Skip to content

IMAY vs QBIF

Innovator International Developed Power Buffer ETF - May

IMAYCNYSE Arca

AllianzIM International Equity Buffer15 ETF

QBIFBCboe

Overlap

0.0%by weight

Expense ratio

QBIF −0.11pt a year

IMAY0.85%QBIF0.74%

Avg volume · 30D

IMAY 1.9×the volume

IMAY5.41KQBIF2.9K

IMAY vs QBIF Performance

Jul 31, 2026 – Nov 2, 2026

−0.9%IMAY−0.9%QBIF

Jul 31, 2026 to Nov 2, 2026. IMAY −0.9%. QBIF −0.9%. Use the arrow keys to read each point.0%0.5%1%1.5%Jul 2026Sep 2026Nov 2026
Expense ratio
IMAY 0.85%
QBIF 0.74%, better
Fund size
IMAY $50M
QBIF $9M
1Y total return
IMAY +9.2%
QBIF No data
Holdings
IMAY 3
QBIF 3
Avg volume (30D)
IMAY 5.41K sh, better
QBIF 2.9K sh
NAV per share
IMAY $31.72
QBIF $25.95
52W range

ETF.net Grade

IMAY: Cost 38, Risk 65, Mission not scored, Tradability 46, Holdings not scored, Durability 48. QBIF: Cost 78, Risk 76, Mission not scored, Tradability 35, Holdings 55, Durability 26.
Pillar letters and Scores for IMAY, QBIF, with each pillar’s weight
PillarIMAYQBIF
Cost30% weightD38A78Higher
Mission25% weightNot scoredNot scored
Risk15% weightB65A76Higher
Tradability15% weightC46HigherD35
Holdings10% weightNot scoredB55
Durability5% weightC48HigherD26

Rank among Developed International Buffer 15% funds

Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Same Category. IMAY and QBIF are both graded against the same 26 Developed International Buffer 15% funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

See all 26 ›

QBIF ranks 2nd and IMAY 13th of 26 funds in the Developed International Buffer 15% Category.

  1. Rank 1BBUFIAB International Buffer ETFScore 65
  2. Rank 2BQBIFAllianzIM International Equity Buffer15 ETFScore 63
  3. Rank 3BIAUGInnovator Intl Developed Power Buffer ETFScore 58
  4. Rank 13CIFEBInnovator Intl Developed Power Buffer ETFScore 46
  5. Rank 13CIMAYInnovator International Developed Power Buffer ETF - MayScore 46
  6. Rank 15CIDECInnovator Intl Developed Power Buffer ETFScore 45

Our read on each fund

ETF.net Research

IMAYCInnovator International Developed Power Buffer ETF - May

QBIFBAllianzIM International Equity Buffer15 ETF

In short

IMAY Most buffer ETFs hedge the S&P 500. This one aims the same machinery at developed international stocks: the first 15% of the underlying ETF's price decline absorbed over a May-to-April year, in exchange for a capped upside.

QBIF No data

Stated mandate

IMAY The fund seeks to track the return of the iShares MSCI EAFE ETF (EFA), subject to a predetermined cap, while protecting against the first 15% of losses during the outcome period.

QBIF No data

Why people hold it

  • IMAY The prospectus spells out the trade upfront: first 15% of the underlying ETF's price decline absorbed, upside capped, period running May 1 to April 30, then a new period starts instead of the fund closing.sec.gov
  • At 0.85% a year it sits right at the median for international buffer funds, and it ranks among the stronger implementations in that peer group.
  • The payoff is built from FLEX options on the iShares MSCI EAFE ETF, cleared through the Options Clearing Corporation rather than resting on one bank's structured note.sec.gov
  • One rung of a 12-month ladder: Innovator runs this same EAFE strategy with a start month for every month of the year (IMAR, IAPR, IJUL and the rest), so entries can be staggered.

QBIF No data

Worth knowing

  • IMAY Upside stops at the cap set for each period, so a strong year in developed markets leaves gains on the table.sec.gov
  • The 15% buffer is measured before fees, and the 0.85% management fee trims what you keep. Buy mid-period and you inherit whatever buffer and cap remain, not the headline pair.sec.gov
  • Outcomes track the underlying ETF's price only, so its dividends don't flow through and the fund isn't a source of regular income. Shares also trade lightly, so spreads deserve a look.sec.gov

QBIF No data

Full IMAY profile⁠

Full QBIF profile⁠

IMAY vs QBIF Holdings

How IMAY and QBIF differ

Overlap by weight

0.0%

Shared holdings make up 0.0% of IMAY and 0.0% of QBIF.

