IQSZ ranks 2nd and RCGE 7th of 8 funds in the Climate & Sustainability Category.
IQSZ vs RCGE
IQSZ −0.76pt a year
0.19%0.95%
IQSZ 5.2×the volume
1.5K290
IQSZ vs RCGE Performance
+17.2%+15.5%
- IQSZ 0.19%, better
- RCGE 0.95%
- IQSZ $161M
- RCGE $101M
- IQSZ +17.2%, better
- RCGE +15.5%
- IQSZ 1.94%
- RCGE
- IQSZ 472
- RCGE 202
- IQSZ 1.5K sh, better
- RCGE 290 sh
- IQSZ $30.44
- RCGE $31.23
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | IQSZ | RCGE |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A83Higher | F7 |
| Mission | ||
| Risk | A77 | A79Higher |
| Tradability | D31 | D35Higher |
| Holdings | A75 | A80Higher |
| Durability | B63Higher | D35 |
Rank among Climate & Sustainability funds
Same Category. IQSZ and RCGE are both graded against the same 8 Climate & Sustainability funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
IQSZB
RCGED
In short
IQSZ Active net-zero investing priced like an index fund: 0.19% for a global, roughly 500-stock portfolio where a quant process weighs momentum, quality and value alongside a company's emissions plans.
RCGE Gender-lens investing, taken global and active: RockCreek scores developed and emerging market companies on Equileap's gender-equality data, adds ethical screens, and holds the names that clear the bar.
Stated mandate
IQSZ Seeks long-term total return. It actively invests at least 80% of assets in equity securities of companies judged to support the transition to a net-zero economy through current or planned greenhouse-gas reductions, primarily among large- and mid-cap companies in developed and emerging markets.
RCGE The Fund seeks long-term capital appreciation through an actively managed portfolio of companies selected for demonstrated gender-balance practices and strong gender-equality scores, subject to additional ethical, gender-related, and financial screens.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
IQSZ vs RCGE Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
IQSZ vs RCGE Cost
Overpaying RCGE vs IQSZ
$13,917
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
IQSZ 0.19%
$3,952
RCGE 0.95%
$17,869
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | IQSZ | RCGE | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $347 | $1,678 | $1,331 |
| 20 | $1,351 | $6,322 | $4,971 |
| 30 | $3,952 | $17,869 | $13,917 |
- 0.19%IQSZ, cheaper
- 0.95%RCGE
- Middle half of Climate & Sustainability funds
- Median 0.48%
IQSZ 2nd cheapest of 8 funds
RCGE 8th cheapest of 8 funds
IQSZ vs RCGE Dividends
- IQSZ 1.94%
- RCGE
- IQSZ $0.60
- RCGE
- IQSZ $0.13
- RCGE $0.51
- IQSZ Sep 21, 2026
- RCGE Dec 23, 2025
- IQSZ Sep 25, 2026
- RCGE Dec 26, 2025
- IQSZ Quarterly
- RCGE Irregular
Distribution history
IQSZ vs RCGE Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- IQSZ 11.5%RCGE 11.3%
- Return per unit of risk
- IQSZ 1.41RCGE 0.94
- Worst fall
- IQSZ −9.1%RCGE −12.4%
- Market sensitivity
- IQSZ 0.93RCGE 0.38
Popular comparisons
- 0.19% · 0.10%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.95% · 0.10%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.19% · 0.35%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.95% · 0.35%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.19% · 0.50%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.95% · 0.50%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.