Skip to content

IMCB vs VO

iShares Morningstar Mid-Cap ETF

IMCBANYSE Arca

Vanguard Morningstar Mid-Cap ETF

VOANYSE Arca

Overlap

Expense ratio

VO −0.01pt a year

IMCB0.04%VO0.03%

Avg volume · 30D

VO 79.4×the volume

IMCB35.8KVO2.84M

10Y return · a year

IMCB +0.1pt

IMCB+11.8%VO+11.7%

IMCB vs VO Performance

Oct 29, 2021 – Oct 30, 2026

+49.4%IMCB+39.6%VO

Oct 29, 2021 to Oct 30, 2026. IMCB +49.4%. VO +39.6%. Use the arrow keys to read each point.−20%0%20%Oct 2021Apr 2024Oct 2026
Expense ratio
IMCB 0.04%
VO 0.03%, better
Fund size
IMCB $1.75B
VO $217B
1Y total return
IMCB +20.1%, better
VO +13.6%
Yield (12M)
IMCB 1.22%
VO 1.35%, better
Holdings
IMCB 396
VO 277
Avg volume (30D)
IMCB 35.8K sh
VO 2.84M sh, better
NAV per share
IMCB $97.86
VO $81.46
52W range

ETF.net Grade

IMCB: Cost 86, Risk 76, Mission 100, Tradability 60, Holdings 72, Durability 70. VO: Cost 86, Risk 67, Mission 100, Tradability 60, Holdings 49, Durability 92.
Pillar letters and Scores for IMCB, VO, with each pillar’s weight
PillarIMCBVO
Cost30% weightA86A86
Mission25% weightA100A100
Risk15% weightA76HigherB67
Tradability15% weightB60B60
Holdings10% weightA72HigherC49
Durability5% weightA70A92Higher

Rank among US Mid-Cap funds

Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Same Category. IMCB and VO are both graded against the same 13 US Mid-Cap funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

US Mid-Cap⁠

Category · 13 funds
See all 13 ›

IMCB ranks 1st and VO 3rd of 13 funds in the US Mid-Cap Category.

  1. Rank 1AIMCBiShares Morningstar Mid-Cap ETFScore 82
  2. Rank 2ASCHMSchwab U.S. Mid-Cap ETFScore 80
  3. Rank 3AVOVanguard Morningstar Mid-Cap ETFScore 79
  4. Rank 4AIWRiShares Russell Mid-Cap ETFScore 74

Our read on each fund

ETF.net Research

IMCBAiShares Morningstar Mid-Cap ETF

VOAVanguard Morningstar Mid-Cap ETF

In short

IMCB Mid-cap America for four basis points, running since 2004. It samples Morningstar's US mid-cap index across roughly 400 stocks and hews to that benchmark about as closely as anything in its category.

VO The plain middle of the US market for three basis points. VO owns roughly 300 stocks sitting between the 70th and 85th percentile of investable market cap, each at index weight, with buffer bands that slow the churn at the edges.

Stated mandate

IMCB The Fund seeks to track an index of mid-capitalization U.S. equities. It uses indexing and representative sampling rather than trying to outperform the index.

VO The fund seeks to track the CRSP US Mid Cap Index by investing in its U.S. mid-cap stocks through passive, full replication.

Why people hold it

  • IMCB Costs 0.04% a year, against roughly 0.15% typical for the mid-cap group.
  • Indexing, not opinions: representative sampling of the Morningstar US Mid Cap Index, with tracking among the tightest in its peer group.ishares.com
  • Trading since 2004 and now a multi-billion-dollar fund, so there is a long operating history here, not a launch-year story.
  • About 400 names covering both the growth and value sides of US mid caps, so no style tilt is baked in.
  • VO Costs 0.03% a year against a 0.15% median for mid-cap peers, matching SCHM as the cheapest in the group and undercutting IWR by a wide margin.
  • Full replication, not sampling: it holds the index's roughly 300 names at index weight, and its tracking is among the tightest in the mid-cap group.vanguard.com
  • Trading since 2004 as a share class of Vanguard's Mid-Cap Index Fund, it has grown into one of the largest and most actively traded mid-cap index funds.sec.gov
  • CRSP draws the mid-cap line by percentage of market cap, not a fixed stock count, with buffer zones at the edges so companies migrate gradually rather than jumping buckets.crsp.orgbogleheads.org

Worth knowing

  • IMCB Thinly traded next to the category's household names, so spreads and order handling matter more at the moment of a trade.
  • All US, all stocks: mid caps move harder than mega caps, and nothing else in the portfolio cushions an equity selloff.
  • VO and SCHM cover similar ground at 0.03%, so the cost edge here is over the group average rather than over the cheapest rivals.
  • VO Mid caps move harder than blue chips, and Vanguard flags that: the fund sits at the top of its own 1-to-5 risk scale.vanguard.com
  • One band of the market by design. No mega caps, no small caps, so it covers the middle rather than the whole US market.crsp.org
  • About 300 stocks is a narrower net than a total-market fund casts, and sector weights are simply whatever the middle of the market looks like at the time.

Full IMCB profile⁠

Full VO profile⁠

IMCB vs VO Holdings

How we measure overlap

Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.

IMCB vs VO Cost

Overpaying IMCB vs VO

$211

On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.

