JIRE ranks 3rd and ILOW 13th of 55 funds in the International Active Equity Category.
ILOW vs JIRE
JIRE −0.21pt a year
0.50%0.29%
JIRE 8.3×the volume
49.6K412K
ILOW vs JIRE Performance
+12.3%+13.3%
- ILOW 0.50%
- JIRE 0.29%, better
- ILOW $1.83B
- JIRE $10.9B
- ILOW +12.3%
- JIRE +13.3%, better
- ILOW 1.47%
- JIRE 2.74%, better
- ILOW 108
- JIRE 213
- ILOW 49.6K sh
- JIRE 412K sh, better
- ILOW $46.32
- JIRE $81.40
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | ILOW | JIRE |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | B66 | A94Higher |
| Mission | ||
| Risk | A74Higher | B59 |
| Tradability | B63 | A71Higher |
| Holdings | B59 | A71Higher |
| Durability | A72 | A93Higher |
Rank among International Active Equity funds
Same Category. ILOW and JIRE are both graded against the same 55 International Active Equity funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
ILOWB
JIREA
In short
ILOW Most international funds hunt growth. ILOW works the calm end of the pool: an actively run AB portfolio of overseas companies picked for steady profits, quiet price action, and sane valuations.
JIRE EAFE core with a stock-picker's fingerprints. JIRE holds sector and geographic risk close to the MSCI EAFE Index and expresses J.P. Morgan's global analyst calls as small over- and underweights, for 0.29% a year, below the typical active international fee.
Stated mandate
ILOW The fund seeks long-term growth of capital. It is actively managed and invests internationally with emphasis on sustainable profitability, price stability, and attractive valuations.
JIRE JIRE seeks long-term capital appreciation by investing primarily in foreign developed-market companies. It uses global fundamental research and seeks to outperform the MSCI EAFE Index while maintaining similar sector and geographic risk characteristics.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
ILOW vs JIRE Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
ILOW vs JIRE Cost
Overpaying ILOW vs JIRE
$4,027
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
ILOW 0.50%
$9,979
JIRE 0.29%
$5,952
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | ILOW | JIRE | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $900 | $527 | $373 |
| 20 | $3,460 | $2,044 | $1,416 |
| 30 | $9,979 | $5,952 | $4,027 |
- 0.50%ILOW
- 0.29%JIRE, cheaper
- Middle half of International Active Equity funds
- Median 0.55%
JIRE 5th cheapest of 55 funds
ILOW 18th cheapest of 55 funds
ILOW vs JIRE Dividends
- ILOW 1.47%
- JIRE 2.74%, better
- ILOW $0.68
- JIRE $2.24
- ILOW $0.68
- JIRE $2.24
- ILOW Dec 17, 2025
- JIRE Dec 16, 2025
- ILOW Dec 18, 2025
- JIRE Dec 18, 2025
- ILOW Irregular
- JIRE Annual
Distribution history
ILOW vs JIRE Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- ILOW 10.1%JIRE 11.8%
- Return per unit of risk
- ILOW 0.96JIRE 1.15
- Worst fall
- ILOW −10.4%JIRE −16.1%
- Market sensitivity
- ILOW 0.76JIRE 0.81
ILOW and JIRE in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.50% · 0.23%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.29% · 0.23%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.50% · 0.22%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.29% · 0.22%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.50% · 0.30%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.29% · 0.30%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.




