VYM ranks 2nd and QLC 25th of 99 funds in the US Multifactor Category.
QLC vs VYM
VYM −0.21pt a year
0.25%0.04%
VYM 26.4×the volume
43.3K1.14M
QLC +2.7pt
+14.7%+12.0%
QLC vs VYM Performance
+88.8%+74.3%
- QLC 0.25%
- VYM 0.04%, better
- QLC $1.13B
- VYM $95.8B
- QLC +13.0%
- VYM +19.3%, better
- QLC 0.97%
- VYM 2.24%, better
- QLC 159
- VYM 601
- QLC 43.3K sh
- VYM 1.14M sh, better
- QLC $89.36
- VYM $163.75
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | QLC | VYM |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | B63 | A99Higher |
| Mission | A94Higher | A79 |
| Risk | B62 | A84Higher |
| Tradability | B68Higher | B61 |
| Holdings | D39 | C53Higher |
| Durability | A70 | A95Higher |
Rank among US Multifactor funds
Same Category. QLC and VYM are both graded against the same 99 US Multifactor funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
QLCB
VYMA
In short
QLC One optimizer, three factors. QLC chases quality, value and momentum together, then boxes its sector, industry and beta bets close to the large-cap universe. Running since 2015 on Northern Trust's in-house quality model.
VYM The no-frills dividend workhorse. VYM buys the higher-yielding end of the US market, roughly 600 names, for four basis points: no quality screen, no dividend-growth-streak test, just yield, at scale since 2006.
Stated mandate
QLC The Fund seeks to track the price and yield performance of the Northern Trust Quality Large Cap Index before fees and expenses.
VYM The Fund seeks to track a benchmark index measuring the investment return of common stocks from companies characterized by high dividend yields.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
QLC vs VYM Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
QLC vs VYM Cost
Overpaying QLC vs VYM
$4,310
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
QLC 0.25%
$5,159
VYM 0.04%
$849
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | QLC | VYM | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $455 | $73 | $382 |
| 20 | $1,769 | $288 | $1,481 |
| 30 | $5,159 | $849 | $4,310 |
- 0.25%QLC
- 0.04%VYM, cheaper
- Middle half of US Multifactor funds
- Median 0.29%
VYM cheapest of 99 funds
QLC 36th cheapest of 99 funds
QLC vs VYM Dividends
- QLC 0.97%
- VYM 2.24%, better
- QLC $0.87
- VYM $3.68
- QLC $0.22
- VYM $0.89
- QLC Sep 18, 2026
- VYM Sep 18, 2026
- QLC Sep 24, 2026
- VYM Sep 22, 2026
- QLC Quarterly
- VYM Quarterly
Distribution history
QLC vs VYM Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
- QLC
- VYM
Risk facts
- Volatility
- QLC 12.1%VYM 11.1%, better
- Return per unit of risk
- QLC 1.59, betterVYM 1.38
- Worst fall
- QLC −23.8%VYM −15.9%, better
- Market sensitivity
- QLC 0.99VYM 0.75
QLC and VYM in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.25% · 0.06%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.04% · 0.06%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.25% · 0.04%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.04% · 0.04%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.25% · 0.06%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.04% · 0.06%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.



