KLMT ranks 1st and IQSZ 2nd of 8 funds in the Climate & Sustainability Category.
IQSZ vs KLMT
KLMT −0.09pt a year
0.19%0.10%
KLMT 1.1×the volume
1.5K1.72K
IQSZ vs KLMT Performance
+16.2%+12.4%
- IQSZ 0.19%
- KLMT 0.10%, better
- IQSZ $169M
- KLMT $1.55B
- IQSZ +16.2%, better
- KLMT +12.4%
- IQSZ 1.93%, better
- KLMT 1.82%
- IQSZ 472
- KLMT 503
- IQSZ 1.5K sh
- KLMT 1.72K sh, better
- IQSZ $31.37
- KLMT $34.14
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | IQSZ | KLMT |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A83 | A93Higher |
| Mission | ||
| Risk | A75 | A75 |
| Tradability | D31 | D35Higher |
| Holdings | A75Higher | A72 |
| Durability | B65 | A70Higher |
Rank among Climate & Sustainability funds
Same Category. IQSZ and KLMT are both graded against the same 8 Climate & Sustainability funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
IQSZB
KLMTA
In short
IQSZ Active net-zero investing priced like an index fund: 0.19% for a global, roughly 500-stock portfolio where a quant process weighs momentum, quality and value alongside a company's emissions plans.
KLMT A climate fund that behaves like a core global index fund: roughly 500 developed and emerging market stocks, full replication, and a 0.10% fee that undercuts most of the thematic aisle.
Stated mandate
IQSZ Seeks long-term total return. It actively invests at least 80% of assets in equity securities of companies judged to support the transition to a net-zero economy through current or planned greenhouse-gas reductions, primarily among large- and mid-cap companies in developed and emerging markets.
KLMT The Fund seeks to track the investment results of the MSCI ACWI Select Climate 500 Index before fees and expenses, using full replication of the index.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
IQSZ vs KLMT Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
IQSZ vs KLMT Cost
Overpaying IQSZ vs KLMT
$1,846
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
IQSZ 0.19%
$3,952
KLMT 0.10%
$2,106
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | IQSZ | KLMT | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $347 | $183 | $164 |
| 20 | $1,351 | $717 | $634 |
| 30 | $3,952 | $2,106 | $1,846 |
- 0.19%IQSZ
- 0.10%KLMT, cheaper
- Middle half of Climate & Sustainability funds
- Median 0.48%
KLMT cheapest of 8 funds
IQSZ 2nd cheapest of 8 funds
IQSZ vs KLMT Dividends
- IQSZ 1.93%, better
- KLMT 1.82%
- IQSZ $0.60
- KLMT $0.62
- IQSZ $0.13
- KLMT $0.14
- IQSZ Sep 21, 2026
- KLMT Sep 21, 2026
- IQSZ Sep 25, 2026
- KLMT Sep 25, 2026
- IQSZ Quarterly
- KLMT Quarterly
Distribution history
IQSZ vs KLMT Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- IQSZ 11.5%KLMT 10.8%
- Return per unit of risk
- IQSZ 1.41KLMT 1.08
- Worst fall
- IQSZ −9.1%KLMT −16.9%
- Market sensitivity
- IQSZ 0.90KLMT 0.89
Popular comparisons
- 0.19% · 0.35%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.10% · 0.35%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.19% · 0.50%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.10% · 0.50%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.19% · 0.65%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.10% · 0.65%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.