ILCV ranks 2nd and ROUS 27th of 99 funds in the US Multifactor Category.
ILCV vs ROUS
ILCV −0.15pt a year
0.04%0.19%
ROUS 2.6×the volume
25.1K64.1K
ROUS +1.0pt
+12.2%+13.2%
ILCV vs ROUS Performance
+79.9%+72.0%
- ILCV 0.04%, better
- ROUS 0.19%
- ILCV $1.37B
- ROUS $760M
- ILCV +22.4%, better
- ROUS +19.6%
- ILCV 1.50%, better
- ROUS 1.31%
- ILCV 374
- ROUS 329
- ILCV 25.1K sh
- ROUS 64.1K sh, better
- ILCV $108.28
- ROUS $66.11
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | ILCV | ROUS |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A99Higher | A71 |
| Mission | A82Higher | B69 |
| Risk | A91Higher | A81 |
| Tradability | B62Higher | B55 |
| Holdings | D39 | A76Higher |
| Durability | A82Higher | B56 |
Rank among US Multifactor funds
Same Category. ILCV and ROUS are both graded against the same 99 US Multifactor funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
ILCVA
ROUSB
In short
ILCV Value done the thorough way: roughly 400 large- and mid-cap US stocks screened on five separate value measures, not just cheap book value. Running since 2004 at four basis points, it's one of the cheapest tickets into the value factor.
ROUS Most multifactor funds stack factors and hope. ROUS follows an index that blends value, quality, momentum and low volatility while explicitly aiming to run up to 15% less volatile than the market over a full cycle.
Stated mandate
ILCV The fund seeks to track an index of U.S. large- and mid-cap stocks selected with value-oriented measures including forward earnings, book value, sales, cash flow, and dividend yield.
ROUS The fund seeks to track, before fees and expenses, the total return of the Hartford Multifactor Large Cap Index. The index uses multifactor selection and risk controls to seek enhanced return potential while reducing volatility by up to 15% over a complete market cycle.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
ILCV vs ROUS Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
ILCV vs ROUS Cost
Overpaying ROUS vs ILCV
$3,103
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
ILCV 0.04%
$849
ROUS 0.19%
$3,952
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | ILCV | ROUS | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $73 | $347 | $274 |
| 20 | $288 | $1,351 | $1,063 |
| 30 | $849 | $3,952 | $3,103 |
- 0.04%ILCV, cheaper
- 0.19%ROUS
- Middle half of US Multifactor funds
- Median 0.29%
ILCV cheapest of 99 funds
ROUS 26th cheapest of 99 funds
ILCV vs ROUS Dividends
- ILCV 1.50%, better
- ROUS 1.31%
- ILCV $1.65
- ROUS $0.88
- ILCV $0.42
- ROUS $0.19
- ILCV Sep 15, 2026
- ROUS Sep 25, 2026
- ILCV Sep 18, 2026
- ROUS Sep 29, 2026
- ILCV Quarterly
- ROUS Quarterly
Distribution history
ILCV vs ROUS Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
- ILCV
- ROUS
Risk facts
- Volatility
- ILCV 10.7%, betterROUS 11.0%
- Return per unit of risk
- ILCV 1.57, betterROUS 1.47
- Worst fall
- ILCV −18.6%, betterROUS −18.9%
- Market sensitivity
- ILCV 0.82ROUS 0.83
Popular comparisons
- 0.04% · 0.06%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.19% · 0.06%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.04% · 0.04%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.19% · 0.04%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.04% · 0.14%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.19% · 0.14%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.