ILCV ranks 2nd and QLC 25th of 99 funds in the US Multifactor Category.
ILCV vs QLC
ILCV −0.21pt a year
0.04%0.25%
QLC 1.8×the volume
24.4K43.3K
QLC +2.4pt
+12.3%+14.7%
ILCV vs QLC Performance
+81.1%+88.8%
- ILCV 0.04%, better
- QLC 0.25%
- ILCV $1.37B
- QLC $1.13B
- ILCV +21.0%, better
- QLC +13.0%
- ILCV 1.51%, better
- QLC 0.97%
- ILCV 375
- QLC 159
- ILCV 24.4K sh
- QLC 43.3K sh, better
- ILCV $109.27
- QLC $89.36
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | ILCV | QLC |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A99Higher | B63 |
| Mission | A82 | A94Higher |
| Risk | A90Higher | B62 |
| Tradability | B64 | B68Higher |
| Holdings | D39 | D39 |
| Durability | A82Higher | A70 |
Rank among US Multifactor funds
Same Category. ILCV and QLC are both graded against the same 99 US Multifactor funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
ILCVA
QLCB
In short
ILCV Value done the thorough way: roughly 400 large- and mid-cap US stocks screened on five separate value measures, not just cheap book value. Running since 2004 at four basis points, it's one of the cheapest tickets into the value factor.
QLC One optimizer, three factors. QLC chases quality, value and momentum together, then boxes its sector, industry and beta bets close to the large-cap universe. Running since 2015 on Northern Trust's in-house quality model.
Stated mandate
ILCV The fund seeks to track an index of U.S. large- and mid-cap stocks selected with value-oriented measures including forward earnings, book value, sales, cash flow, and dividend yield.
QLC The Fund seeks to track the price and yield performance of the Northern Trust Quality Large Cap Index before fees and expenses.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
ILCV vs QLC Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
ILCV vs QLC Cost
Overpaying QLC vs ILCV
$4,310
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
ILCV 0.04%
$849
QLC 0.25%
$5,159
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | ILCV | QLC | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $73 | $455 | $382 |
| 20 | $288 | $1,769 | $1,481 |
| 30 | $849 | $5,159 | $4,310 |
- 0.04%ILCV, cheaper
- 0.25%QLC
- Middle half of US Multifactor funds
- Median 0.29%
ILCV cheapest of 99 funds
QLC 36th cheapest of 99 funds
ILCV vs QLC Dividends
- ILCV 1.51%, better
- QLC 0.97%
- ILCV $1.65
- QLC $0.87
- ILCV $0.42
- QLC $0.22
- ILCV Sep 15, 2026
- QLC Sep 18, 2026
- ILCV Sep 18, 2026
- QLC Sep 24, 2026
- ILCV Quarterly
- QLC Quarterly
Distribution history
ILCV vs QLC Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
- ILCV
- QLC
Risk facts
- Volatility
- ILCV 10.7%, betterQLC 12.1%
- Return per unit of risk
- ILCV 1.57QLC 1.59, better
- Worst fall
- ILCV −18.6%, betterQLC −23.8%
- Market sensitivity
- ILCV 0.82QLC 0.99
Popular comparisons
- 0.04% · 0.06%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.25% · 0.06%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.04% · 0.04%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.25% · 0.04%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.04% · 0.06%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.25% · 0.06%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.