VYM ranks 2nd and QUS 5th of 99 funds in the US Multifactor Category.
QUS vs VYM
VYM −0.11pt a year
0.15%0.04%
VYM 63.7×the volume
17.9K1.14M
QUS +2.1pt
+14.1%+12.0%
QUS vs VYM Performance
+67.7%+74.3%
- QUS 0.15%
- VYM 0.04%, better
- QUS $1.6B
- VYM $95.8B
- QUS +15.7%
- VYM +19.3%, better
- QUS 1.24%
- VYM 2.24%, better
- QUS 516
- VYM 601
- QUS 17.9K sh
- VYM 1.14M sh, better
- QUS $197.42
- VYM $163.75
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | QUS | VYM |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A83 | A99Higher |
| Mission | A87Higher | A79 |
| Risk | A83 | A84Higher |
| Tradability | B67Higher | B61 |
| Holdings | B61Higher | C53 |
| Durability | A80 | A95Higher |
Rank among US Multifactor funds
Same Category. QUS and VYM are both graded against the same 99 US Multifactor funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
QUSA
VYMA
In short
QUS Most factor ETFs pick one lane. QUS runs three at once: quality, value and low volatility blended into a single broad US portfolio, at 0.15% a year, well under what the typical multifactor fund charges.
VYM The no-frills dividend workhorse. VYM buys the higher-yielding end of the US market, roughly 600 names, for four basis points: no quality screen, no dividend-growth-streak test, just yield, at scale since 2006.
Stated mandate
QUS The fund seeks to track the MSCI USA Factor Mix A-Series Capped Index before fees and expenses. Its strategy combines low-volatility, quality, and value exposures in one smart-beta portfolio.
VYM The Fund seeks to track a benchmark index measuring the investment return of common stocks from companies characterized by high dividend yields.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
QUS vs VYM Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
QUS vs VYM Cost
Overpaying QUS vs VYM
$2,288
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
QUS 0.15%
$3,137
VYM 0.04%
$849
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | QUS | VYM | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $274 | $73 | $201 |
| 20 | $1,071 | $288 | $783 |
| 30 | $3,137 | $849 | $2,288 |
- 0.15%QUS
- 0.04%VYM, cheaper
- Middle half of US Multifactor funds
- Median 0.29%
VYM cheapest of 99 funds
QUS 13th cheapest of 99 funds
QUS vs VYM Dividends
- QUS 1.24%
- VYM 2.24%, better
- QUS $2.43
- VYM $3.68
- QUS $1.01
- VYM $0.89
- QUS Jun 1, 2026
- VYM Sep 18, 2026
- QUS Jun 5, 2026
- VYM Sep 22, 2026
- QUS Twice a year
- VYM Quarterly
Distribution history
QUS vs VYM Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
- QUS
- VYM
Risk facts
- Volatility
- QUS 10.1%, betterVYM 11.1%
- Return per unit of risk
- QUS 1.45, betterVYM 1.38
- Worst fall
- QUS −22.3%VYM −15.9%, better
- Market sensitivity
- QUS 0.73VYM 0.75
QUS and VYM in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.15% · 0.06%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.04% · 0.06%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.15% · 0.04%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.04% · 0.04%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.15% · 0.06%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.04% · 0.06%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.



