IUSB ranks 2nd and OACP 81st of 114 funds in the US Aggregate Bond Category.
IUSB vs OACP
IUSB −0.68pt a year
0.06%0.74%
IUSB 85.8×the volume
6.13M71.4K
IUSB +0.2pt
+5.8%+5.6%
IUSB vs OACP Performance
0.0%−0.6%
- IUSB 0.06%, better
- OACP 0.74%
- IUSB $50.2B
- OACP $269M
- IUSB 0.0%, better
- OACP −0.6%
- IUSB 4.32%
- OACP 4.46%, better
- IUSB 18280
- OACP 288
- IUSB 6.13M sh, better
- OACP 71.4K sh
- IUSB $44.91
- OACP $22.02
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | IUSB | OACP |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A92Higher | F6 |
| Mission | A100 | A100 |
| Risk | C54Higher | C47 |
| Tradability | A89Higher | B55 |
| Holdings | A76Higher | B64 |
| Durability | A94Higher | C48 |
Rank among US Aggregate Bond funds
Same Category. IUSB and OACP are both graded against the same 114 US Aggregate Bond funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
IUSBA
OACPC
In short
IUSB Most core bond funds stop at investment grade. IUSB keeps going, folding high-yield USD debt into the same wrapper across roughly 18,000 bonds, for 0.06% a year.
OACP OneAscent's values screens set the eligible universe; an outside institutional bond team builds the portfolio from what clears. Actively managed, pays monthly, and free to roam past the Agg into high yield, non-US dollar and emerging market debt.
Stated mandate
IUSB The Fund seeks to track an index of U.S.-dollar-denominated bonds spanning investment-grade and high-yield sectors.
OACP The Fund seeks total return, emphasizing income while applying values-based and impact criteria. Its strategy invests primarily in a broad range of fixed-income securities and may use relative-value trading and fixed-income derivatives.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
IUSB vs OACP Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
IUSB vs OACP Cost
Overpaying OACP vs IUSB
$13,037
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
IUSB 0.06%
$1,270
OACP 0.74%
$14,307
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | IUSB | OACP | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $110 | $1,319 | $1,209 |
| 20 | $432 | $5,015 | $4,583 |
| 30 | $1,270 | $14,307 | $13,037 |
- 0.06%IUSB, cheaper
- 0.74%OACP
- Middle half of US Aggregate Bond funds
- Median 0.34%
IUSB 10th cheapest of 114 funds
OACP 107th cheapest of 114 funds
IUSB vs OACP Dividends
- IUSB 4.32%
- OACP 4.46%, better
- IUSB $1.94
- OACP $0.98
- IUSB $0.15
- OACP $0.09
- IUSB Oct 1, 2026
- OACP Oct 29, 2026
- IUSB Oct 6, 2026
- OACP Pays Nov 3, 2026
- IUSB Monthly
- OACP Monthly
Distribution history
IUSB vs OACP Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- IUSB 5.5%OACP 5.5%Same figure. Both funds show the same value, so neither comes out ahead.
- Return per unit of risk
- IUSB 0.25, betterOACP 0.22
- Worst fall
- IUSB −17.4%OACP −11.8%
- Market sensitivity
- IUSB 0.96OACP 0.93
IUSB and OACP in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.06% · 0.03%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.74% · 0.03%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.06% · 0.03%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.74% · 0.03%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.06% · 0.03%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.74% · 0.03%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