  • IMCB 0.04%

    $849

  • VO 0.03%

    $638

$10,000
30 years

Cost over time

  • IMCB 0.04%
  • VO 0.03%
  • Overpaying
One line per fund, from year 0 to year 30. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$200$400$600$800$1K051015202530IMCB $849VO $638

Year by year

YearIMCBVOOverpaying
10$73$55$18
20$288$216$72
30$849$638$211

Expense ratio

  • 0.04%IMCB
  • 0.03%VO, cheaper
  • Middle half of US Mid-Cap funds
  • Median 0.15%

VO cheapest of 13 funds

IMCB 3rd cheapest of 13 funds

IMCB vs VO Dividends

Last 12 months to Oct 30, 2026
Yield (12M)
IMCB 1.22%
VO 1.35%, better
Payout (12M)
IMCB $1.20
VO $1.10
Last payment
IMCB $0.32
VO $0.29
Ex-dividend
IMCB Sep 15, 2026
VO Sep 28, 2026
Paid on
IMCB Sep 18, 2026
VO Sep 30, 2026
Frequency
IMCB Quarterly
VO Quarterly

Distribution history

Per share, 2017 to 2026, same scale for both

IMCBQuarterly · 40 paymentsAll IMCB payments⁠
One bar per payment. 40 payments from 2017 to 2026 YTD. Mar 24, 2017 $0.13; May 1, 2017 $0.004; Jun 27, 2017 $0.14; Sep 26, 2017 $0.15; Dec 19, 2017 $0.18; Mar 22, 2018 $0.13; Jun 26, 2018 $0.16; Sep 26, 2018 $0.26; Dec 17, 2018 $0.18; Mar 20, 2019 $0.17; Jun 17, 2019 $0.17; Sep 24, 2019 $0.18; Dec 16, 2019 $0.18; Mar 25, 2020 $0.17; Jun 15, 2020 $0.13; Sep 23, 2020 $0.17; Dec 14, 2020 $0.18; Mar 25, 2021 $0.13; Jun 10, 2021 $0.16; Sep 24, 2021 $0.24; Dec 13, 2021 $0.24; Mar 24, 2022 $0.22; Jun 9, 2022 $0.19; Sep 26, 2022 $0.29; Dec 13, 2022 $0.30; Mar 23, 2023 $0.24; Jun 7, 2023 $0.19; Sep 26, 2023 $0.30; Dec 20, 2023 $0.32; Mar 21, 2024 $0.24; Jun 11, 2024 $0.22; Sep 25, 2024 $0.32; Dec 17, 2024 $0.31; Mar 18, 2025 $0.26; Jun 16, 2025 $0.26; Sep 16, 2025 $0.30; Dec 16, 2025 $0.35; Mar 17, 2026 $0.24; Jun 15, 2026 $0.28; Sep 15, 2026 $0.32. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$0.252017202020232026YTD
VOQuarterly · 39 paymentsAll VO payments⁠
One bar per payment. 39 payments from 2017 to 2026 YTD. Mar 29, 2017 $0.12; Jun 23, 2017 $0.12; Sep 27, 2017 $0.13; Dec 21, 2017 $0.16; Mar 22, 2018 $0.13; Jun 22, 2018 $0.14; Sep 28, 2018 $0.19; Dec 24, 2018 $0.17; Mar 28, 2019 $0.14; Jun 27, 2019 $0.14; Sep 16, 2019 $0.13; Dec 24, 2019 $0.25; Mar 10, 2020 $0.18; Jun 25, 2020 $0.17; Sep 25, 2020 $0.17; Dec 24, 2020 $0.23; Mar 25, 2021 $0.16; Jun 24, 2021 $0.17; Sep 24, 2021 $0.15; Dec 27, 2021 $0.23; Mar 23, 2022 $0.19; Jun 23, 2022 $0.15; Sep 23, 2022 $0.20; Dec 22, 2022 $0.28; Mar 23, 2023 $0.19; Jun 23, 2023 $0.20; Sep 21, 2023 $0.19; Dec 21, 2023 $0.30; Mar 21, 2024 $0.24; Jun 27, 2024 $0.23; Sep 26, 2024 $0.24; Dec 23, 2024 $0.27; Mar 27, 2025 $0.29; Jun 30, 2025 $0.27; Sep 29, 2025 $0.26; Dec 22, 2025 $0.29; Mar 27, 2026 $0.27; Jun 26, 2026 $0.26; Sep 28, 2026 $0.29. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$0.252017202020232026YTD

IMCB vs VO Risk

Fall from peak · 5 years

  • IMCB
  • VO
Oct 29, 2021 to Oct 30, 2026. Worst fall: VO −27.6% · Oct 2022. Use the arrow keys to read each point.−25%−20%−15%−10%−5%0%Oct 2021Apr 2024Oct 2026

Risk facts

VolatilityStd dev, 3 years
IMCB 13.9%VO 13.5%, better
Return per unit of riskSharpe ratio, 3 years
IMCB 1.16, betterVO 1.09
Worst fallMax drawdown, 5 years
IMCB −25.1%, betterVO −27.6%
Market sensitivityBeta, 5 years
IMCB 1.00VO 1.00Same figure. Both funds show the same value, so neither comes out ahead.

IMCB and VO in the news

Popular comparisons

  • IMCBAvsSCHMA

    iShares Morningstar Mid-Cap ETF · Schwab U.S. Mid-Cap ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.04% · 0.03%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • VOAvsSCHMA

    Vanguard Morningstar Mid-Cap ETF · Schwab U.S. Mid-Cap ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.03% · 0.03%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • IMCBAvsIWRA

    iShares Morningstar Mid-Cap ETF · iShares Russell Mid-Cap ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.04% · 0.18%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • VOAvsIWRA

    Vanguard Morningstar Mid-Cap ETF · iShares Russell Mid-Cap ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.03% · 0.18%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • IMCBAvsBKMCA

    iShares Morningstar Mid-Cap ETF · BNY Mellon US Mid Cap Core Equity ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.04% · 0.04%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • VOAvsBKMCA

    Vanguard Morningstar Mid-Cap ETF · BNY Mellon US Mid Cap Core Equity ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.03% · 0.04%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.