VONV ranks 1st and JHSC 67th of 99 funds in the US Multifactor Category.
JHSC vs VONV
VONV −0.36pt a year
0.42%0.06%
VONV 19.4×the volume
40K776K
VONV +5.6pt
+6.1%+11.7%
JHSC vs VONV Performance
+34.5%+73.9%
- JHSC 0.42%
- VONV 0.06%, better
- JHSC $691M
- VONV $21.7B
- JHSC +17.8%
- VONV +30.6%, better
- JHSC 1.01%
- VONV 1.51%, better
- JHSC 495
- VONV 887
- JHSC 40K sh
- VONV 776K sh, better
- JHSC $46.87
- VONV $112.88
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | JHSC | VONV |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | D30 | A96Higher |
| Mission | A74 | A100Higher |
| Risk | D33 | A89Higher |
| Tradability | D39 | B59Higher |
| Holdings | A84Higher | C49 |
| Durability | B55 | A92Higher |
Rank among US Multifactor funds
Same Category. JHSC and VONV are both graded against the same 99 US Multifactor funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
JHSCC
VONVA
In short
JHSC Dimensional Fund Advisors built the index; John Hancock put it in an ETF wrapper. JHSC holds roughly 500 US small caps, leaning toward the cheaper and more profitable ones, with a 4% cap on any single company.
VONV The plain-vanilla value trade, done cheap: about 900 large US value stocks, full replication of the Russell 1000 Value Index, 0.06% a year. No factor cocktail, no premium price tag, and one of the strongest implementations in its factor peer group.
Stated mandate
JHSC The fund seeks investment results that closely correspond, before fees and expenses, to the performance of the John Hancock Dimensional Small Cap Index.
VONV The fund seeks to track the Russell 1000 Value Index, representing large-capitalization value stocks in the United States. It uses passive indexing and full replication to remain closely aligned with that benchmark.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
JHSC vs VONV Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
JHSC vs VONV Cost
Overpaying JHSC vs VONV
$7,202
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
JHSC 0.42%
$8,472
VONV 0.06%
$1,270
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | JHSC | VONV | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $759 | $110 | $649 |
| 20 | $2,927 | $432 | $2,495 |
| 30 | $8,472 | $1,270 | $7,202 |
- 0.42%JHSC
- 0.06%VONV, cheaper
- Middle half of US Multifactor funds
- Median 0.29%
VONV 4th cheapest of 99 funds
JHSC 70th cheapest of 99 funds
JHSC vs VONV Dividends
- JHSC 1.01%
- VONV 1.51%, better
- JHSC $0.49
- VONV $1.74
- JHSC $0.19
- VONV $0.42
- JHSC Jun 26, 2026
- VONV Sep 23, 2026
- JHSC Jun 30, 2026
- VONV Sep 25, 2026
- JHSC Twice a year
- VONV Quarterly
Distribution history
JHSC vs VONV Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
- JHSC
- VONV
Risk facts
- Volatility
- JHSC 16.7%VONV 12.1%, better
- Return per unit of risk
- JHSC 0.78VONV 1.43, better
- Worst fall
- JHSC −25.2%VONV −18.9%, better
- Market sensitivity
- JHSC 1.02VONV 0.85
JHSC and VONV in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.42% · 0.04%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.06% · 0.04%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.42% · 0.04%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.06% · 0.04%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.42% · 0.14%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.06% · 0.14%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

