SPAB ranks 2nd and IMTB 17th of 114 funds in the US Aggregate Bond Category.
IMTB vs SPAB
SPAB −0.04pt a year
0.07%0.03%
SPAB 46.7×the volume
66.7K3.11M
IMTB +0.6pt
+0.4%−0.2%
IMTB vs SPAB Performance
+1.9%−0.9%
- IMTB 0.07%
- SPAB 0.03%, better
- IMTB $283M
- SPAB $10.4B
- IMTB −0.1%, better
- SPAB −0.2%
- IMTB 4.64%, better
- SPAB 4.20%
- IMTB 3598
- SPAB 8697
- IMTB 66.7K sh
- SPAB 3.11M sh, better
- IMTB $42.29
- SPAB $24.78
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | IMTB | SPAB |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A88 | A97Higher |
| Mission | A99 | A100Higher |
| Risk | C44 | C47Higher |
| Tradability | B58 | A90Higher |
| Holdings | B65 | A76Higher |
| Durability | B66 | A91Higher |
Rank among US Aggregate Bond funds
Same Category. IMTB and SPAB are both graded against the same 114 US Aggregate Bond funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
IMTBA
SPABA
In short
IMTB Most core bond funds hand you the entire yield curve. IMTB takes only the 5-to-10-year belly, and its index reaches past the Agg into high yield, for seven basis points a year.
SPAB A 2007-vintage core bond fund priced at 0.03%: roughly 8,500 US investment-grade bonds in one ticket, at the same rock-bottom fee the household names charge for the same index.
Stated mandate
IMTB The fund seeks to track an index of U.S.-dollar-denominated investment-grade and high-yield bonds with remaining maturities between five and ten years.
SPAB The fund seeks to track the price and yield performance of the Bloomberg U.S. Aggregate Bond Index before fees and expenses, providing broad exposure to U.S.-dollar-denominated investment-grade bonds.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
IMTB vs SPAB Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
IMTB vs SPAB Cost
Overpaying IMTB vs SPAB
$842
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
IMTB 0.07%
$1,480
SPAB 0.03%
$638
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | IMTB | SPAB | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $128 | $55 | $73 |
| 20 | $503 | $216 | $287 |
| 30 | $1,480 | $638 | $842 |
- 0.07%IMTB
- 0.03%SPAB, cheaper
- Middle half of US Aggregate Bond funds
- Median 0.34%
SPAB 2nd cheapest of 114 funds
IMTB 12th cheapest of 114 funds
IMTB vs SPAB Dividends
- IMTB 4.64%, better
- SPAB 4.20%
- IMTB $1.96
- SPAB $1.04
- IMTB $0.17
- SPAB $0.09
- IMTB Oct 1, 2026
- SPAB Oct 1, 2026
- IMTB Oct 6, 2026
- SPAB Oct 6, 2026
- IMTB Monthly
- SPAB Monthly
Distribution history
IMTB vs SPAB Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
- IMTB
- SPAB
Risk facts
- Volatility
- IMTB 6.2%SPAB 5.6%, better
- Return per unit of risk
- IMTB 0.31, betterSPAB 0.17
- Worst fall
- IMTB −17.4%SPAB −17.4%Same figure. Both funds show the same value, so neither comes out ahead.
- Market sensitivity
- IMTB 1.05SPAB 1.00
IMTB and SPAB in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.07% · 0.03%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.03% · 0.03%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.07% · 0.06%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.03% · 0.06%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.07% · 0.03%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.03% · 0.03%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

