PANG ranks 3rd and IRE 258th of 315 funds in the Single-Stock Long Leveraged Category.
IRE vs PANG
0.0%by weight
PANG −0.59pt a year
1.35%0.76%
IRE 223.1×the volume
9.95M44.6K
IRE vs PANG Performance
−96.6%+91.6%
- IRE 1.35%
- PANG 0.76%, better
- IRE $87M
- PANG $9M
- IRE −96.6%
- PANG +91.6%, better
- IRE 10
- PANG 4
- IRE 9.95M sh, better
- PANG 44.6K sh
- IRE $2.76
- PANG $31.31
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | IRE | PANG |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | F21 | A70Higher |
| Mission | A89 | A94Higher |
| Risk | F17 | A74Higher |
| Tradability | A75Higher | A74 |
| Holdings | ||
| Durability | A74Higher | B59 |
Rank among Single-Stock Long Leveraged funds
Same Category. IRE and PANG are both graded against the same 315 Single-Stock Long Leveraged funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
IRED
PANGA
In short
IRE The first ETF built to double IREN's daily move, launched in 2025: two times the daily percentage change in a Bitcoin miner turned AI data center builder, reset every session, at a 1.35% expense ratio.
PANG Palo Alto Networks, doubled. PANG aims for 200% of PANW's daily move, reset every day, and it reached the market days before the only other 2x PANW fund. Flat 0.76% fee, no waiver attached.
Stated mandate
IRE The Fund seeks daily investment results equal to two times the daily percentage change in IREN Limited's share price.
PANG The ETF seeks daily investment results, before fees and expenses, equal to 200% of the daily performance of Palo Alto Networks, Inc. stock.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
IRE vs PANG Holdings
How IRE and PANG differ
0.0%
Shared holdings make up 0.0% of IRE and 0.0% of PANG.
Level by level
- Asset class0.0%
- Holdings0.0%
Sector
No Sector split for IRE and PANG.
Country, concentration and asset class
Country
| Country | More in IREMore in PANG | IRE | PANG |
|---|---|---|---|
| United States | Same weight | 100.0% | 100.0% |
Concentration
- IRE279.5%
- PANG208.4%
- IRE2
- PANG1
Asset class
- IRE
- Leveraged/Inverse
- PANG
- Equity
Holdings
- Only in IRE2
- In both0
- Only in PANG1
Only in IRE
2 securities, 79.1% of IRE by weight
- United States Treasury Bill 11/19/202677.52%
- First American Government Obligations Fund 12/01/20311.59%
Only in PANG
1 security, 8.4% of PANG by weight
- First American Treasury Obligations Fund 01/01/20408.43%
Weight gaps
IRE and PANG share no securities.
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
IRE vs PANG Cost
Overpaying IRE vs PANG
$9,457
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
IRE 1.35%
$24,113
PANG 0.76%
$14,656
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | IRE | PANG | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $2,346 | $1,353 | $993 |
| 20 | $8,678 | $5,142 | $3,536 |
| 30 | $24,113 | $14,656 | $9,457 |
- 1.35%IRE
- 0.76%PANG, cheaper
- Middle half of Single-Stock Long Leveraged funds
- Median 0.97%
PANG 131st cheapest of 315 funds
IRE 252nd cheapest of 315 funds
IRE vs PANG Dividends
- IRE None
- PANG
- IRE
- PANG $1.30
- IRE
- PANG Dec 30, 2025
- IRE
- PANG Jan 2, 2026
- IRE
- PANG Irregular
Distribution history
IRE vs PANG Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- IRE 186.4%PANG 128.2%
- Return per unit of risk
- IRE −0.74PANG 0.90
- Worst fall
- IRE −97.8%PANG −62.4%
- Market sensitivity
- IRE 9.22PANG 3.32
Popular comparisons
- 1.35% · 0.76%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.76% · 0.76%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 1.35% · 0.77%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.76% · 0.77%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 1.35% · 0.75%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.76% · 0.75%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.