ILCV ranks 2nd and MBCE 99th of 99 funds in the US Multifactor Category.
ILCV vs MBCE
5.9%by weight
ILCV −0.97pt a year
0.04%1.01%
ILCV 1.2×the volume
24.4K19.9K
ILCV +8.5pt
+12.6%+4.1%
ILCV vs MBCE Performance
+81.1%+22.0%
- ILCV 0.04%, better
- MBCE 1.01%
- ILCV $1.37B
- MBCE $199M
- ILCV +21.0%, better
- MBCE −2.4%
- ILCV 1.51%, better
- MBCE 0.30%
- ILCV 375
- MBCE 14
- ILCV 24.4K sh, better
- MBCE 19.9K sh
- ILCV $109.27
- MBCE $36.49
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | ILCV | MBCE |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A99Higher | F0 |
| Mission | A82Higher | D33 |
| Risk | A90Higher | F17 |
| Tradability | B64Higher | D28 |
| Holdings | D39 | |
| Durability | A82Higher | D36 |
Rank among US Multifactor funds
Same Category. ILCV and MBCE are both graded against the same 99 US Multifactor funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
ILCVA
MBCEF
In short
ILCV Value done the thorough way: roughly 400 large- and mid-cap US stocks screened on five separate value measures, not just cheap book value. Running since 2004 at four basis points, it's one of the cheapest tickets into the value factor.
MBCE Monarch screens the S&P 500 down to the blue chips its own in-house index rates highest on growth and profitability. A focused, rules-based cut of large-cap America, priced at 1.01% a year with no fee waiver, above the category median.
Stated mandate
ILCV The fund seeks to track an index of U.S. large- and mid-cap stocks selected with value-oriented measures including forward earnings, book value, sales, cash flow, and dividend yield.
MBCE The Fund seeks to track, before fees and expenses, the performance of the Monarch Blue Chips Elite Index.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
ILCV vs MBCE Holdings
How ILCV and MBCE differ
5.9%
Shared holdings make up 22.3% of MBCE and 5.9% of ILCV.
Level by level
- Holdings5.9%
- Country99.2%
Sector
No Sector split for MBCE.
Country, concentration and asset class
Country
| Country | More in ILCVMore in MBCE | ILCV | MBCE |
|---|---|---|---|
| United States | MBCE +0.8 points | 99.2% | 100.0% |
| Other countries (5) | ILCV +0.8 points | 0.8% | 0.0% |
Concentration
- ILCV34.4%
- MBCE90.1%
- ILCV372
- MBCE13
Asset class
- ILCV
- Equity
- MBCE
- Equity
Holdings
- Only in ILCV367
- In both5
- Only in MBCE8
Only in ILCV
367 securities, 94.0% of ILCV by weight
- Microsoft8.45%
- Apple7.24%
- Berkshire Hathaway Inc Class B2.84%
- JPMorgan Chase & Co2.60%
- Meta Platforms Class A2.50%
- Exxonmobil Holdings Corp2.14%
- Alphabet Class A2.04%
- Johnson & Johnson1.89%
- Alphabet Class C1.65%
- AbbVie1.46%
- Micron Technology1.35%
- Chevron1.23%
- Cisco Systems Inc1.22%
- Procter & Gamble1.06%
- UnitedHealth Group1.05%
- Coca-Cola1.03%
- Merck & Co Inc1.03%
- Visa Class A1.00%
- Bank of America0.94%
- Home Depot0.93%
- Philip Morris International0.92%
- Walmart0.91%
- Goldman Sachs Group0.77%
- Rtx0.76%
- Thermo Fisher Scientific0.75%
- Wells Fargo0.73%
- Costco Wholesale Corp0.71%
- International Business Machines Co0.69%
- Linde PLC0.66%
- Morgan Stanley0.64%
- Mastercard Class A0.63%
- Citigroup0.60%
- Gilead Sciences0.58%
- Qualcomm0.56%
- Walt Disney0.54%
- Salesforce0.52%
- Pepsico0.52%
- Mcdonalds Corp0.52%
- Verizon Communications Inc0.52%
- Abbott Laboratories0.51%
- Conocophillips0.51%
- Union Pacific0.51%
- Nextera Energy0.49%
- Pfizer0.49%
- BlackRock0.46%
- Danaher0.43%
- Accenture PLC Class A0.43%
- AT&T0.41%
- Progressive0.38%
- Altria Group Inc0.36%
Only in MBCE
8 securities, 74.5% of MBCE by weight
- Bbh Sweep Vehicle46.10%
- Advanced Micro Devices, Inc.4.75%
- Palantir Technologies, Inc.4.38%
- NVIDIA Corporation4.11%
- GE Aerospace Company3.98%
- Broadcom, Inc.3.90%
- Applied Materials, Inc.3.77%
- Lam Research Corporation3.51%
Weight gaps
All 5 Holdings in both funds, largest gap first.
| Holding | More in ILCVMore in MBCE | ILCV | MBCE |
|---|---|---|---|
| Texas Instrument | MBCE +4.66 points | 0.45% | 5.11% |
| Amgen Inc | MBCE +4.09 points | 0.71% | 4.80% |
| Tesla Inc | MBCE +3.58 points | 1.24% | 4.82% |
| Caterpillar Inc | MBCE +3.08 points | 0.38% | 3.46% |
| Amazon.com Inc | MBCE +1.02 points | 3.08% | 4.10% |
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
ILCV vs MBCE Cost
Overpaying MBCE vs ILCV
$18,001
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
ILCV 0.04%
$849
MBCE 1.01%
$18,850
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | ILCV | MBCE | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $73 | $1,780 | $1,707 |
| 20 | $288 | $6,686 | $6,398 |
| 30 | $849 | $18,850 | $18,001 |
- 0.04%ILCV, cheaper
- 1.01%MBCE
- Middle half of US Multifactor funds
- Median 0.29%
ILCV cheapest of 99 funds
MBCE 99th cheapest of 99 funds
ILCV vs MBCE Dividends
- ILCV 1.51%, better
- MBCE 0.30%
- ILCV $1.65
- MBCE $0.11
- ILCV $0.42
- MBCE $0.04
- ILCV Sep 15, 2026
- MBCE Sep 24, 2026
- ILCV Sep 18, 2026
- MBCE Sep 29, 2026
- ILCV Quarterly
- MBCE Twice a year
Distribution history
ILCV vs MBCE Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
- ILCV
- MBCE
Risk facts
- Volatility
- ILCV 10.7%, betterMBCE 16.7%
- Return per unit of risk
- ILCV 1.57, betterMBCE 0.50
- Worst fall
- ILCV −18.6%, betterMBCE −30.6%
- Market sensitivity
- ILCV 0.82MBCE 1.01
Popular comparisons
- 0.04% · 0.06%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 1.01% · 0.06%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.04% · 0.04%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 1.01% · 0.04%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.04% · 0.06%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 1.01% · 0.06%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.