Skip to content

QUS vs VYM

State Street SPDR MSCI USA StrategicFactors ETF

QUSANYSE Arca

Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF

VYMANYSE Arca

Overlap

Expense ratio

VYM −0.11pt a year

QUS0.15%VYM0.04%

Avg volume · 30D

VYM 63.7×the volume

QUS17.9KVYM1.14M

10Y return · a year

QUS +2.1pt

QUS+14.1%VYM+12.0%

QUS vs VYM Performance

Oct 29, 2021 – Oct 30, 2026

+67.7%QUS+74.3%VYM

Oct 29, 2021 to Oct 30, 2026. QUS +67.7%. VYM +74.3%. Use the arrow keys to read each point.−20%0%20%40%Oct 2021Apr 2024Oct 2026
Expense ratio
QUS 0.15%
VYM 0.04%, better
Fund size
QUS $1.6B
VYM $95.8B
1Y total return
QUS +15.7%
VYM +19.3%, better
Yield (12M)
QUS 1.24%
VYM 2.24%, better
Holdings
QUS 516
VYM 601
Avg volume (30D)
QUS 17.9K sh
VYM 1.14M sh, better
NAV per share
QUS $197.42
VYM $163.75
52W range

ETF.net Grade

QUS: Cost 83, Risk 83, Mission 87, Tradability 67, Holdings 61, Durability 80. VYM: Cost 99, Risk 84, Mission 79, Tradability 61, Holdings 53, Durability 95.
Pillar letters and Scores for QUS, VYM, with each pillar’s weight
PillarQUSVYM
Cost30% weightA83A99Higher
Mission25% weightA87HigherA79
Risk15% weightA83A84Higher
Tradability15% weightB67HigherB61
Holdings10% weightB61HigherC53
Durability5% weightA80A95Higher

Rank among US Multifactor funds

Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Same Category. QUS and VYM are both graded against the same 99 US Multifactor funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

US Multifactor⁠

Category · 99 funds
See all 99 ›

VYM ranks 2nd and QUS 5th of 99 funds in the US Multifactor Category.

  1. Rank 1AVONVVanguard Russell 1000 Value ETFScore 85
  2. Rank 2AILCViShares Morningstar Value ETFScore 81
  3. Rank 2AVYMVanguard High Dividend Yield ETFScore 81
  4. Rank 4AIMCViShares Morningstar Mid-Cap Value ETFScore 80
  5. Rank 5ALRGFiShares U.S. Equity Factor ETFScore 79
  6. Rank 5AQUSState Street SPDR MSCI USA StrategicFactors ETFScore 79
  7. Rank 9AFNDXSchwab Fundamental U.S. Large Company ETFScore 78

Our read on each fund

ETF.net Research

QUSAState Street SPDR MSCI USA StrategicFactors ETF

VYMAVanguard High Dividend Yield ETF

In short

QUS Most factor ETFs pick one lane. QUS runs three at once: quality, value and low volatility blended into a single broad US portfolio, at 0.15% a year, well under what the typical multifactor fund charges.

VYM The no-frills dividend workhorse. VYM buys the higher-yielding end of the US market, roughly 600 names, for four basis points: no quality screen, no dividend-growth-streak test, just yield, at scale since 2006.

Stated mandate

QUS The fund seeks to track the MSCI USA Factor Mix A-Series Capped Index before fees and expenses. Its strategy combines low-volatility, quality, and value exposures in one smart-beta portfolio.

VYM The Fund seeks to track a benchmark index measuring the investment return of common stocks from companies characterized by high dividend yields.

Why people hold it

  • QUS Three factors, one ticket. The index combines quality, value and low-volatility exposure, so a diversified tilt does not mean stacking three separate funds.ssga.com
  • At 0.15%, the fee is less than half the median in its multifactor cohort and undercuts Schwab's FNDX at 0.25%.
  • Roughly 500 US names keeps this broad rather than a narrow bet, and the fund has tracked its MSCI index closely since launching in 2015.
  • A multi-billion-dollar State Street fund, and one of the stronger multifactor implementations in its peer group.
  • VYM Four basis points a year, against a peer-group median near 0.32%. Cheaper than cohort neighbors VONV (0.06%) and FNDX (0.25%).
  • Running since 2006 and now a multi-billion-dollar fund that trades actively, so ordinary orders tend to fill at tight spreads.
  • Simple mandate: track the FTSE High Dividend Yield Index of US common stocks screened on yield. No manager discretion, no options overlay, plain 1940-Act fund.vanguard.com
  • Pays quarterly, and among 100-plus value and multifactor rivals it stands as one of the strongest overall packages in the group.

Worth knowing

  • QUS It is thinly traded next to the category's giants, so bid-ask spreads can run wider than on plain index heavyweights.
  • Blending three factors mutes each one. By design this tracks neither a pure value fund like VONV nor a pure low-volatility sleeve.
  • Distributions land once or twice a year, not quarterly, so this is not shaped like an income fund such as VYM.
  • VYM The screen is yield, not payout growth or dividend quality, so a company can qualify simply because its share price fell.
  • This is a value slice by design, tilted to established payers, so it behaves differently from a total US market fund.
  • Roughly 600 holdings, but weight leans toward the largest payers, so the top of the roster does more of the work than the count suggests.

Full QUS profile⁠

Full VYM profile⁠

QUS vs VYM Holdings

How we measure overlap

Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.

QUS vs VYM Cost

Overpaying QUS vs VYM

$2,288

On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.

