VT ranks 1st and SPGM 2nd of 6 funds in the MSCI ACWI / World Category.
SPGM vs VT
VT −0.03pt a year
0.09%0.06%
VT 22.9×the volume
115K2.63M
Same figure. Both funds show the same value, so neither comes out ahead.
+12.4%+12.4%
SPGM vs VT Performance
+60.9%+57.4%
- SPGM 0.09%
- VT 0.06%, better
- SPGM $1.8B
- VT $81.8B
- SPGM +13.9%, better
- VT +13.3%
- SPGM 1.81%, better
- VT 1.55%
- SPGM 2917
- VT 10220
- SPGM 115K sh
- VT 2.63M sh, better
- SPGM $85.12
- VT $155.61
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | SPGM | VT |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A73 | A88Higher |
| Mission | A100 | A100 |
| Risk | C49 | C51Higher |
| Tradability | C43 | B58Higher |
| Holdings | A73Higher | B64 |
| Durability | C54 | A79Higher |
Rank among MSCI ACWI / World funds
Same Category. SPGM and VT are both graded against the same 6 MSCI ACWI / World funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
SPGMA
VTA
In short
SPGM One ticker for the whole investable world. SPGM tracks MSCI's ACWI IMI index, holding roughly 2,900 stocks across developed and emerging markets, and charges 0.09% a year to do it.
VT One ticker, the whole investable stock market: roughly 9,800 stocks across developed and emerging markets, weighted by what the market says they're worth. There is no US-versus-international call left for you to make.
Stated mandate
SPGM The fund seeks to track, before fees and expenses, the total return performance of the MSCI ACWI IMI Index.
VT The fund seeks to passively track the FTSE Global All Cap Index, which represents large-, mid-, and small-capitalization stocks of companies in developed and emerging markets worldwide.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
SPGM vs VT Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
SPGM vs VT Cost
Overpaying SPGM vs VT
$628
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
SPGM 0.09%
$1,898
VT 0.06%
$1,270
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | SPGM | VT | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $165 | $110 | $55 |
| 20 | $646 | $432 | $214 |
| 30 | $1,898 | $1,270 | $628 |
- 0.09%SPGM
- 0.06%VT, cheaper
- Middle half of MSCI ACWI / World funds
- Median 0.26%
VT cheapest of 6 funds
SPGM 2nd cheapest of 6 funds
SPGM vs VT Dividends
- SPGM 1.81%, better
- VT 1.55%
- SPGM $1.54
- VT $2.41
- SPGM $0.67
- VT $0.41
- SPGM Jun 1, 2026
- VT Sep 18, 2026
- SPGM Jun 5, 2026
- VT Sep 22, 2026
- SPGM Twice a year
- VT Quarterly
Distribution history
SPGM vs VT Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
- SPGM
- VT
Risk facts
- Volatility
- SPGM 11.5%, betterVT 11.6%
- Return per unit of risk
- SPGM 1.46, betterVT 1.41
- Worst fall
- SPGM −25.9%, betterVT −26.3%
- Market sensitivity
- SPGM 0.93VT 0.94
SPGM and VT in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.09% · 0.20%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.06% · 0.32%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.09% · 0.32%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.06% · 0.40%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.09% · 0.40%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.06% · 0.20%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

