AGG ranks 1st and NUBD 22nd of 114 funds in the US Aggregate Bond Category.
AGG vs NUBD
AGG −0.09pt a year
0.03%0.12%
AGG 101.4×the volume
9.95M98.1K
AGG +0.1pt
−0.2%−0.3%
AGG vs NUBD Performance
−0.9%−1.3%
- AGG 0.03%, better
- NUBD 0.12%
- AGG $140B
- NUBD $495M
- AGG −0.2%, better
- NUBD −0.4%
- AGG 4.12%
- NUBD 4.12%
- AGG 13428
- NUBD 2491
- AGG 9.95M sh, better
- NUBD 98.1K sh
- AGG $96.45
- NUBD $21.56
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | AGG | NUBD |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A97Higher | A82 |
| Mission | A100 | A100 |
| Risk | C47 | C47 |
| Tradability | A94Higher | C47 |
| Holdings | A77Higher | A72 |
| Durability | A95Higher | B65 |
Rank among US Aggregate Bond funds
Same Category. AGG and NUBD are both graded against the same 114 US Aggregate Bond funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
AGGA
NUBDA
In short
AGG Launched in 2003, one of the first funds to pack the entire U.S. investment-grade bond market into a single ticker: Treasuries, corporates and mortgage bonds, three basis points a year, cash paid monthly.
NUBD The core bond index, run through an ESG filter. NUBD tracks a Bloomberg MSCI U.S. Aggregate ESG Select benchmark across roughly 2,400 investment-grade bonds, at a fraction of what the typical bond fund in its group charges.
Stated mandate
AGG The fund seeks to track the Bloomberg U.S. Aggregate Bond Index, providing broad exposure to the total U.S. investment-grade bond market.
NUBD The Fund passively invests in diversified U.S. investment-grade bonds that meet environmental, social and governance criteria and seeks to track the Bloomberg Barclays MSCI U.S. Aggregate ESG Select Index before fees and expenses.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
AGG vs NUBD Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
AGG vs NUBD Cost
Overpaying NUBD vs AGG
$1,882
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
AGG 0.03%
$638
NUBD 0.12%
$2,520
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | AGG | NUBD | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $55 | $220 | $165 |
| 20 | $216 | $859 | $643 |
| 30 | $638 | $2,520 | $1,882 |
- 0.03%AGG, cheaper
- 0.12%NUBD
- Middle half of US Aggregate Bond funds
- Median 0.34%
AGG 2nd cheapest of 114 funds
NUBD 21st cheapest of 114 funds
AGG vs NUBD Dividends
- AGG 4.12%
- NUBD 4.12%
- AGG $3.97
- NUBD $0.89
- AGG $0.33
- NUBD $0.08
- AGG Oct 1, 2026
- NUBD Oct 1, 2026
- AGG Oct 6, 2026
- NUBD Oct 2, 2026
- AGG Monthly
- NUBD Monthly
Distribution history
AGG vs NUBD Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
- AGG
- NUBD
Risk facts
- Volatility
- AGG 5.6%NUBD 5.5%, better
- Return per unit of risk
- AGG 0.17, betterNUBD 0.14
- Worst fall
- AGG −17.3%NUBD −17.2%, better
- Market sensitivity
- AGG 0.99NUBD 1.00
AGG and NUBD in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.03% · 0.06%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.12% · 0.06%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.03% · 0.03%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.12% · 0.03%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.03% · 0.03%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.12% · 0.03%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.





