IUSB ranks 2nd and NUBD 22nd of 114 funds in the US Aggregate Bond Category.
IUSB vs NUBD
IUSB −0.06pt a year
0.06%0.12%
IUSB 62.4×the volume
6.13M98.1K
IUSB +0.5pt
+0.2%−0.3%
IUSB vs NUBD Performance
+0.9%−1.3%
- IUSB 0.06%, better
- NUBD 0.12%
- IUSB $50.2B
- NUBD $495M
- IUSB 0.0%, better
- NUBD −0.4%
- IUSB 4.32%, better
- NUBD 4.12%
- IUSB 18280
- NUBD 2491
- IUSB 6.13M sh, better
- NUBD 98.1K sh
- IUSB $44.91
- NUBD $21.56
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | IUSB | NUBD |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A92Higher | A82 |
| Mission | A100 | A100 |
| Risk | C54Higher | C47 |
| Tradability | A89Higher | C47 |
| Holdings | A76Higher | A72 |
| Durability | A94Higher | B65 |
Rank among US Aggregate Bond funds
Same Category. IUSB and NUBD are both graded against the same 114 US Aggregate Bond funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
IUSBA
NUBDA
In short
IUSB Most core bond funds stop at investment grade. IUSB keeps going, folding high-yield USD debt into the same wrapper across roughly 18,000 bonds, for 0.06% a year.
NUBD The core bond index, run through an ESG filter. NUBD tracks a Bloomberg MSCI U.S. Aggregate ESG Select benchmark across roughly 2,400 investment-grade bonds, at a fraction of what the typical bond fund in its group charges.
Stated mandate
IUSB The Fund seeks to track an index of U.S.-dollar-denominated bonds spanning investment-grade and high-yield sectors.
NUBD The Fund passively invests in diversified U.S. investment-grade bonds that meet environmental, social and governance criteria and seeks to track the Bloomberg Barclays MSCI U.S. Aggregate ESG Select Index before fees and expenses.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
IUSB vs NUBD Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
IUSB vs NUBD Cost
Overpaying NUBD vs IUSB
$1,250
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
IUSB 0.06%
$1,270
NUBD 0.12%
$2,520
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | IUSB | NUBD | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $110 | $220 | $110 |
| 20 | $432 | $859 | $427 |
| 30 | $1,270 | $2,520 | $1,250 |
- 0.06%IUSB, cheaper
- 0.12%NUBD
- Middle half of US Aggregate Bond funds
- Median 0.34%
IUSB 10th cheapest of 114 funds
NUBD 21st cheapest of 114 funds
IUSB vs NUBD Dividends
- IUSB 4.32%, better
- NUBD 4.12%
- IUSB $1.94
- NUBD $0.89
- IUSB $0.15
- NUBD $0.08
- IUSB Oct 1, 2026
- NUBD Oct 1, 2026
- IUSB Oct 6, 2026
- NUBD Oct 2, 2026
- IUSB Monthly
- NUBD Monthly
Distribution history
IUSB vs NUBD Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
- IUSB
- NUBD
Risk facts
- Volatility
- IUSB 5.5%NUBD 5.5%Same figure. Both funds show the same value, so neither comes out ahead.
- Return per unit of risk
- IUSB 0.25, betterNUBD 0.14
- Worst fall
- IUSB −17.4%NUBD −17.2%, better
- Market sensitivity
- IUSB 0.96NUBD 1.00
IUSB and NUBD in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.06% · 0.03%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.12% · 0.03%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.06% · 0.03%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.12% · 0.03%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.06% · 0.03%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.12% · 0.03%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