  • QUS 0.15%

    $3,137

  • VYM 0.04%

    $849

$10,000
30 years

Cost over time

  • QUS 0.15%
  • VYM 0.04%
  • Overpaying
One line per fund, from year 0 to year 30. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$1K$2K$3K$4K051015202530QUS $3,137VYM $849

Year by year

YearQUSVYMOverpaying
10$274$73$201
20$1,071$288$783
30$3,137$849$2,288

Expense ratio

  • 0.15%QUS
  • 0.04%VYM, cheaper
  • Middle half of US Multifactor funds
  • Median 0.29%

VYM cheapest of 99 funds

QUS 13th cheapest of 99 funds

QUS vs VYM Dividends

Last 12 months to Oct 30, 2026
Yield (12M)
QUS 1.24%
VYM 2.24%, better
Payout (12M)
QUS $2.43
VYM $3.68
Last payment
QUS $1.01
VYM $0.89
Ex-dividend
QUS Jun 1, 2026
VYM Sep 18, 2026
Paid on
QUS Jun 5, 2026
VYM Sep 22, 2026
Frequency
QUS Twice a year
VYM Quarterly

Distribution history

Per share, 2017 to 2026, same scale for both

QUSTwice a year · 24 paymentsAll QUS payments⁠
One bar per payment. 24 payments from 2017 to 2026 YTD. Mar 17, 2017 $0.30; Jun 16, 2017 $0.37; Sep 15, 2017 $0.34; Dec 15, 2017 $0.43; Mar 16, 2018 $0.33; Jun 1, 2018 $0.30; Dec 21, 2018 $0.92; Jun 3, 2019 $0.72; Dec 20, 2019 $1.00; Jun 1, 2020 $0.77; Dec 18, 2020 $1.03; Jun 1, 2021 $0.74; Dec 17, 2021 $0.92; Jun 1, 2022 $0.76; Dec 16, 2022 $1.09; Jun 1, 2023 $0.86; Dec 15, 2023 $1.21; Apr 1, 2024 $0.11; May 1, 2024 $0.12; Jun 3, 2024 $0.97; Dec 18, 2024 $1.34; Jun 2, 2025 $0.99; Nov 25, 2025 $1.42; Jun 1, 2026 $1.01. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$12017202020232026YTD
VYMQuarterly · 39 paymentsAll VYM payments⁠
One bar per payment. 39 payments from 2017 to 2026 YTD. Mar 22, 2017 $0.56; Jun 23, 2017 $0.60; Sep 20, 2017 $0.60; Dec 21, 2017 $0.64; Mar 26, 2018 $0.61; Jun 22, 2018 $0.63; Sep 26, 2018 $0.67; Dec 24, 2018 $0.74; Mar 25, 2019 $0.65; Jun 17, 2019 $0.62; Sep 24, 2019 $0.79; Dec 23, 2019 $0.78; Mar 10, 2020 $0.55; Jun 22, 2020 $0.84; Sep 21, 2020 $0.71; Dec 21, 2020 $0.81; Mar 22, 2021 $0.66; Jun 21, 2021 $0.75; Sep 20, 2021 $0.75; Dec 20, 2021 $0.94; Mar 21, 2022 $0.66; Jun 21, 2022 $0.85; Sep 19, 2022 $0.77; Dec 19, 2022 $0.97; Mar 20, 2023 $0.72; Jun 20, 2023 $0.88; Sep 18, 2023 $0.78; Dec 18, 2023 $1.10; Mar 15, 2024 $0.66; Jun 21, 2024 $1.02; Sep 20, 2024 $0.85; Dec 20, 2024 $0.96; Mar 21, 2025 $0.85; Jun 20, 2025 $0.86; Sep 19, 2025 $0.84; Dec 19, 2025 $0.95; Mar 20, 2026 $0.86; Jun 18, 2026 $0.98; Sep 18, 2026 $0.89. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$12017202020232026YTD

QUS vs VYM Risk

Fall from peak · 5 years

  • QUS
  • VYM
Oct 29, 2021 to Oct 30, 2026. Worst fall: QUS −22.3% · Oct 2022. Use the arrow keys to read each point.−20%−15%−10%−5%0%Oct 2021Apr 2024Oct 2026

Risk facts

VolatilityStd dev, 3 years
QUS 10.1%, betterVYM 11.1%
Return per unit of riskSharpe ratio, 3 years
QUS 1.45, betterVYM 1.38
Worst fallMax drawdown, 5 years
QUS −22.3%VYM −15.9%, better
Market sensitivityBeta, 5 years
QUS 0.73VYM 0.75

QUS and VYM in the news

Popular comparisons

  • QUSAvsVONVA

    State Street SPDR MSCI USA StrategicFactors ETF · Vanguard Russell 1000 Value ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.15% · 0.06%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • VYMAvsVONVA

    Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF · Vanguard Russell 1000 Value ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.04% · 0.06%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • QUSAvsILCVA

    State Street SPDR MSCI USA StrategicFactors ETF · iShares Morningstar Value ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.15% · 0.04%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • VYMAvsILCVA

    Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF · iShares Morningstar Value ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.04% · 0.04%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • QUSAvsIMCVA

    State Street SPDR MSCI USA StrategicFactors ETF · iShares Morningstar Mid-Cap Value ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.15% · 0.06%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • VYMAvsIMCVA

    Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF · iShares Morningstar Mid-Cap Value ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.04% · 0.06%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.