IUSB ranks 2nd and UCON 71st of 114 funds in the US Aggregate Bond Category.
IUSB vs UCON
IUSB −0.80pt a year
0.06%0.86%
IUSB 9.8×the volume
6.13M627K
UCON +2.2pt
+0.2%+2.4%
IUSB vs UCON Performance
+0.9%+12.8%
- IUSB 0.06%, better
- UCON 0.86%
- IUSB $50.2B
- UCON $3.12B
- IUSB 0.0%, better
- UCON −0.1%
- IUSB 4.32%
- UCON 4.78%, better
- IUSB 18280
- UCON 451
- IUSB 6.13M sh, better
- UCON 627K sh
- IUSB $44.91
- UCON $24.09
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | IUSB | UCON |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A92Higher | F4 |
| Mission | A100Higher | A96 |
| Risk | C54 | B64Higher |
| Tradability | A89Higher | C52 |
| Holdings | A76 | A83Higher |
| Durability | A94Higher | A80 |
Rank among US Aggregate Bond funds
Same Category. IUSB and UCON are both graded against the same 114 US Aggregate Bond funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
IUSBA
UCONC
In short
IUSB Most core bond funds stop at investment grade. IUSB keeps going, folding high-yield USD debt into the same wrapper across roughly 18,000 bonds, for 0.06% a year.
UCON A bond fund with no index to hug. UCON's mandate keeps at least 80% in fixed income and leaves the rest of the map open, spreading roughly a thousand positions across the bond market and paying out monthly.
Stated mandate
IUSB The Fund seeks to track an index of U.S.-dollar-denominated bonds spanning investment-grade and high-yield sectors.
UCON The fund seeks to maximize long-term total return and normally invests at least 80% of its net assets in fixed-income securities.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
IUSB vs UCON Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
IUSB vs UCON Cost
Overpaying UCON vs IUSB
$15,098
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
IUSB 0.06%
$1,270
UCON 0.86%
$16,368
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | IUSB | UCON | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $110 | $1,525 | $1,415 |
| 20 | $432 | $5,768 | $5,336 |
| 30 | $1,270 | $16,368 | $15,098 |
- 0.06%IUSB, cheaper
- 0.86%UCON
- Middle half of US Aggregate Bond funds
- Median 0.34%
IUSB 10th cheapest of 114 funds
UCON 110th cheapest of 114 funds
IUSB vs UCON Dividends
- IUSB 4.32%
- UCON 4.78%, better
- IUSB $1.94
- UCON $1.15
- IUSB $0.15
- UCON $0.10
- IUSB Oct 1, 2026
- UCON Oct 21, 2026
- IUSB Oct 6, 2026
- UCON Oct 30, 2026
- IUSB Monthly
- UCON Monthly
Distribution history
IUSB vs UCON Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
- IUSB
- UCON
Risk facts
- Volatility
- IUSB 5.5%UCON 3.9%, better
- Return per unit of risk
- IUSB 0.25, betterUCON 0.24
- Worst fall
- IUSB −17.4%UCON −9.5%, better
- Market sensitivity
- IUSB 0.96UCON 0.59
IUSB and UCON in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.06% · 0.03%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.86% · 0.03%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.06% · 0.03%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.86% · 0.03%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.06% · 0.03%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.86% · 0.03%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
