Skip to content

ISSB vs LQDW

IncomeSTKd 1x US Stocks & 1x Bitcoin Premium ETF

ISSBFCboe

iShares Investment Grade Corporate Bond BuyWrite Strategy ETF

LQDWACboe

Overlap

Expense ratio

LQDW −0.80pt a year

ISSB1.14%LQDW0.34%

Avg volume · 30D

LQDW 80.1×the volume

ISSB1.34KLQDW107K

ISSB vs LQDW Performance

Jul 31, 2026 – Oct 30, 2026

+22.5%ISSB+0.8%LQDW

Jul 31, 2026 to Oct 30, 2026. ISSB +22.5%. LQDW +0.8%. Use the arrow keys to read each point.10%30%40%50%Jul 2026Sep 2026Oct 2026
Expense ratio
ISSB 1.14%
LQDW 0.34%, better
Fund size
ISSB $2M
LQDW $353M
1Y total return
ISSB No data
LQDW +2.0%
Yield (12M)
ISSB No data
LQDW 12.38%
Holdings
ISSB 5
LQDW 3192
Avg volume (30D)
ISSB 1.34K sh
LQDW 107K sh, better
NAV per share
ISSB $21.94
LQDW $22.87
52W range

ETF.net Grade

ISSB: Cost 6, Risk 19, Mission not scored, Tradability 3, Holdings not scored, Durability 13. LQDW: Cost 100, Risk 66, Mission 94, Tradability 78, Holdings 100, Durability 82.
Pillar letters and Scores for ISSB, LQDW, with each pillar’s weight
PillarISSBLQDW
Cost30% weightF6A100Higher
Mission25% weightNot scoredA94
Risk15% weightF19B66Higher
Tradability15% weightF3A78Higher
Holdings10% weightNot scoredA100
Durability5% weightF13A82Higher

Rank among Index Option Income funds

Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Same Category. ISSB and LQDW are both graded against the same 25 Index Option Income funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Index Option Income⁠

Category · 25 funds
See all 25 ›

LQDW ranks 1st and ISSB 25th of 25 funds in the Index Option Income Category.

  1. Rank 1ALQDWiShares Investment Grade Corporate Bond BuyWrite Strategy ETFScore 87
  2. Rank 2AEFAAInvesco MSCI EAFE Income Advantage ETFScore 78
  3. Rank 24FDRMYXFUNDS MEMORY INCOME ETFScore 17
  4. Rank 25FISSBIncomeSTKd 1x US Stocks & 1x Bitcoin Premium ETFScore 8

Our read on each fund

ETF.net Research

ISSBFIncomeSTKd 1x US Stocks & 1x Bitcoin Premium ETF

LQDWAiShares Investment Grade Corporate Bond BuyWrite Strategy ETF

In short

ISSB No data

LQDW Covered calls, but on bonds. LQDW owns iShares' flagship investment-grade corporate bond fund and writes monthly calls against it, paying distributions monthly, at less than half the option-income cohort's median fee.

Stated mandate

ISSB No data

LQDW The fund seeks to track a strategy holding LQD while writing monthly covered calls to generate income.

Why people hold it

ISSB No data

  • LQDW At 0.34%, it undercuts the typical option-income fund by well over half (cohort median 0.75%), so less of the premium collected leaks out as fees.
  • One ticker buys the whole trade: shares of LQD plus a rules-based monthly call overlay. No options approval, no roll dates to babysit.ishares.com
  • A thin niche. Most option-income funds write calls on stock baskets; this one sits on investment-grade corporate credit instead.
  • Distributions land monthly, and since its 2022 launch the fund has stuck closely to its stated strategy, among the tighter implementations in its peer group.

Worth knowing

ISSB No data

  • LQDW Written calls cap the upside. If corporate bonds rally hard, the premium collected is the consolation for price gains handed to the call buyer.
  • Premium cushions, it does not shield. Widening credit spreads or rising rates still hit the underlying bond portfolio.
  • Mid-sized and moderately traded rather than a giant, so spreads can run wider than in the biggest option-income names, especially in fast markets.

Full ISSB profile⁠

Full LQDW profile⁠

ISSB vs LQDW Holdings

How we measure overlap

Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.

ISSB vs LQDW Cost

Overpaying ISSB vs LQDW

$13,988

On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.

