QBIF ranks 2nd and IMAY 13th of 26 funds in the Developed International Buffer 15% Category.
IMAY vs QBIF
0.0%by weight
QBIF −0.11pt a year
0.85%0.74%
IMAY 1.9×the volume
5.41K2.9K
IMAY vs QBIF Performance
−0.9%−0.9%
- IMAY 0.85%
- QBIF 0.74%, better
- IMAY $50M
- QBIF $9M
- IMAY +9.2%
- QBIF
- IMAY 3
- QBIF 3
- IMAY 5.41K sh, better
- QBIF 2.9K sh
- IMAY $31.72
- QBIF $25.95
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | IMAY | QBIF |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | D38 | A78Higher |
| Mission | ||
| Risk | B65 | A76Higher |
| Tradability | C46Higher | D35 |
| Holdings | B55 | |
| Durability | C48Higher | D26 |
Rank among Developed International Buffer 15% funds
Same Category. IMAY and QBIF are both graded against the same 26 Developed International Buffer 15% funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
IMAYC
QBIFB
In short
IMAY Most buffer ETFs hedge the S&P 500. This one aims the same machinery at developed international stocks: the first 15% of the underlying ETF's price decline absorbed over a May-to-April year, in exchange for a capped upside.
Stated mandate
IMAY The fund seeks to track the return of the iShares MSCI EAFE ETF (EFA), subject to a predetermined cap, while protecting against the first 15% of losses during the outcome period.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
IMAY vs QBIF Holdings
How IMAY and QBIF differ
0.0%
Shared holdings make up 0.0% of IMAY and 0.0% of QBIF.
Level by level
- Asset class0.0%
- Holdings0.0%
Sector
| Sector | More in IMAYMore in QBIF | IMAY | QBIF |
|---|---|---|---|
| Financials | Same weight | 26.1% | 26.1% |
| Industrials | Same weight | 18.7% | 18.7% |
| Technology | Same weight | 12.0% | 12.0% |
| Health Care | Same weight | 10.1% | 10.1% |
| Consumer Discretionary | Same weight | 7.1% | 7.1% |
| Consumer Staples | Same weight | 6.4% | 6.4% |
| Materials | Same weight | 5.8% | 5.8% |
| Communication | Same weight | 4.7% | 4.7% |
| Energy | Same weight | 4.0% | 4.0% |
| Utilities | Same weight | 3.6% | 3.6% |
| Real Estate | Same weight | 1.5% | 1.5% |
Country, concentration and asset class
Country
| Country | More in IMAYMore in QBIF | IMAY | QBIF |
|---|---|---|---|
| Japan | Same weight | 24.3% | 24.3% |
| United Kingdom | Same weight | 14.1% | 14.1% |
| Switzerland | Same weight | 10.2% | 10.2% |
| Germany | Same weight | 8.8% | 8.8% |
| France | Same weight | 8.3% | 8.3% |
| Australia | Same weight | 6.7% | 6.7% |
| Netherlands | Same weight | 6.0% | 6.0% |
| Spain | Same weight | 3.7% | 3.7% |
| Other countries (17) | Same weight | 18.0% | 18.0% |
Outside the US: IMAY 99% developed, 1% emerging. QBIF 99% developed, 1% emerging.
Concentration
- IMAY101.4%
- QBIF101.4%
- IMAY3
- QBIF2
Asset class
- IMAY
- Alternatives
- QBIF
- Equity
Holdings
- Only in IMAY3
- In both0
- Only in QBIF2
Only in IMAY
3 securities, 100% of IMAY by weight
- Efa 04/30/2027 1.02 C97.62%
- Efa 04/30/2027 102.32 P3.50%
- Us Bank Mmda - Usbgfs 9 09/01/20370.25%
Only in QBIF
2 securities, 100% of QBIF by weight
- Efa 12/31/2026 0.78 C98.11%
- Efa 12/31/2026 103.88 P2.74%
Weight gaps
IMAY and QBIF share no securities.
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
IMAY vs QBIF Cost
Overpaying IMAY vs QBIF
$1,892
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
IMAY 0.85%
$16,199
QBIF 0.74%
$14,307
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | IMAY | QBIF | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $1,508 | $1,319 | $189 |
| 20 | $5,706 | $5,015 | $691 |
| 30 | $16,199 | $14,307 | $1,892 |
- 0.85%IMAY
- 0.74%QBIF, cheaper
- Middle half of Developed International Buffer 15% funds
- Median 0.85%
QBIF 6th cheapest of 26 funds
IMAY 11th cheapest of 26 funds
IMAY vs QBIF Dividends
- IMAY None
- QBIF None
Distribution history
IMAY vs QBIF Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- IMAY 6.3%QBIF
- Return per unit of risk
- IMAY 0.76QBIF
- Worst fall
- IMAY −9.4%QBIF
- Market sensitivity
- IMAY 0.24QBIF 0.03
Popular comparisons
- 0.85% · 0.69%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.74% · 0.69%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.85% · 0.85%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.74% · 0.85%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.85% · 0.85%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.74% · 0.85%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.