ILCV ranks 2nd and ROSC 66th of 99 funds in the US Multifactor Category.
ILCV vs ROSC
ILCV −0.30pt a year
0.04%0.34%
ILCV 5.7×the volume
24.4K4.27K
ILCV +1.5pt
+12.3%+10.8%
ILCV vs ROSC Performance
+81.1%+56.6%
- ILCV 0.04%, better
- ROSC 0.34%
- ILCV $1.37B
- ROSC $48M
- ILCV +21.0%
- ROSC +27.2%, better
- ILCV 1.51%
- ROSC 1.92%, better
- ILCV 375
- ROSC 316
- ILCV 24.4K sh, better
- ROSC 4.27K sh
- ILCV $109.27
- ROSC $55.37
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | ILCV | ROSC |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A99Higher | C46 |
| Mission | A82Higher | B62 |
| Risk | A90Higher | C45 |
| Tradability | B64Higher | D26 |
| Holdings | D39 | A75Higher |
| Durability | A82Higher | D33 |
Rank among US Multifactor funds
Same Category. ILCV and ROSC are both graded against the same 99 US Multifactor funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
ILCVA
ROSCC
In short
ILCV Value done the thorough way: roughly 400 large- and mid-cap US stocks screened on five separate value measures, not just cheap book value. Running since 2004 at four basis points, it's one of the cheapest tickets into the value factor.
ROSC Small caps with the risk dials turned down. ROSC's index leans toward cheaper, more profitable small companies and caps concentration, targeting up to 15% less volatility than the cap-weighted small-cap universe over a full market cycle.
Stated mandate
ILCV The fund seeks to track an index of U.S. large- and mid-cap stocks selected with value-oriented measures including forward earnings, book value, sales, cash flow, and dividend yield.
ROSC The Fund seeks U.S. small-cap core equity exposure through a rules-based index whose constituents are selected and weighted using a multifactor methodology. The index targets up to a 15% reduction in volatility over a complete market cycle.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
ILCV vs ROSC Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
ILCV vs ROSC Cost
Overpaying ROSC vs ILCV
$6,083
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
ILCV 0.04%
$849
ROSC 0.34%
$6,932
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | ILCV | ROSC | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $73 | $616 | $543 |
| 20 | $288 | $2,386 | $2,098 |
| 30 | $849 | $6,932 | $6,083 |
- 0.04%ILCV, cheaper
- 0.34%ROSC
- Middle half of US Multifactor funds
- Median 0.29%
ILCV cheapest of 99 funds
ROSC 53rd cheapest of 99 funds
ILCV vs ROSC Dividends
- ILCV 1.51%
- ROSC 1.92%, better
- ILCV $1.65
- ROSC $1.06
- ILCV $0.42
- ROSC $0.28
- ILCV Sep 15, 2026
- ROSC Sep 25, 2026
- ILCV Sep 18, 2026
- ROSC Sep 29, 2026
- ILCV Quarterly
- ROSC Quarterly
Distribution history
ILCV vs ROSC Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
- ILCV
- ROSC
Risk facts
- Volatility
- ILCV 10.7%, betterROSC 17.3%
- Return per unit of risk
- ILCV 1.57, betterROSC 0.85
- Worst fall
- ILCV −18.6%, betterROSC −23.7%
- Market sensitivity
- ILCV 0.82ROSC 0.91
Popular comparisons
- 0.04% · 0.06%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.34% · 0.06%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.04% · 0.04%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.34% · 0.04%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.04% · 0.06%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.34% · 0.06%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.