  • ISSB 1.14%

    $20,920

  • LQDW 0.34%

    $6,932

$10,000
30 years

Cost over time

  • ISSB 1.14%
  • LQDW 0.34%
  • Overpaying
One line per fund, from year 0 to year 30. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$5K$10K$15K$20K$25K051015202530ISSB $20,920LQDW $6,932

Year by year

YearISSBLQDWOverpaying
10$1,998$616$1,382
20$7,462$2,386$5,076
30$20,920$6,932$13,988

Expense ratio

  • 1.14%ISSB
  • 0.34%LQDW, cheaper
  • Middle half of Index Option Income funds
  • Median 0.81%

LQDW cheapest of 25 funds

ISSB 23rd cheapest of 25 funds

ISSB vs LQDW Dividends

Last 12 months to Oct 30, 2026
Yield (12M)
ISSB No data
LQDW 12.38%
Payout (12M)
ISSB No data
LQDW $2.83
Last payment
ISSB $0.07
LQDW $0.38
Ex-dividend
ISSB Oct 26, 2026
LQDW Oct 2, 2026
Paid on
ISSB Oct 27, 2026
LQDW Oct 7, 2026
Frequency
ISSB Weekly
LQDW Monthly

Distribution history

Per share, 2026, same scale for both

ISSBWeekly · 39 paymentsAll ISSB payments⁠
One bar per payment. 39 payments in 2026 YTD. Feb 2, 2026 $0.09; Feb 9, 2026 $0.09; Feb 13, 2026 $0.09; Feb 23, 2026 $0.08; Mar 2, 2026 $0.08; Mar 9, 2026 $0.08; Mar 16, 2026 $0.08; Mar 23, 2026 $0.08; Mar 30, 2026 $0.07; Apr 6, 2026 $0.07; Apr 13, 2026 $0.08; Apr 20, 2026 $0.08; Apr 27, 2026 $0.08; May 4, 2026 $0.08; May 11, 2026 $0.09; May 18, 2026 $0.09; May 22, 2026 $0.08; Jun 1, 2026 $0.08; Jun 8, 2026 $0.07; Jun 15, 2026 $0.06; Jun 22, 2026 $0.07; Jun 29, 2026 $0.05; Jul 6, 2026 $0.06; Jul 13, 2026 $0.06; Jul 20, 2026 $0.06; Jul 27, 2026 $0.06; Aug 3, 2026 $0.06; Aug 10, 2026 $0.06; Aug 17, 2026 $0.06; Aug 24, 2026 $0.07; Aug 31, 2026 $0.08; Sep 4, 2026 $0.08; Sep 14, 2026 $0.07; Sep 21, 2026 $0.07; Sep 28, 2026 $0.08; Oct 5, 2026 $0.08; Oct 9, 2026 $0.08; Oct 19, 2026 $0.08; Oct 26, 2026 $0.07. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$0.252026YTD
LQDWMonthly · 9 paymentsAll LQDW payments⁠
One bar per payment. 9 payments in 2026 YTD. Feb 3, 2026 $0.22; Mar 3, 2026 $0.16; Apr 2, 2026 $0.30; May 4, 2026 $0.17; Jun 2, 2026 $0.18; Jul 2, 2026 $0.19; Aug 4, 2026 $0.20; Sep 2, 2026 $0.15; Oct 2, 2026 $0.38. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$0.252026YTD

ISSB vs LQDW Risk

Fall from peak · 5 years

This chart needs five years of history for both funds.

Risk facts

VolatilityStd dev, 3 years
ISSB No dataLQDW 4.2%
Return per unit of riskSharpe ratio, 3 years
ISSB No dataLQDW 0.16
Worst fallMax drawdown, 5 years
ISSB No dataLQDW −9.2%since Aug 2022
Market sensitivityBeta, 5 years
ISSB 1.71LQDW 0.59

ISSB and LQDW in the news

Popular comparisons

  • ISSBFvsEFAAA

    IncomeSTKd 1x US Stocks & 1x Bitcoin Premium ETF · Invesco MSCI EAFE Income Advantage ETF

    Expense ratio
    1.14% · 0.39%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • LQDWAvsEFAAA

    iShares Investment Grade Corporate Bond BuyWrite Strategy ETF · Invesco MSCI EAFE Income Advantage ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.34% · 0.39%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • ISSBFvsKNGA

    IncomeSTKd 1x US Stocks & 1x Bitcoin Premium ETF · FT Cboe Vest S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats Target Income ETF

    Expense ratio
    1.14% · 0.74%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • LQDWAvsKNGA

    iShares Investment Grade Corporate Bond BuyWrite Strategy ETF · FT Cboe Vest S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats Target Income ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.34% · 0.74%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • ISSBFvsIDUBB

    IncomeSTKd 1x US Stocks & 1x Bitcoin Premium ETF · Aptus International Enhanced Yield ETF

    Expense ratio
    1.14% · 0.44%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • LQDWAvsIDUBB

    iShares Investment Grade Corporate Bond BuyWrite Strategy ETF · Aptus International Enhanced Yield ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.34% · 0.44%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.