ILCV ranks 2nd and JHMM 36th of 99 funds in the US Multifactor Category.
ILCV vs JHMM
ILCV −0.37pt a year
0.04%0.41%
JHMM 8.9×the volume
25.1K224K
ILCV +0.6pt
+12.2%+11.6%
ILCV vs JHMM Performance
+79.9%+39.1%
- ILCV 0.04%, better
- JHMM 0.41%
- ILCV $1.37B
- JHMM $6B
- ILCV +22.4%, better
- JHMM +16.2%
- ILCV 1.50%, better
- JHMM 0.89%
- ILCV 374
- JHMM 659
- ILCV 25.1K sh
- JHMM 224K sh, better
- ILCV $108.28
- JHMM $72.19
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | ILCV | JHMM |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A99Higher | D30 |
| Mission | A82 | A100Higher |
| Risk | A91Higher | C46 |
| Tradability | B62 | A77Higher |
| Holdings | D39 | A87Higher |
| Durability | A82Higher | A77 |
Rank among US Multifactor funds
Same Category. ILCV and JHMM are both graded against the same 99 US Multifactor funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
ILCVA
JHMMB
In short
ILCV Value done the thorough way: roughly 400 large- and mid-cap US stocks screened on five separate value measures, not just cheap book value. Running since 2004 at four basis points, it's one of the cheapest tickets into the value factor.
JHMM The mid-cap slice of John Hancock's Dimensional-built index suite: roughly 700 stocks sorted by size, price and profitability instead of market cap alone, at 0.41% net of a waiver through July 31, 2027.
Stated mandate
ILCV The fund seeks to track an index of U.S. large- and mid-cap stocks selected with value-oriented measures including forward earnings, book value, sales, cash flow, and dividend yield.
JHMM The fund seeks to track, before fees and expenses, the performance of the John Hancock Dimensional Mid Cap Index.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
ILCV vs JHMM Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
ILCV vs JHMM Cost
Overpaying JHMM vs ILCV
$7,432
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
ILCV 0.04%
$849
JHMM 0.41%
$8,281
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | ILCV | JHMM | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $73 | $741 | $668 |
| 20 | $288 | $2,860 | $2,572 |
| 30 | $849 | $8,281 | $7,432 |
- 0.04%ILCV, cheaper
- 0.41%JHMM
- Middle half of US Multifactor funds
- Median 0.29%
ILCV cheapest of 99 funds
JHMM 69th cheapest of 99 funds
ILCV vs JHMM Dividends
- ILCV 1.50%, better
- JHMM 0.89%
- ILCV $1.65
- JHMM $0.66
- ILCV $0.42
- JHMM $0.29
- ILCV Sep 15, 2026
- JHMM Jun 26, 2026
- ILCV Sep 18, 2026
- JHMM Jun 30, 2026
- ILCV Quarterly
- JHMM Twice a year
Distribution history
ILCV vs JHMM Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
- ILCV
- JHMM
Risk facts
- Volatility
- ILCV 10.7%, betterJHMM 14.4%
- Return per unit of risk
- ILCV 1.57, betterJHMM 0.99
- Worst fall
- ILCV −18.6%, betterJHMM −24.1%
- Market sensitivity
- ILCV 0.82JHMM 0.98
Popular comparisons
- 0.04% · 0.06%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.41% · 0.06%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.04% · 0.04%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.41% · 0.04%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.04% · 0.14%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.41% · 0.14%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.