IMCG ranks 2nd and ILCG 4th of 35 funds in the US Growth Index Category.
ILCG vs IMCG
ILCG −0.02pt a year
0.04%0.06%
IMCG 2.0×the volume
69.6K139K
ILCG +2.8pt
+16.9%+14.1%
ILCG vs IMCG Performance
+53.4%+28.0%
- ILCG 0.04%, better
- IMCG 0.06%
- ILCG $2.86B
- IMCG $3.9B
- ILCG +4.3%
- IMCG +15.5%, better
- ILCG 0.44%
- IMCG 0.67%, better
- ILCG 328
- IMCG 262
- ILCG 69.6K sh
- IMCG 139K sh, better
- ILCG $104.77
- IMCG $90.22
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | ILCG | IMCG |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A96Higher | A78 |
| Mission | A100Higher | A96 |
| Risk | C42 | A74Higher |
| Tradability | B63Higher | B62 |
| Holdings | C52 | A76Higher |
| Durability | B66 | B69Higher |
Rank among US Growth Index funds
Same Category. ILCG and IMCG are both graded against the same 35 US Growth Index funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
ILCGA
IMCGA
In short
ILCG Growth by Morningstar's rulebook. A 2004-vintage iShares fund that screens large and mid caps for above-average earnings, sales, cash-flow and book-value growth, and charges four basis points to do it.
IMCG Growth investing usually means megacaps. IMCG works the middle of the market instead: roughly 300 mid-cap growth names, indexed since 2004, for six basis points a year.
Stated mandate
ILCG The fund aims to follow an index of U.S. large- and mid-cap stocks chosen for above-average earnings, sales, cash-flow, and book-value growth.
IMCG The Fund seeks to track an index of U.S. mid-capitalization equities with growth characteristics. Its strategy uses representative sampling and generally invests at least 80% of assets in securities from the Underlying Index.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
ILCG vs IMCG Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
ILCG vs IMCG Cost
Overpaying IMCG vs ILCG
$421
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
ILCG 0.04%
$849
IMCG 0.06%
$1,270
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | ILCG | IMCG | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $73 | $110 | $37 |
| 20 | $288 | $432 | $144 |
| 30 | $849 | $1,270 | $421 |
- 0.04%ILCG, cheaper
- 0.06%IMCG
- Middle half of US Growth Index funds
- Median 0.18%
ILCG 2nd cheapest of 35 funds
IMCG 9th cheapest of 35 funds
ILCG vs IMCG Dividends
- ILCG 0.44%
- IMCG 0.67%, better
- ILCG $0.48
- IMCG $0.62
- ILCG $0.14
- IMCG $0.19
- ILCG Sep 15, 2026
- IMCG Sep 15, 2026
- ILCG Sep 18, 2026
- IMCG Sep 18, 2026
- ILCG Quarterly
- IMCG Quarterly
Distribution history
ILCG vs IMCG Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
- ILCG
- IMCG
Risk facts
- Volatility
- ILCG 17.8%IMCG 16.6%, better
- Return per unit of risk
- ILCG 1.06, betterIMCG 0.97
- Worst fall
- ILCG −35.4%IMCG −35.1%, better
- Market sensitivity
- ILCG 1.23IMCG 1.13
ILCG and IMCG in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.04% · 0.04%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.06% · 0.05%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.04% · 0.04%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.06% · 0.04%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.04% · 0.03%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.06% · 0.04%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