Level by level

  • Asset classAlternatives, Equity0.0%
  • Holdings0 in both0.0%
  • Countryby domicile100%
  • Sector11 Sectors100%

Sector

Sector weights in IMAY and QBIF, widest gap first
SectorMore in IMAYMore in QBIF
FinancialsSame weight
IndustrialsSame weight
TechnologySame weight
Health CareSame weight
Consumer DiscretionarySame weight
Consumer StaplesSame weight
MaterialsSame weight
CommunicationSame weight
EnergySame weight
UtilitiesSame weight
Real EstateSame weight

Country, concentration and asset class

Country by domicile

Country weights in IMAY and QBIF, widest gap first
CountryMore in IMAYMore in QBIF
JapanSame weight
United KingdomSame weight
SwitzerlandSame weight
GermanySame weight
FranceSame weight
AustraliaSame weight
NetherlandsSame weight
SpainSame weight
Other countries (17)Same weight

Outside the US: IMAY 99% developed, 1% emerging. QBIF 99% developed, 1% emerging.

Concentration

Weight in the 10 largest Holdings

  • IMAY101.4%
  • QBIF101.4%

Securities held

  • IMAY3
  • QBIF2

Asset class

IMAY
Alternatives
QBIF
Equity

Holdings

  • Only in IMAY3
  • In both0
  • Only in QBIF2

Only in IMAY

3 securities, 100% of IMAY by weight

  • Efa 04/30/2027 1.02 C97.62%
  • Efa 04/30/2027 102.32 P3.50%
  • Us Bank Mmda - Usbgfs 9 09/01/20370.25%

Only in QBIF

2 securities, 100% of QBIF by weight

  • Efa 12/31/2026 0.78 C98.11%
  • Efa 12/31/2026 103.88 P2.74%

Weight gaps

IMAY and QBIF share no securities.

All IMAY holdings⁠All 5 QBIF holdings⁠

How we measure overlap

Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.

IMAY vs QBIF Cost

Overpaying IMAY vs QBIF

$1,892

On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.

  • IMAY 0.85%

    $16,199

  • QBIF 0.74%

    $14,307

$10,000
30 years

Cost over time

  • IMAY 0.85%
  • QBIF 0.74%
  • Overpaying
One line per fund, from year 0 to year 30. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$5K$10K$15K$20K051015202530IMAY $16,199QBIF $14,307

Year by year

YearIMAYQBIFOverpaying
10$1,508$1,319$189
20$5,706$5,015$691
30$16,199$14,307$1,892

Expense ratio

  • 0.85%IMAY
  • 0.74%QBIF, cheaper
  • Middle half of Developed International Buffer 15% funds
  • Median 0.85%

QBIF 6th cheapest of 26 funds

IMAY 11th cheapest of 26 funds

IMAY vs QBIF Dividends

Last 12 months to Nov 2, 2026
Payout (12M)
IMAY None
QBIF None

Distribution history

IMAYAll IMAY payments⁠

No distribution history available.

QBIFAll QBIF payments⁠

No distribution history available.

IMAY vs QBIF Risk

Fall from peak · 5 years

This chart needs five years of history for both funds.

Risk facts

VolatilityStd dev, 3 years
IMAY 6.3%since Jun 2024QBIF No data
Return per unit of riskSharpe ratio, 3 years
IMAY 0.76since Jun 2024QBIF No data
Worst fallMax drawdown, 5 years
IMAY −9.4%since May 2024QBIF No data
Market sensitivityBeta, 5 years
IMAY 0.24QBIF 0.03

Popular comparisons

  • IMAYCvsBUFIB

    Innovator International Developed Power Buffer ETF - May · AB International Buffer ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.85% · 0.69%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • QBIFBvsBUFIB

    AllianzIM International Equity Buffer15 ETF · AB International Buffer ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.74% · 0.69%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • IMAYCvsIAUGB

    Innovator International Developed Power Buffer ETF - May · Innovator Intl Developed Power Buffer ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.85% · 0.85%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • QBIFBvsIAUGB

    AllianzIM International Equity Buffer15 ETF · Innovator Intl Developed Power Buffer ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.74% · 0.85%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • IMAYCvsIJULB

    Innovator International Developed Power Buffer ETF - May · Innovator Intl Developed Power Buffer ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.85% · 0.85%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • QBIFBvsIJULB

    AllianzIM International Equity Buffer15 ETF · Innovator Intl Developed Power Buffer ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.74% · 0.85%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.