ILCV ranks 2nd and JHSC 67th of 99 funds in the US Multifactor Category.
ILCV vs JHSC
ILCV −0.38pt a year
0.04%0.42%
JHSC 1.6×the volume
25.1K40K
ILCV +6.4pt
+12.5%+6.1%
ILCV vs JHSC Performance
+79.9%+34.5%
- ILCV 0.04%, better
- JHSC 0.42%
- ILCV $1.37B
- JHSC $691M
- ILCV +22.4%, better
- JHSC +17.8%
- ILCV 1.50%, better
- JHSC 1.01%
- ILCV 374
- JHSC 495
- ILCV 25.1K sh
- JHSC 40K sh, better
- ILCV $108.28
- JHSC $46.87
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | ILCV | JHSC |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A99Higher | D30 |
| Mission | A82Higher | A74 |
| Risk | A91Higher | D33 |
| Tradability | B62Higher | D39 |
| Holdings | D39 | A84Higher |
| Durability | A82Higher | B55 |
Rank among US Multifactor funds
Same Category. ILCV and JHSC are both graded against the same 99 US Multifactor funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
ILCVA
JHSCC
In short
ILCV Value done the thorough way: roughly 400 large- and mid-cap US stocks screened on five separate value measures, not just cheap book value. Running since 2004 at four basis points, it's one of the cheapest tickets into the value factor.
JHSC Dimensional Fund Advisors built the index; John Hancock put it in an ETF wrapper. JHSC holds roughly 500 US small caps, leaning toward the cheaper and more profitable ones, with a 4% cap on any single company.
Stated mandate
ILCV The fund seeks to track an index of U.S. large- and mid-cap stocks selected with value-oriented measures including forward earnings, book value, sales, cash flow, and dividend yield.
JHSC The fund seeks investment results that closely correspond, before fees and expenses, to the performance of the John Hancock Dimensional Small Cap Index.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
ILCV vs JHSC Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
ILCV vs JHSC Cost
Overpaying JHSC vs ILCV
$7,623
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
ILCV 0.04%
$849
JHSC 0.42%
$8,472
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | ILCV | JHSC | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $73 | $759 | $686 |
| 20 | $288 | $2,927 | $2,639 |
| 30 | $849 | $8,472 | $7,623 |
- 0.04%ILCV, cheaper
- 0.42%JHSC
- Middle half of US Multifactor funds
- Median 0.29%
ILCV cheapest of 99 funds
JHSC 70th cheapest of 99 funds
ILCV vs JHSC Dividends
- ILCV 1.50%, better
- JHSC 1.01%
- ILCV $1.65
- JHSC $0.49
- ILCV $0.42
- JHSC $0.19
- ILCV Sep 15, 2026
- JHSC Jun 26, 2026
- ILCV Sep 18, 2026
- JHSC Jun 30, 2026
- ILCV Quarterly
- JHSC Twice a year
Distribution history
ILCV vs JHSC Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
- ILCV
- JHSC
Risk facts
- Volatility
- ILCV 10.7%, betterJHSC 16.7%
- Return per unit of risk
- ILCV 1.57, betterJHSC 0.78
- Worst fall
- ILCV −18.6%, betterJHSC −25.2%
- Market sensitivity
- ILCV 0.82JHSC 1.02
Popular comparisons
- 0.04% · 0.06%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.42% · 0.06%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.04% · 0.04%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.42% · 0.04%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.04% · 0.14%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.42% · 0.14%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.