Skip to content

QLC vs VYM

Northern Trust US Quality Large Cap ETF

QLCBCboe

Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF

VYMANYSE Arca

Overlap

Expense ratio

VYM −0.21pt a year

QLC0.25%VYM0.04%

Avg volume · 30D

VYM 26.4×the volume

QLC43.3KVYM1.14M

10Y return · a year

QLC +2.7pt

QLC+14.7%VYM+12.0%

QLC vs VYM Performance

Oct 29, 2021 – Oct 30, 2026

+88.8%QLC+74.3%VYM

Oct 29, 2021 to Oct 30, 2026. QLC +88.8%. VYM +74.3%. Use the arrow keys to read each point.−25%0%25%50%Oct 2021Apr 2024Oct 2026
Expense ratio
QLC 0.25%
VYM 0.04%, better
Fund size
QLC $1.13B
VYM $95.8B
1Y total return
QLC +13.0%
VYM +19.3%, better
Yield (12M)
QLC 0.97%
VYM 2.24%, better
Holdings
QLC 159
VYM 601
Avg volume (30D)
QLC 43.3K sh
VYM 1.14M sh, better
NAV per share
QLC $89.36
VYM $163.75
52W range

ETF.net Grade

QLC: Cost 63, Risk 62, Mission 94, Tradability 68, Holdings 39, Durability 70. VYM: Cost 99, Risk 84, Mission 79, Tradability 61, Holdings 53, Durability 95.
Pillar letters and Scores for QLC, VYM, with each pillar’s weight
PillarQLCVYM
Cost30% weightB63A99Higher
Mission25% weightA94HigherA79
Risk15% weightB62A84Higher
Tradability15% weightB68HigherB61
Holdings10% weightD39C53Higher
Durability5% weightA70A95Higher

Rank among US Multifactor funds

Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Same Category. QLC and VYM are both graded against the same 99 US Multifactor funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

US Multifactor⁠

Category · 99 funds
See all 99 ›

VYM ranks 2nd and QLC 25th of 99 funds in the US Multifactor Category.

  1. Rank 1AVONVVanguard Russell 1000 Value ETFScore 85
  2. Rank 2AILCViShares Morningstar Value ETFScore 81
  3. Rank 2AVYMVanguard High Dividend Yield ETFScore 81
  4. Rank 4AIMCViShares Morningstar Mid-Cap Value ETFScore 80
  5. Rank 25BJPUSJPMorgan Diversified Return U.S. Equity ETFScore 69
  6. Rank 25BQLCNorthern Trust US Quality Large Cap ETFScore 69
  7. Rank 28BIUSInvesco RAFI Strategic US ETFScore 68

Our read on each fund

ETF.net Research

QLCBNorthern Trust US Quality Large Cap ETF

VYMAVanguard High Dividend Yield ETF

In short

QLC One optimizer, three factors. QLC chases quality, value and momentum together, then boxes its sector, industry and beta bets close to the large-cap universe. Running since 2015 on Northern Trust's in-house quality model.

VYM The no-frills dividend workhorse. VYM buys the higher-yielding end of the US market, roughly 600 names, for four basis points: no quality screen, no dividend-growth-streak test, just yield, at scale since 2006.

Stated mandate

QLC The Fund seeks to track the price and yield performance of the Northern Trust Quality Large Cap Index before fees and expenses.

VYM The Fund seeks to track a benchmark index measuring the investment return of common stocks from companies characterized by high dividend yields.

Why people hold it

  • QLC Quality has a definition here: a proprietary Northern Trust model scores profitability, management efficiency and cash flow, then an optimizer blends it with value and momentum.northerntrust.com
  • Guardrails are written into the index rules: sector and industry weights within 3 points of the eligible universe, beta within 5%, turnover capped. The tilt stays a tilt.northerntrust.com
  • 0.25% net of a waiver through March 1, 2027 (0.26% gross) sits near the category median, and the fund has hugged its index closely rather than drifting from it.
  • Live since 2015, a multi-billion-dollar fund paying quarterly, and one of the stronger builds in a crowded multifactor field.
  • VYM Four basis points a year, against a peer-group median near 0.32%. Cheaper than cohort neighbors VONV (0.06%) and FNDX (0.25%).
  • Running since 2006 and now a multi-billion-dollar fund that trades actively, so ordinary orders tend to fill at tight spreads.
  • Simple mandate: track the FTSE High Dividend Yield Index of US common stocks screened on yield. No manager discretion, no options overlay, plain 1940-Act fund.vanguard.com
  • Pays quarterly, and among 100-plus value and multifactor rivals it stands as one of the strongest overall packages in the group.

Worth knowing

  • QLC Plain-vanilla factor rivals cost far less: VYM at 0.04%, VONV at 0.06%, LRGF at 0.08%. The spread is what the quality model costs.
  • Not one of the heavily traded names in its category, so spreads can run wider than the giants'. Order type matters more here.
  • About 160 stocks is a slimmer roster than a broad large-cap index, so individual names and the optimizer's choices carry more weight.northerntrust.com
  • VYM The screen is yield, not payout growth or dividend quality, so a company can qualify simply because its share price fell.
  • This is a value slice by design, tilted to established payers, so it behaves differently from a total US market fund.
  • Roughly 600 holdings, but weight leans toward the largest payers, so the top of the roster does more of the work than the count suggests.

Full QLC profile⁠

Full VYM profile⁠

QLC vs VYM Holdings

How we measure overlap

Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.

QLC vs VYM Cost

Overpaying QLC vs VYM

$4,310

On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.

