ILCV ranks 2nd and SMLF 12th of 99 funds in the US Multifactor Category.
ILCV vs SMLF
ILCV −0.11pt a year
0.04%0.15%
SMLF 7.3×the volume
24.4K179K
ILCV +0.3pt
+12.3%+12.0%
ILCV vs SMLF Performance
+81.1%+61.1%
- ILCV 0.04%, better
- SMLF 0.15%
- ILCV $1.37B
- SMLF $4.21B
- ILCV +21.0%, better
- SMLF +16.2%
- ILCV 1.51%, better
- SMLF 0.99%
- ILCV 375
- SMLF 936
- ILCV 24.4K sh
- SMLF 179K sh, better
- ILCV $109.27
- SMLF $85.25
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | ILCV | SMLF |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A99Higher | A83 |
| Mission | A82 | A92Higher |
| Risk | A90Higher | D35 |
| Tradability | B64 | A71Higher |
| Holdings | D39 | A84Higher |
| Durability | A82 | A88Higher |
Rank among US Multifactor funds
Same Category. ILCV and SMLF are both graded against the same 99 US Multifactor funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
ILCVA
SMLFA
In short
ILCV Value done the thorough way: roughly 400 large- and mid-cap US stocks screened on five separate value measures, not just cheap book value. Running since 2004 at four basis points, it's one of the cheapest tickets into the value factor.
SMLF Four factors (value, quality, momentum, low volatility) applied to roughly 900 U.S. small caps for 0.15% a year. Small-cap factor investing at a plain-index price, from the biggest ETF shop on the street.
Stated mandate
ILCV The fund seeks to track an index of U.S. large- and mid-cap stocks selected with value-oriented measures including forward earnings, book value, sales, cash flow, and dividend yield.
SMLF The Fund tracks an index of U.S. small-cap stocks selected for favorable exposure to style factors under constraints. Its rules-based index targets momentum, quality, value, and low volatility while controlling industry exposure, turnover, and risk relative to the parent index.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
ILCV vs SMLF Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
ILCV vs SMLF Cost
Overpaying SMLF vs ILCV
$2,288
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
ILCV 0.04%
$849
SMLF 0.15%
$3,137
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | ILCV | SMLF | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $73 | $274 | $201 |
| 20 | $288 | $1,071 | $783 |
| 30 | $849 | $3,137 | $2,288 |
- 0.04%ILCV, cheaper
- 0.15%SMLF
- Middle half of US Multifactor funds
- Median 0.29%
ILCV cheapest of 99 funds
SMLF 13th cheapest of 99 funds
ILCV vs SMLF Dividends
- ILCV 1.51%, better
- SMLF 0.99%
- ILCV $1.65
- SMLF $0.85
- ILCV $0.42
- SMLF $0.21
- ILCV Sep 15, 2026
- SMLF Sep 15, 2026
- ILCV Sep 18, 2026
- SMLF Sep 18, 2026
- ILCV Quarterly
- SMLF Quarterly
Distribution history
ILCV vs SMLF Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
- ILCV
- SMLF
Risk facts
- Volatility
- ILCV 10.7%, betterSMLF 17.2%
- Return per unit of risk
- ILCV 1.57, betterSMLF 0.99
- Worst fall
- ILCV −18.6%, betterSMLF −26.3%
- Market sensitivity
- ILCV 0.82SMLF 1.09
Popular comparisons
- 0.04% · 0.06%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.15% · 0.06%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.04% · 0.04%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.15% · 0.04%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.04% · 0.06%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.15% · 0.06%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.