VONV ranks 1st and JHMM 36th of 99 funds in the US Multifactor Category.
JHMM vs VONV
VONV −0.35pt a year
0.41%0.06%
VONV 3.5×the volume
224K776K
VONV +0.3pt
+11.6%+11.9%
JHMM vs VONV Performance
+39.1%+73.9%
- JHMM 0.41%
- VONV 0.06%, better
- JHMM $6B
- VONV $21.7B
- JHMM +16.2%
- VONV +30.6%, better
- JHMM 0.89%
- VONV 1.51%, better
- JHMM 659
- VONV 887
- JHMM 224K sh
- VONV 776K sh, better
- JHMM $72.19
- VONV $112.88
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | JHMM | VONV |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | D30 | A96Higher |
| Mission | A100 | A100 |
| Risk | C46 | A89Higher |
| Tradability | A77Higher | B59 |
| Holdings | A87Higher | C49 |
| Durability | A77 | A92Higher |
Rank among US Multifactor funds
Same Category. JHMM and VONV are both graded against the same 99 US Multifactor funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
JHMMB
VONVA
In short
JHMM The mid-cap slice of John Hancock's Dimensional-built index suite: roughly 700 stocks sorted by size, price and profitability instead of market cap alone, at 0.41% net of a waiver through July 31, 2027.
VONV The plain-vanilla value trade, done cheap: about 900 large US value stocks, full replication of the Russell 1000 Value Index, 0.06% a year. No factor cocktail, no premium price tag, and one of the strongest implementations in its factor peer group.
Stated mandate
JHMM The fund seeks to track, before fees and expenses, the performance of the John Hancock Dimensional Mid Cap Index.
VONV The fund seeks to track the Russell 1000 Value Index, representing large-capitalization value stocks in the United States. It uses passive indexing and full replication to remain closely aligned with that benchmark.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
JHMM vs VONV Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
JHMM vs VONV Cost
Overpaying JHMM vs VONV
$7,011
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
JHMM 0.41%
$8,281
VONV 0.06%
$1,270
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | JHMM | VONV | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $741 | $110 | $631 |
| 20 | $2,860 | $432 | $2,428 |
| 30 | $8,281 | $1,270 | $7,011 |
- 0.41%JHMM
- 0.06%VONV, cheaper
- Middle half of US Multifactor funds
- Median 0.29%
VONV 4th cheapest of 99 funds
JHMM 69th cheapest of 99 funds
JHMM vs VONV Dividends
- JHMM 0.89%
- VONV 1.51%, better
- JHMM $0.66
- VONV $1.74
- JHMM $0.29
- VONV $0.42
- JHMM Jun 26, 2026
- VONV Sep 23, 2026
- JHMM Jun 30, 2026
- VONV Sep 25, 2026
- JHMM Twice a year
- VONV Quarterly
Distribution history
JHMM vs VONV Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
- JHMM
- VONV
Risk facts
- Volatility
- JHMM 14.4%VONV 12.1%, better
- Return per unit of risk
- JHMM 0.99VONV 1.43, better
- Worst fall
- JHMM −24.1%VONV −18.9%, better
- Market sensitivity
- JHMM 0.98VONV 0.85
JHMM and VONV in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.41% · 0.04%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.06% · 0.04%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.41% · 0.04%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.06% · 0.04%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.41% · 0.14%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.06% · 0.14%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

