ILCV ranks 2nd and QUS 5th of 99 funds in the US Multifactor Category.
ILCV vs QUS
ILCV −0.11pt a year
0.04%0.15%
ILCV 1.4×the volume
24.4K17.9K
QUS +1.8pt
+12.3%+14.1%
ILCV vs QUS Performance
+81.1%+67.7%
- ILCV 0.04%, better
- QUS 0.15%
- ILCV $1.37B
- QUS $1.6B
- ILCV +21.0%, better
- QUS +15.7%
- ILCV 1.51%, better
- QUS 1.24%
- ILCV 375
- QUS 516
- ILCV 24.4K sh, better
- QUS 17.9K sh
- ILCV $109.27
- QUS $197.42
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | ILCV | QUS |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A99Higher | A83 |
| Mission | A82 | A87Higher |
| Risk | A90Higher | A83 |
| Tradability | B64 | B67Higher |
| Holdings | D39 | B61Higher |
| Durability | A82Higher | A80 |
Rank among US Multifactor funds
Same Category. ILCV and QUS are both graded against the same 99 US Multifactor funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
ILCVA
QUSA
In short
ILCV Value done the thorough way: roughly 400 large- and mid-cap US stocks screened on five separate value measures, not just cheap book value. Running since 2004 at four basis points, it's one of the cheapest tickets into the value factor.
QUS Most factor ETFs pick one lane. QUS runs three at once: quality, value and low volatility blended into a single broad US portfolio, at 0.15% a year, well under what the typical multifactor fund charges.
Stated mandate
ILCV The fund seeks to track an index of U.S. large- and mid-cap stocks selected with value-oriented measures including forward earnings, book value, sales, cash flow, and dividend yield.
QUS The fund seeks to track the MSCI USA Factor Mix A-Series Capped Index before fees and expenses. Its strategy combines low-volatility, quality, and value exposures in one smart-beta portfolio.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
ILCV vs QUS Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
ILCV vs QUS Cost
Overpaying QUS vs ILCV
$2,288
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
ILCV 0.04%
$849
QUS 0.15%
$3,137
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | ILCV | QUS | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $73 | $274 | $201 |
| 20 | $288 | $1,071 | $783 |
| 30 | $849 | $3,137 | $2,288 |
- 0.04%ILCV, cheaper
- 0.15%QUS
- Middle half of US Multifactor funds
- Median 0.29%
ILCV cheapest of 99 funds
QUS 13th cheapest of 99 funds
ILCV vs QUS Dividends
- ILCV 1.51%, better
- QUS 1.24%
- ILCV $1.65
- QUS $2.43
- ILCV $0.42
- QUS $1.01
- ILCV Sep 15, 2026
- QUS Jun 1, 2026
- ILCV Sep 18, 2026
- QUS Jun 5, 2026
- ILCV Quarterly
- QUS Twice a year
Distribution history
ILCV vs QUS Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
- ILCV
- QUS
Risk facts
- Volatility
- ILCV 10.7%QUS 10.1%, better
- Return per unit of risk
- ILCV 1.57, betterQUS 1.45
- Worst fall
- ILCV −18.6%, betterQUS −22.3%
- Market sensitivity
- ILCV 0.82QUS 0.73
ILCV and QUS in the news
Category Review
US multifactor funds ran 30 points apart

Popular comparisons
- 0.04% · 0.06%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.15% · 0.06%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.04% · 0.04%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.15% · 0.04%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.04% · 0.06%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.15% · 0.06%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.