SPAB ranks 2nd and OACP 81st of 114 funds in the US Aggregate Bond Category.
OACP vs SPAB
SPAB −0.71pt a year
0.74%0.03%
SPAB 43.6×the volume
71.4K3.11M
OACP +0.2pt
+5.6%+5.4%
OACP vs SPAB Performance
−0.6%−0.2%
- OACP 0.74%
- SPAB 0.03%, better
- OACP $269M
- SPAB $10.4B
- OACP −0.6%
- SPAB −0.2%, better
- OACP 4.46%, better
- SPAB 4.20%
- OACP 288
- SPAB 8697
- OACP 71.4K sh
- SPAB 3.11M sh, better
- OACP $22.02
- SPAB $24.78
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | OACP | SPAB |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | F6 | A97Higher |
| Mission | A100 | A100 |
| Risk | C47 | C47 |
| Tradability | B55 | A90Higher |
| Holdings | B64 | A76Higher |
| Durability | C48 | A91Higher |
Rank among US Aggregate Bond funds
Same Category. OACP and SPAB are both graded against the same 114 US Aggregate Bond funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
OACPC
SPABA
In short
OACP OneAscent's values screens set the eligible universe; an outside institutional bond team builds the portfolio from what clears. Actively managed, pays monthly, and free to roam past the Agg into high yield, non-US dollar and emerging market debt.
SPAB A 2007-vintage core bond fund priced at 0.03%: roughly 8,500 US investment-grade bonds in one ticket, at the same rock-bottom fee the household names charge for the same index.
Stated mandate
OACP The Fund seeks total return, emphasizing income while applying values-based and impact criteria. Its strategy invests primarily in a broad range of fixed-income securities and may use relative-value trading and fixed-income derivatives.
SPAB The fund seeks to track the price and yield performance of the Bloomberg U.S. Aggregate Bond Index before fees and expenses, providing broad exposure to U.S.-dollar-denominated investment-grade bonds.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
OACP vs SPAB Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
OACP vs SPAB Cost
Overpaying OACP vs SPAB
$13,669
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
OACP 0.74%
$14,307
SPAB 0.03%
$638
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | OACP | SPAB | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $1,319 | $55 | $1,264 |
| 20 | $5,015 | $216 | $4,799 |
| 30 | $14,307 | $638 | $13,669 |
- 0.74%OACP
- 0.03%SPAB, cheaper
- Middle half of US Aggregate Bond funds
- Median 0.34%
SPAB 2nd cheapest of 114 funds
OACP 107th cheapest of 114 funds
OACP vs SPAB Dividends
- OACP 4.46%, better
- SPAB 4.20%
- OACP $0.98
- SPAB $1.04
- OACP $0.09
- SPAB $0.09
- OACP Oct 29, 2026
- SPAB Oct 1, 2026
- OACP Pays Nov 3, 2026
- SPAB Oct 6, 2026
- OACP Monthly
- SPAB Monthly
Distribution history
OACP vs SPAB Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- OACP 5.5%, betterSPAB 5.6%
- Return per unit of risk
- OACP 0.22, betterSPAB 0.17
- Worst fall
- OACP −11.8%SPAB −17.4%
- Market sensitivity
- OACP 0.93SPAB 1.00
OACP and SPAB in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.74% · 0.03%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.03% · 0.03%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.74% · 0.06%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.03% · 0.06%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.74% · 0.03%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.03% · 0.03%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

