VONV ranks 1st and SMLF 12th of 99 funds in the US Multifactor Category.
SMLF vs VONV
VONV −0.09pt a year
0.15%0.06%
VONV 4.3×the volume
179K774K
Same figure. Both funds show the same value, so neither comes out ahead.
+12.0%+12.0%
SMLF vs VONV Performance
+61.1%+73.8%
- SMLF 0.15%
- VONV 0.06%, better
- SMLF $4.21B
- VONV $23.3B
- SMLF +16.2%
- VONV +28.5%, better
- SMLF 0.99%
- VONV 1.53%, better
- SMLF 936
- VONV 873
- SMLF 179K sh
- VONV 774K sh, better
- SMLF $85.25
- VONV $113.44
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | SMLF | VONV |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A83 | A96Higher |
| Mission | A92 | A100Higher |
| Risk | D35 | A86Higher |
| Tradability | A71Higher | B60 |
| Holdings | A84Higher | C49 |
| Durability | A88 | A93Higher |
Rank among US Multifactor funds
Same Category. SMLF and VONV are both graded against the same 99 US Multifactor funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
SMLFA
VONVA
In short
SMLF Four factors (value, quality, momentum, low volatility) applied to roughly 900 U.S. small caps for 0.15% a year. Small-cap factor investing at a plain-index price, from the biggest ETF shop on the street.
VONV The plain-vanilla value trade, done cheap: about 900 large US value stocks, full replication of the Russell 1000 Value Index, 0.06% a year. No factor cocktail, no premium price tag, and one of the strongest implementations in its factor peer group.
Stated mandate
SMLF The Fund tracks an index of U.S. small-cap stocks selected for favorable exposure to style factors under constraints. Its rules-based index targets momentum, quality, value, and low volatility while controlling industry exposure, turnover, and risk relative to the parent index.
VONV The fund seeks to track the Russell 1000 Value Index, representing large-capitalization value stocks in the United States. It uses passive indexing and full replication to remain closely aligned with that benchmark.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
SMLF vs VONV Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
SMLF vs VONV Cost
Overpaying SMLF vs VONV
$1,867
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
SMLF 0.15%
$3,137
VONV 0.06%
$1,270
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | SMLF | VONV | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $274 | $110 | $164 |
| 20 | $1,071 | $432 | $639 |
| 30 | $3,137 | $1,270 | $1,867 |
- 0.15%SMLF
- 0.06%VONV, cheaper
- Middle half of US Multifactor funds
- Median 0.29%
VONV 4th cheapest of 99 funds
SMLF 13th cheapest of 99 funds
SMLF vs VONV Dividends
- SMLF 0.99%
- VONV 1.53%, better
- SMLF $0.85
- VONV $1.74
- SMLF $0.21
- VONV $0.42
- SMLF Sep 15, 2026
- VONV Sep 23, 2026
- SMLF Sep 18, 2026
- VONV Sep 25, 2026
- SMLF Quarterly
- VONV Quarterly
Distribution history
SMLF vs VONV Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
- SMLF
- VONV
Risk facts
- Volatility
- SMLF 17.2%VONV 12.1%, better
- Return per unit of risk
- SMLF 0.99VONV 1.43, better
- Worst fall
- SMLF −26.3%VONV −18.9%, better
- Market sensitivity
- SMLF 1.09VONV 0.85
SMLF and VONV in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.15% · 0.04%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.06% · 0.04%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.15% · 0.04%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.06% · 0.04%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.15% · 0.06%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.06% · 0.06%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

