IUSB ranks 2nd and IMTB 17th of 114 funds in the US Aggregate Bond Category.
IMTB vs IUSB
IUSB −0.01pt a year
0.07%0.06%
IUSB 91.8×the volume
66.7K6.13M
IMTB +0.2pt
+0.4%+0.2%
IMTB vs IUSB Performance
+1.9%+0.9%
- IMTB 0.07%
- IUSB 0.06%, better
- IMTB $283M
- IUSB $50.2B
- IMTB −0.1%
- IUSB 0.0%, better
- IMTB 4.64%, better
- IUSB 4.32%
- IMTB 3598
- IUSB 18280
- IMTB 66.7K sh
- IUSB 6.13M sh, better
- IMTB $42.29
- IUSB $44.91
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | IMTB | IUSB |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A88 | A92Higher |
| Mission | A99 | A100Higher |
| Risk | C44 | C54Higher |
| Tradability | B58 | A89Higher |
| Holdings | B65 | A76Higher |
| Durability | B66 | A94Higher |
Rank among US Aggregate Bond funds
Same Category. IMTB and IUSB are both graded against the same 114 US Aggregate Bond funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
IMTBA
IUSBA
In short
IMTB Most core bond funds hand you the entire yield curve. IMTB takes only the 5-to-10-year belly, and its index reaches past the Agg into high yield, for seven basis points a year.
IUSB Most core bond funds stop at investment grade. IUSB keeps going, folding high-yield USD debt into the same wrapper across roughly 18,000 bonds, for 0.06% a year.
Stated mandate
IMTB The fund seeks to track an index of U.S.-dollar-denominated investment-grade and high-yield bonds with remaining maturities between five and ten years.
IUSB The Fund seeks to track an index of U.S.-dollar-denominated bonds spanning investment-grade and high-yield sectors.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
IMTB vs IUSB Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
IMTB vs IUSB Cost
Overpaying IMTB vs IUSB
$210
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
IMTB 0.07%
$1,480
IUSB 0.06%
$1,270
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | IMTB | IUSB | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $128 | $110 | $18 |
| 20 | $503 | $432 | $71 |
| 30 | $1,480 | $1,270 | $210 |
- 0.07%IMTB
- 0.06%IUSB, cheaper
- Middle half of US Aggregate Bond funds
- Median 0.34%
IUSB 10th cheapest of 114 funds
IMTB 12th cheapest of 114 funds
IMTB vs IUSB Dividends
- IMTB 4.64%, better
- IUSB 4.32%
- IMTB $1.96
- IUSB $1.94
- IMTB $0.17
- IUSB $0.15
- IMTB Oct 1, 2026
- IUSB Oct 1, 2026
- IMTB Oct 6, 2026
- IUSB Oct 6, 2026
- IMTB Monthly
- IUSB Monthly
Distribution history
IMTB vs IUSB Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
- IMTB
- IUSB
Risk facts
- Volatility
- IMTB 6.2%IUSB 5.5%, better
- Return per unit of risk
- IMTB 0.31, betterIUSB 0.25
- Worst fall
- IMTB −17.4%IUSB −17.4%Same figure. Both funds show the same value, so neither comes out ahead.
- Market sensitivity
- IMTB 1.05IUSB 0.96
IMTB and IUSB in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.07% · 0.03%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.06% · 0.03%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.07% · 0.03%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.06% · 0.03%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.07% · 0.03%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.06% · 0.03%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
