IMCB ranks 1st and IWR 4th of 13 funds in the US Mid-Cap Category.
IMCB vs IWR
IMCB −0.14pt a year
0.04%0.18%
IWR 50.0×the volume
35.8K1.79M
IMCB +0.2pt
+11.8%+11.6%
IMCB vs IWR Performance
+49.4%+42.1%
- IMCB 0.04%, better
- IWR 0.18%
- IMCB $1.75B
- IWR $58.1B
- IMCB +20.1%, better
- IWR +16.3%
- IMCB 1.22%, better
- IWR 1.16%
- IMCB 396
- IWR 827
- IMCB 35.8K sh
- IWR 1.79M sh, better
- IMCB $97.86
- IWR $110.06
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | IMCB | IWR |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A86Higher | C43 |
| Mission | A100 | A100 |
| Risk | A76Higher | B68 |
| Tradability | B60 | A93Higher |
| Holdings | A72 | A83Higher |
| Durability | A70 | A86Higher |
Rank among US Mid-Cap funds
Same Category. IMCB and IWR are both graded against the same 13 US Mid-Cap funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
IMCBA
IWRA
In short
IMCB Mid-cap America for four basis points, running since 2004. It samples Morningstar's US mid-cap index across roughly 400 stocks and hews to that benchmark about as closely as anything in its category.
IWR The Russell mid-cap standard: roughly 800 mid-sized US companies in one ticker, tracked since 2001. Big, heavily traded, and priced a notch above the index-fund floor.
Stated mandate
IMCB The Fund seeks to track an index of mid-capitalization U.S. equities. It uses indexing and representative sampling rather than trying to outperform the index.
IWR The fund seeks to track an index composed of mid-sized U.S. companies.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
IMCB vs IWR Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
IMCB vs IWR Cost
Overpaying IWR vs IMCB
$2,900
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
IMCB 0.04%
$849
IWR 0.18%
$3,749
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | IMCB | IWR | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $73 | $328 | $255 |
| 20 | $288 | $1,281 | $993 |
| 30 | $849 | $3,749 | $2,900 |
- 0.04%IMCB, cheaper
- 0.18%IWR
- Middle half of US Mid-Cap funds
- Median 0.15%
IMCB 3rd cheapest of 13 funds
IWR 8th cheapest of 13 funds
IMCB vs IWR Dividends
- IMCB 1.22%, better
- IWR 1.16%
- IMCB $1.20
- IWR $1.27
- IMCB $0.32
- IWR $0.33
- IMCB Sep 15, 2026
- IWR Sep 15, 2026
- IMCB Sep 18, 2026
- IWR Sep 18, 2026
- IMCB Quarterly
- IWR Quarterly
Distribution history
IMCB vs IWR Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
- IMCB
- IWR
Risk facts
- Volatility
- IMCB 13.9%, betterIWR 14.1%
- Return per unit of risk
- IMCB 1.16, betterIWR 1.08
- Worst fall
- IMCB −25.1%, betterIWR −26.2%
- Market sensitivity
- IMCB 1.00IWR 1.01
Popular comparisons
- 0.04% · 0.03%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.18% · 0.03%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.04% · 0.03%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.18% · 0.03%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.04% · 0.04%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.18% · 0.04%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.