SPAB ranks 2nd and UCON 71st of 114 funds in the US Aggregate Bond Category.
SPAB vs UCON
SPAB −0.83pt a year
0.03%0.86%
SPAB 5.0×the volume
3.11M627K
UCON +2.6pt
−0.2%+2.4%
SPAB vs UCON Performance
−0.9%+12.8%
- SPAB 0.03%, better
- UCON 0.86%
- SPAB $10.4B
- UCON $3.12B
- SPAB −0.2%
- UCON −0.1%, better
- SPAB 4.20%
- UCON 4.78%, better
- SPAB 8697
- UCON 451
- SPAB 3.11M sh, better
- UCON 627K sh
- SPAB $24.78
- UCON $24.09
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | SPAB | UCON |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A97Higher | F4 |
| Mission | A100Higher | A96 |
| Risk | C47 | B64Higher |
| Tradability | A90Higher | C52 |
| Holdings | A76 | A83Higher |
| Durability | A91Higher | A80 |
Rank among US Aggregate Bond funds
Same Category. SPAB and UCON are both graded against the same 114 US Aggregate Bond funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
SPABA
UCONC
In short
SPAB A 2007-vintage core bond fund priced at 0.03%: roughly 8,500 US investment-grade bonds in one ticket, at the same rock-bottom fee the household names charge for the same index.
UCON A bond fund with no index to hug. UCON's mandate keeps at least 80% in fixed income and leaves the rest of the map open, spreading roughly a thousand positions across the bond market and paying out monthly.
Stated mandate
SPAB The fund seeks to track the price and yield performance of the Bloomberg U.S. Aggregate Bond Index before fees and expenses, providing broad exposure to U.S.-dollar-denominated investment-grade bonds.
UCON The fund seeks to maximize long-term total return and normally invests at least 80% of its net assets in fixed-income securities.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
SPAB vs UCON Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
SPAB vs UCON Cost
Overpaying UCON vs SPAB
$15,730
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
SPAB 0.03%
$638
UCON 0.86%
$16,368
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | SPAB | UCON | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $55 | $1,525 | $1,470 |
| 20 | $216 | $5,768 | $5,552 |
| 30 | $638 | $16,368 | $15,730 |
- 0.03%SPAB, cheaper
- 0.86%UCON
- Middle half of US Aggregate Bond funds
- Median 0.34%
SPAB 2nd cheapest of 114 funds
UCON 110th cheapest of 114 funds
SPAB vs UCON Dividends
- SPAB 4.20%
- UCON 4.78%, better
- SPAB $1.04
- UCON $1.15
- SPAB $0.09
- UCON $0.10
- SPAB Oct 1, 2026
- UCON Oct 21, 2026
- SPAB Oct 6, 2026
- UCON Oct 30, 2026
- SPAB Monthly
- UCON Monthly
Distribution history
SPAB vs UCON Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
- SPAB
- UCON
Risk facts
- Volatility
- SPAB 5.6%UCON 3.9%, better
- Return per unit of risk
- SPAB 0.17UCON 0.24, better
- Worst fall
- SPAB −17.4%UCON −9.5%, better
- Market sensitivity
- SPAB 1.00UCON 0.59
SPAB and UCON in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.03% · 0.03%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.86% · 0.03%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.03% · 0.06%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.86% · 0.06%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.03% · 0.03%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.86% · 0.03%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