  • QLC 0.25%

    $5,159

  • VYM 0.04%

    $849

$10,000
30 years

Cost over time

  • QLC 0.25%
  • VYM 0.04%
  • Overpaying
One line per fund, from year 0 to year 30. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$2K$4K$6K051015202530QLC $5,159VYM $849

Year by year

YearQLCVYMOverpaying
10$455$73$382
20$1,769$288$1,481
30$5,159$849$4,310

Expense ratio

  • 0.25%QLC
  • 0.04%VYM, cheaper
  • Middle half of US Multifactor funds
  • Median 0.29%

VYM cheapest of 99 funds

QLC 36th cheapest of 99 funds

QLC vs VYM Dividends

Last 12 months to Oct 30, 2026
Yield (12M)
QLC 0.97%
VYM 2.24%, better
Payout (12M)
QLC $0.87
VYM $3.68
Last payment
QLC $0.22
VYM $0.89
Ex-dividend
QLC Sep 18, 2026
VYM Sep 18, 2026
Paid on
QLC Sep 24, 2026
VYM Sep 22, 2026
Frequency
QLC Quarterly
VYM Quarterly

Distribution history

Per share, 2017 to 2026, same scale for both

QLCQuarterly · 39 paymentsAll QLC payments⁠
One bar per payment. 39 payments from 2017 to 2026 YTD. Mar 20, 2017 $0.04; Jun 19, 2017 $0.13; Sep 18, 2017 $0.13; Dec 21, 2017 $0.14; Mar 19, 2018 $0.10; Jun 18, 2018 $0.13; Sep 24, 2018 $0.15; Dec 21, 2018 $0.17; Mar 15, 2019 $0.11; Jun 21, 2019 $0.28; Sep 20, 2019 $0.15; Dec 20, 2019 $0.16; Mar 20, 2020 $0.14; Jun 19, 2020 $0.14; Sep 18, 2020 $0.15; Dec 18, 2020 $0.15; Mar 19, 2021 $0.11; Jun 18, 2021 $0.13; Sep 17, 2021 $0.11; Dec 17, 2021 $0.16; Mar 18, 2022 $0.12; Jun 17, 2022 $0.14; Sep 16, 2022 $0.16; Dec 16, 2022 $0.20; Mar 17, 2023 $0.15; Jun 16, 2023 $0.17; Sep 15, 2023 $0.16; Dec 15, 2023 $0.20; Mar 15, 2024 $0.13; Jun 21, 2024 $0.17; Sep 20, 2024 $0.13; Dec 20, 2024 $0.25; Mar 21, 2025 $0.12; Jun 20, 2025 $0.17; Sep 19, 2025 $0.20; Dec 19, 2025 $0.28; Mar 20, 2026 $0.14; Jun 18, 2026 $0.22; Sep 18, 2026 $0.22. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$12017202020232026YTD
VYMQuarterly · 39 paymentsAll VYM payments⁠
One bar per payment. 39 payments from 2017 to 2026 YTD. Mar 22, 2017 $0.56; Jun 23, 2017 $0.60; Sep 20, 2017 $0.60; Dec 21, 2017 $0.64; Mar 26, 2018 $0.61; Jun 22, 2018 $0.63; Sep 26, 2018 $0.67; Dec 24, 2018 $0.74; Mar 25, 2019 $0.65; Jun 17, 2019 $0.62; Sep 24, 2019 $0.79; Dec 23, 2019 $0.78; Mar 10, 2020 $0.55; Jun 22, 2020 $0.84; Sep 21, 2020 $0.71; Dec 21, 2020 $0.81; Mar 22, 2021 $0.66; Jun 21, 2021 $0.75; Sep 20, 2021 $0.75; Dec 20, 2021 $0.94; Mar 21, 2022 $0.66; Jun 21, 2022 $0.85; Sep 19, 2022 $0.77; Dec 19, 2022 $0.97; Mar 20, 2023 $0.72; Jun 20, 2023 $0.88; Sep 18, 2023 $0.78; Dec 18, 2023 $1.10; Mar 15, 2024 $0.66; Jun 21, 2024 $1.02; Sep 20, 2024 $0.85; Dec 20, 2024 $0.96; Mar 21, 2025 $0.85; Jun 20, 2025 $0.86; Sep 19, 2025 $0.84; Dec 19, 2025 $0.95; Mar 20, 2026 $0.86; Jun 18, 2026 $0.98; Sep 18, 2026 $0.89. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$12017202020232026YTD

QLC vs VYM Risk

Fall from peak · 5 years

  • QLC
  • VYM
Oct 29, 2021 to Oct 30, 2026. Worst fall: QLC −23.8% · Sep 2022. Use the arrow keys to read each point.−25%−20%−15%−10%−5%0%Oct 2021Apr 2024Oct 2026

Risk facts

VolatilityStd dev, 3 years
QLC 12.1%VYM 11.1%, better
Return per unit of riskSharpe ratio, 3 years
QLC 1.59, betterVYM 1.38
Worst fallMax drawdown, 5 years
QLC −23.8%VYM −15.9%, better
Market sensitivityBeta, 5 years
QLC 0.99VYM 0.75

QLC and VYM in the news

Popular comparisons

  • QLCBvsVONVA

    Northern Trust US Quality Large Cap ETF · Vanguard Russell 1000 Value ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.25% · 0.06%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • VYMAvsVONVA

    Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF · Vanguard Russell 1000 Value ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.04% · 0.06%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • QLCBvsILCVA

    Northern Trust US Quality Large Cap ETF · iShares Morningstar Value ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.25% · 0.04%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • VYMAvsILCVA

    Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF · iShares Morningstar Value ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.04% · 0.04%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • QLCBvsIMCVA

    Northern Trust US Quality Large Cap ETF · iShares Morningstar Mid-Cap Value ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.25% · 0.06%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • VYMAvsIMCVA

    Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF · iShares Morningstar Mid-Cap Value ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.04% · 0.06%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.