IMCB ranks 1st and VO 3rd of 13 funds in the US Mid-Cap Category.
IMCB vs VO
VO −0.01pt a year
0.04%0.03%
VO 79.4×the volume
35.8K2.84M
IMCB +0.1pt
+11.8%+11.7%
IMCB vs VO Performance
+49.4%+39.6%
- IMCB 0.04%
- VO 0.03%, better
- IMCB $1.75B
- VO $217B
- IMCB +20.1%, better
- VO +13.6%
- IMCB 1.22%
- VO 1.35%, better
- IMCB 396
- VO 277
- IMCB 35.8K sh
- VO 2.84M sh, better
- IMCB $97.86
- VO $81.46
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | IMCB | VO |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A86 | A86 |
| Mission | A100 | A100 |
| Risk | A76Higher | B67 |
| Tradability | B60 | B60 |
| Holdings | A72Higher | C49 |
| Durability | A70 | A92Higher |
Rank among US Mid-Cap funds
Same Category. IMCB and VO are both graded against the same 13 US Mid-Cap funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
IMCBA
VOA
In short
IMCB Mid-cap America for four basis points, running since 2004. It samples Morningstar's US mid-cap index across roughly 400 stocks and hews to that benchmark about as closely as anything in its category.
VO The plain middle of the US market for three basis points. VO owns roughly 300 stocks sitting between the 70th and 85th percentile of investable market cap, each at index weight, with buffer bands that slow the churn at the edges.
Stated mandate
IMCB The Fund seeks to track an index of mid-capitalization U.S. equities. It uses indexing and representative sampling rather than trying to outperform the index.
VO The fund seeks to track the CRSP US Mid Cap Index by investing in its U.S. mid-cap stocks through passive, full replication.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
IMCB vs VO Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
IMCB vs VO Cost
Overpaying IMCB vs VO
$211
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
IMCB 0.04%
$849
VO 0.03%
$638
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | IMCB | VO | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $73 | $55 | $18 |
| 20 | $288 | $216 | $72 |
| 30 | $849 | $638 | $211 |
- 0.04%IMCB
- 0.03%VO, cheaper
- Middle half of US Mid-Cap funds
- Median 0.15%
VO cheapest of 13 funds
IMCB 3rd cheapest of 13 funds
IMCB vs VO Dividends
- IMCB 1.22%
- VO 1.35%, better
- IMCB $1.20
- VO $1.10
- IMCB $0.32
- VO $0.29
- IMCB Sep 15, 2026
- VO Sep 28, 2026
- IMCB Sep 18, 2026
- VO Sep 30, 2026
- IMCB Quarterly
- VO Quarterly
Distribution history
IMCB vs VO Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
- IMCB
- VO
Risk facts
- Volatility
- IMCB 13.9%VO 13.5%, better
- Return per unit of risk
- IMCB 1.16, betterVO 1.09
- Worst fall
- IMCB −25.1%, betterVO −27.6%
- Market sensitivity
- IMCB 1.00VO 1.00Same figure. Both funds show the same value, so neither comes out ahead.
IMCB and VO in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.04% · 0.03%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.03% · 0.03%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.04% · 0.18%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.03% · 0.18%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.04% · 0.04%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.03% · 0.04%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
