IUSB ranks 2nd and JBND 30th of 114 funds in the US Aggregate Bond Category.
IUSB vs JBND
IUSB −0.19pt a year
0.06%0.25%
IUSB 5.1×the volume
6.13M1.19M
JBND +0.6pt
+5.8%+6.4%
IUSB vs JBND Performance
0.0%+0.1%
- IUSB 0.06%, better
- JBND 0.25%
- IUSB $50.2B
- JBND $9.53B
- IUSB 0.0%
- JBND +0.1%, better
- IUSB 4.32%
- JBND 4.57%, better
- IUSB 18280
- JBND 1767
- IUSB 6.13M sh, better
- JBND 1.19M sh
- IUSB $44.91
- JBND $51.92
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | IUSB | JBND |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A92Higher | B64 |
| Mission | A100 | A100 |
| Risk | C54Higher | C50 |
| Tradability | A89Higher | B58 |
| Holdings | A76Higher | A70 |
| Durability | A94Higher | A77 |
Rank among US Aggregate Bond funds
Same Category. IUSB and JBND are both graded against the same 114 US Aggregate Bond funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
IUSBA
JBNDA
In short
IUSB Most core bond funds stop at investment grade. IUSB keeps going, folding high-yield USD debt into the same wrapper across roughly 18,000 bonds, for 0.06% a year.
JBND Active core bond management at near-index pricing: J.P. Morgan's bond desk runs roughly 1,700 holdings against the Agg with extra weight in securitized debt, for 0.25% a year.
Stated mandate
IUSB The Fund seeks to track an index of U.S.-dollar-denominated bonds spanning investment-grade and high-yield sectors.
JBND Seeks total return through active management of U.S. investment-grade bonds, primarily a diversified intermediate-term, high-quality portfolio with greater emphasis on securitized bonds.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
IUSB vs JBND Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
IUSB vs JBND Cost
Overpaying JBND vs IUSB
$3,889
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
IUSB 0.06%
$1,270
JBND 0.25%
$5,159
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | IUSB | JBND | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $110 | $455 | $345 |
| 20 | $432 | $1,769 | $1,337 |
| 30 | $1,270 | $5,159 | $3,889 |
- 0.06%IUSB, cheaper
- 0.25%JBND
- Middle half of US Aggregate Bond funds
- Median 0.34%
IUSB 10th cheapest of 114 funds
JBND 39th cheapest of 114 funds
IUSB vs JBND Dividends
- IUSB 4.32%
- JBND 4.57%, better
- IUSB $1.94
- JBND $2.38
- IUSB $0.15
- JBND $0.20
- IUSB Oct 1, 2026
- JBND Oct 1, 2026
- IUSB Oct 6, 2026
- JBND Oct 5, 2026
- IUSB Monthly
- JBND Monthly
Distribution history
IUSB vs JBND Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- IUSB 5.5%JBND 5.5%Same figure. Both funds show the same value, so neither comes out ahead.
- Return per unit of risk
- IUSB 0.25JBND 0.34, better
- Worst fall
- IUSB −17.4%JBND −4.7%
- Market sensitivity
- IUSB 0.96JBND 0.20
IUSB and JBND in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.06% · 0.03%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.25% · 0.03%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.06% · 0.03%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.25% · 0.03%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.06% · 0.03%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.25% · 0.03%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
