VONV ranks 1st and ROSC 66th of 99 funds in the US Multifactor Category.
ROSC vs VONV
VONV −0.28pt a year
0.34%0.06%
VONV 181.2×the volume
4.27K774K
VONV +1.2pt
+10.8%+12.0%
ROSC vs VONV Performance
+56.6%+73.8%
- ROSC 0.34%
- VONV 0.06%, better
- ROSC $48M
- VONV $23.3B
- ROSC +27.2%
- VONV +28.5%, better
- ROSC 1.92%, better
- VONV 1.53%
- ROSC 316
- VONV 873
- ROSC 4.27K sh
- VONV 774K sh, better
- ROSC $55.37
- VONV $113.44
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | ROSC | VONV |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | C46 | A96Higher |
| Mission | B62 | A100Higher |
| Risk | C45 | A86Higher |
| Tradability | D26 | B60Higher |
| Holdings | A75Higher | C49 |
| Durability | D33 | A93Higher |
Rank among US Multifactor funds
Same Category. ROSC and VONV are both graded against the same 99 US Multifactor funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
ROSCC
VONVA
In short
ROSC Small caps with the risk dials turned down. ROSC's index leans toward cheaper, more profitable small companies and caps concentration, targeting up to 15% less volatility than the cap-weighted small-cap universe over a full market cycle.
VONV The plain-vanilla value trade, done cheap: about 900 large US value stocks, full replication of the Russell 1000 Value Index, 0.06% a year. No factor cocktail, no premium price tag, and one of the strongest implementations in its factor peer group.
Stated mandate
ROSC The Fund seeks U.S. small-cap core equity exposure through a rules-based index whose constituents are selected and weighted using a multifactor methodology. The index targets up to a 15% reduction in volatility over a complete market cycle.
VONV The fund seeks to track the Russell 1000 Value Index, representing large-capitalization value stocks in the United States. It uses passive indexing and full replication to remain closely aligned with that benchmark.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
ROSC vs VONV Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
ROSC vs VONV Cost
Overpaying ROSC vs VONV
$5,662
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
ROSC 0.34%
$6,932
VONV 0.06%
$1,270
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | ROSC | VONV | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $616 | $110 | $506 |
| 20 | $2,386 | $432 | $1,954 |
| 30 | $6,932 | $1,270 | $5,662 |
- 0.34%ROSC
- 0.06%VONV, cheaper
- Middle half of US Multifactor funds
- Median 0.29%
VONV 4th cheapest of 99 funds
ROSC 53rd cheapest of 99 funds
ROSC vs VONV Dividends
- ROSC 1.92%, better
- VONV 1.53%
- ROSC $1.06
- VONV $1.74
- ROSC $0.28
- VONV $0.42
- ROSC Sep 25, 2026
- VONV Sep 23, 2026
- ROSC Sep 29, 2026
- VONV Sep 25, 2026
- ROSC Quarterly
- VONV Quarterly
Distribution history
ROSC vs VONV Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
- ROSC
- VONV
Risk facts
- Volatility
- ROSC 17.3%VONV 12.1%, better
- Return per unit of risk
- ROSC 0.85VONV 1.43, better
- Worst fall
- ROSC −23.7%VONV −18.9%, better
- Market sensitivity
- ROSC 0.91VONV 0.85
ROSC and VONV in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.34% · 0.04%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.06% · 0.04%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.34% · 0.04%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.06% · 0.04%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.34% · 0.06%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.06% · 0.06%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

