VT ranks 1st and IOO 5th of 6 funds in the MSCI ACWI / World Category.
IOO vs VT
VT −0.34pt a year
0.40%0.06%
VT 12.8×the volume
206K2.63M
IOO +3.8pt
+16.2%+12.4%
IOO vs VT Performance
+95.8%+57.4%
- IOO 0.40%
- VT 0.06%, better
- IOO $9.04B
- VT $81.8B
- IOO +13.1%
- VT +13.3%, better
- IOO 0.83%
- VT 1.55%, better
- IOO 113
- VT 10220
- IOO 206K sh
- VT 2.63M sh, better
- IOO $140.47
- VT $155.61
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | IOO | VT |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | D27 | A88Higher |
| Mission | A99 | A100Higher |
| Risk | C45 | C51Higher |
| Tradability | B69Higher | B58 |
| Holdings | D30 | B64Higher |
| Durability | B60 | A79Higher |
Rank among MSCI ACWI / World funds
Same Category. IOO and VT are both graded against the same 6 MSCI ACWI / World funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
IOOB
VTA
In short
IOO Global investing boiled down to 100 mega-caps. Running since 2000, IOO tracks the S&P Global 100: blue chips that already sell on every continent, rather than the whole world's market.
VT One ticker, the whole investable stock market: roughly 9,800 stocks across developed and emerging markets, weighted by what the market says they're worth. There is no US-versus-international call left for you to make.
Stated mandate
IOO The Fund seeks to track the investment results of an index composed of 100 large-capitalization global equities.
VT The fund seeks to passively track the FTSE Global All Cap Index, which represents large-, mid-, and small-capitalization stocks of companies in developed and emerging markets worldwide.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
IOO vs VT Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
IOO vs VT Cost
Overpaying IOO vs VT
$6,820
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
IOO 0.40%
$8,090
VT 0.06%
$1,270
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | IOO | VT | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $723 | $110 | $613 |
| 20 | $2,793 | $432 | $2,361 |
| 30 | $8,090 | $1,270 | $6,820 |
- 0.40%IOO
- 0.06%VT, cheaper
- Middle half of MSCI ACWI / World funds
- Median 0.26%
VT cheapest of 6 funds
IOO 5th cheapest of 6 funds
IOO vs VT Dividends
- IOO 0.83%
- VT 1.55%, better
- IOO $1.17
- VT $2.41
- IOO $0.72
- VT $0.41
- IOO Jun 15, 2026
- VT Sep 18, 2026
- IOO Jun 18, 2026
- VT Sep 22, 2026
- IOO Twice a year
- VT Quarterly
Distribution history
IOO vs VT Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
- IOO
- VT
Risk facts
- Volatility
- IOO 12.9%VT 11.6%, better
- Return per unit of risk
- IOO 1.55, betterVT 1.41
- Worst fall
- IOO −23.5%, betterVT −26.3%
- Market sensitivity
- IOO 0.96VT 0.94
IOO and VT in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.40% · 0.09%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.06% · 0.09%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.40% · 0.20%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.06% · 0.32%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.40% · 0.32%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.06% · 0.20%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

