VONV ranks 1st and ROUS 27th of 99 funds in the US Multifactor Category.
ROUS vs VONV
VONV −0.13pt a year
0.19%0.06%
VONV 12.1×the volume
64.1K776K
ROUS +1.3pt
+13.2%+11.9%
ROUS vs VONV Performance
+72.0%+73.9%
- ROUS 0.19%
- VONV 0.06%, better
- ROUS $760M
- VONV $21.7B
- ROUS +19.6%
- VONV +30.6%, better
- ROUS 1.31%
- VONV 1.51%, better
- ROUS 329
- VONV 887
- ROUS 64.1K sh
- VONV 776K sh, better
- ROUS $66.11
- VONV $112.88
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | ROUS | VONV |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A71 | A96Higher |
| Mission | B69 | A100Higher |
| Risk | A81 | A89Higher |
| Tradability | B55 | B59Higher |
| Holdings | A76Higher | C49 |
| Durability | B56 | A92Higher |
Rank among US Multifactor funds
Same Category. ROUS and VONV are both graded against the same 99 US Multifactor funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
ROUSB
VONVA
In short
ROUS Most multifactor funds stack factors and hope. ROUS follows an index that blends value, quality, momentum and low volatility while explicitly aiming to run up to 15% less volatile than the market over a full cycle.
VONV The plain-vanilla value trade, done cheap: about 900 large US value stocks, full replication of the Russell 1000 Value Index, 0.06% a year. No factor cocktail, no premium price tag, and one of the strongest implementations in its factor peer group.
Stated mandate
ROUS The fund seeks to track, before fees and expenses, the total return of the Hartford Multifactor Large Cap Index. The index uses multifactor selection and risk controls to seek enhanced return potential while reducing volatility by up to 15% over a complete market cycle.
VONV The fund seeks to track the Russell 1000 Value Index, representing large-capitalization value stocks in the United States. It uses passive indexing and full replication to remain closely aligned with that benchmark.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
ROUS vs VONV Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
ROUS vs VONV Cost
Overpaying ROUS vs VONV
$2,682
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
ROUS 0.19%
$3,952
VONV 0.06%
$1,270
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | ROUS | VONV | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $347 | $110 | $237 |
| 20 | $1,351 | $432 | $919 |
| 30 | $3,952 | $1,270 | $2,682 |
- 0.19%ROUS
- 0.06%VONV, cheaper
- Middle half of US Multifactor funds
- Median 0.29%
VONV 4th cheapest of 99 funds
ROUS 26th cheapest of 99 funds
ROUS vs VONV Dividends
- ROUS 1.31%
- VONV 1.51%, better
- ROUS $0.88
- VONV $1.74
- ROUS $0.19
- VONV $0.42
- ROUS Sep 25, 2026
- VONV Sep 23, 2026
- ROUS Sep 29, 2026
- VONV Sep 25, 2026
- ROUS Quarterly
- VONV Quarterly
Distribution history
ROUS vs VONV Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
- ROUS
- VONV
Risk facts
- Volatility
- ROUS 11.0%, betterVONV 12.1%
- Return per unit of risk
- ROUS 1.47, betterVONV 1.43
- Worst fall
- ROUS −18.9%VONV −18.9%Same figure. Both funds show the same value, so neither comes out ahead.
- Market sensitivity
- ROUS 0.83VONV 0.85
ROUS and VONV in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.19% · 0.04%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.06% · 0.04%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.19% · 0.04%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.06% · 0.04%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.19% · 0.14%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.06% · 0.14%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

