Higher | F17 |
Rank among US Growth Index funds
Same Category. ILCG and QQQG are both graded against the same 35 US Growth Index funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
ILCGA
QQQGC
In short
ILCG Growth by Morningstar's rulebook. A 2004-vintage iShares fund that screens large and mid caps for above-average earnings, sales, cash-flow and book-value growth, and charges four basis points to do it.
QQQG Pacer took its Cash Cows playbook up to the Nasdaq-100: screen the index for free-cash-flow strength and momentum, then keep about 50 names. A concentrated growth sleeve with a boutique price tag.
Stated mandate
ILCG The fund aims to follow an index of U.S. large- and mid-cap stocks chosen for above-average earnings, sales, cash-flow, and book-value growth.
QQQG The fund seeks to track the Pacer Nasdaq-100 Top 50 Cash Cows Growth Leaders Index before fees and expenses. Its rules-based approach screens Nasdaq-100 companies using projected cash-flow and earnings measures, free-cash-flow margin, and price momentum.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
ILCG vs QQQG Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
ILCG vs QQQG Cost
Overpaying QQQG vs ILCG
$8,943
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
ILCG 0.04%
$849
QQQG 0.49%
$9,792
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | ILCG | QQQG | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $73 | $883 | $810 |
| 20 | $288 | $3,394 | $3,106 |
| 30 | $849 | $9,792 | $8,943 |
- 0.04%ILCG, cheaper
- 0.49%QQQG
- Middle half of US Growth Index funds
- Median 0.18%
ILCG 2nd cheapest of 35 funds
QQQG 28th cheapest of 35 funds
ILCG vs QQQG Dividends
- ILCG 0.44%, better
- QQQG 0.07%
- ILCG $0.48
- QQQG $0.02
- ILCG $0.14
- QQQG $0.01
- ILCG Sep 15, 2026
- QQQG Sep 3, 2026
- ILCG Sep 18, 2026
- QQQG Sep 8, 2026
- ILCG Quarterly
- QQQG Quarterly
Distribution history
ILCG vs QQQG Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- ILCG 17.8%QQQG 23.3%
- Return per unit of risk
- ILCG 1.06QQQG 0.61
- Worst fall
- ILCG −35.4%QQQG −23.6%
- Market sensitivity
- ILCG 1.23QQQG 1.41
ILCG and QQQG in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.04% · 0.04%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.49% · 0.04%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.04% · 0.06%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.49% · 0.06%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.04% · 0.04%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.49% · 0.04%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
