IRTR ranks 3rd and INCE 4th of 37 funds in the Multi-Asset Allocation Category.
INCE vs IRTR
IRTR −0.21pt a year
0.29%0.08%
INCE 3.7×the volume
47.3K12.7K
INCE +6.0pt
+19.1%+13.1%
INCE vs IRTR Performance
+22.6%+5.1%
- INCE 0.29%
- IRTR 0.08%, better
- INCE $368M
- IRTR $60M
- INCE +22.6%, better
- IRTR +5.1%
- INCE 5.28%, better
- IRTR 3.17%
- INCE 112
- IRTR 29140
- INCE 47.3K sh, better
- IRTR 12.7K sh
- INCE $68.80
- IRTR $31.52
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | INCE | IRTR |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A82 | A97Higher |
| Mission | A100 | |
| Risk | B64 | A82Higher |
| Tradability | B65Higher | B62 |
| Holdings | A74 | A80Higher |
| Durability | A85Higher | B56 |
Rank among Multi-Asset Allocation funds
Same Category. INCE and IRTR are both graded against the same 37 Multi-Asset Allocation funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
INCEA
IRTRA
In short
INCE Franklin's income playbook run through stocks instead of bonds: roughly 100 equity-focused positions, monthly payouts, and an objective that targets lower volatility than the S&P 500, at a fee well under the typical allocation fund.
IRTR A whole retirement portfolio in one ticker: global stock and bond ETFs blended at the conservative end, for 0.08% a year. That is index-fund pricing on a job most allocation funds charge roughly ten times more to do.
Stated mandate
INCE The Fund seeks income from equity securities and related instruments while also pursuing capital appreciation and lower volatility than the S&P 500 Index.
IRTR The fund seeks conservative exposure through a broad portfolio of stock and bond ETFs spanning global asset classes.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
INCE vs IRTR Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
INCE vs IRTR Cost
Overpaying INCE vs IRTR
$4,263
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
INCE 0.29%
$5,952
IRTR 0.08%
$1,689
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | INCE | IRTR | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $527 | $147 | $380 |
| 20 | $2,044 | $575 | $1,469 |
| 30 | $5,952 | $1,689 | $4,263 |
- 0.29%INCE
- 0.08%IRTR, cheaper
- Middle half of Multi-Asset Allocation funds
- Median 0.57%
IRTR 2nd cheapest of 37 funds
INCE 7th cheapest of 37 funds
INCE vs IRTR Dividends
- INCE 5.28%, better
- IRTR 3.17%
- INCE $3.64
- IRTR $1.00
- INCE $0.30
- IRTR $0.08
- INCE Oct 30, 2026
- IRTR Oct 2, 2026
- INCE Pays Nov 4, 2026
- IRTR Oct 7, 2026
- INCE Monthly
- IRTR Monthly
Distribution history
INCE vs IRTR Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- INCE 10.8%IRTR 7.3%, better
- Return per unit of risk
- INCE 1.28, betterIRTR 1.14
- Worst fall
- INCE −18.4%IRTR −6.3%
- Market sensitivity
- INCE 0.60IRTR 0.47
Popular comparisons
- 0.29% · 0.06%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.08% · 0.06%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.29% · 0.15%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.08% · 0.15%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.29% · 0.32%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.08% · 0.32%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.